Benjamin Franklin Isherwood, Naval Engineer. Edward William Sloan III

Benjamin Franklin Isherwood, Naval Engineer - Edward William Sloan III


Скачать книгу

      

      BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ISHERWOOD NAVAL ENGINEER

      THE YEARS AS ENGINEER IN CHIEF, 1861-1869

      BY

      EDWARD WILLIAM SLOAN, III

      UNITED STATES NAVAL INSTITUTE

       Annapolis, Maryland

      This book has been brought to publication by the generous assistance of Marguerite and Gerry Lenfest.

      First Naval Institute Press paperback edition 2012

      ISBN 978-1-61251-291-4

       Copyright © 1965

       By United States Naval Institute

       Annapolis, Maryland

       Library of Congress Catalogue Card No. 65–22011

       To my son, Michael

       Preface

      The shot-and-shell approach to the writing of naval history has, for years, unnecessarily limited our knowledge and appreciation of the United States Navy’s role during time of war. Shunted aside by the romance of the broadside, naval technology and, in particular, naval administration have at best received brief mention. Consequently, those men who served behind the lines in wartime have earned scant historical notice, regardless of their immediate or ultimate contributions to the service and to their nation. Benjamin Franklin Isherwood is one such man.

      Isherwood’s naval career, spanning those forty years which saw the transition from the first steam warships of the 1840’s to the birth of the modern American Navy in the 1880’s, reached its zenith during his eight-year service, from 1861 to 1869, as engineer in chief of the Navy. During and immediately after the American Civil War, he exercised his greatest influence both in the Navy and in the world of engineering. It is proper, therefore, to begin his rescue from historical obscurity by presenting him at the most active, productive, and controversial time of his life.

      In no sense is this book intended to be the full biography of Benjamin Isherwood. Rather, it is a study of that relatively brief period of his life which has the greatest historical significance.

      This is the story of Isherwood as a naval officer and as an engineer. These two facets of his life were inseparable, and in both areas he engaged in bitter and widespread controversy during his entire tenure as engineer in chief. His considerable contribution to the development of marine steam propulsion and to the advancement of scientific techniques in experimentation equalled in importance his administrative services to the Navy, and as an engineering pioneer of the mid-nineteenth century, his career in the realm of technology was no less arduous than that in the Navy. His efforts to carry on these two careers simultaneously and successfully during a period of national crisis best demonstrate Benjamin Isherwood’s remarkable talents, resourcefulness, and dedication to duty.

      With no major collection of Isherwood papers on which to base this study, I have relied on the abundant, if incomplete, official records of the Navy Department deposited in the United States National Archives. From the collected papers of Gideon Welles, Gustavus Fox, David Dixon Porter, John Ericsson, and others, I have assembled additional material, especially personal reports and observations which supplement the departmental records and shed light—and often considerable heat—on the career of Benjamin Isherwood.

      Fortunately, Isherwood’s granddaughter, Mrs. Madeleine Kerwin, of New York city, has been of invaluable aid in providing abundant and colorful recollections of his private life, especially for the period after his retirement from the Navy. Mrs. Kerwin spent much of her childhood living in Isherwood’s house, and by the time he died she was in her thirties. My interpretation of his personality rests largely on facts and impressions which I obtained from Mrs. Kerwin in a series of interviews held during 1962. Through her detailed and perceptive recollections, I have come to know Benjamin Isherwood as a captivating and remarkable, albeit obdurate, opinionated, and thoroughly fallible human being.

      I wish to thank the following people for their considered advice and generous assistance: Wilmer R. Leech and Arthur J. Breton, Manuscripts Division of The New-York Historical Society; David C. Mearns and his staff, Manuscript Division of The Library of Congress; Elbert L. Huber and his staff, Naval and Military Service Branch of The National Archives; Buford Rowland, The National Archives; P. K. Lundeberg, Howard Chapelle, Melvin Jackson, Robert Vogel, and Silvio Bedini, Smithsonian Institution; Professor Eugene S. Ferguson, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Rear Admiral E. M. Eller, U. S. Navy (Retired), director of Naval History, Naval Historical Foundation, Department of the Navy; Joseph S. Hepburn, The Franklin Institute of the State of Pennsylvania; John Buchanan, Cornell University Library; Professor Vernon D. Tate, United States Naval Academy; Ruth M. Leonard, American Society of Naval Engineers; J. Welles Henderson, Philadelphia Maritime Museum; Herbert Lee Seward, martime consultant and professor emeritus of Mechanical and Marine Engineering, Yale University; Ruth White; Richmond D. Williams, Eleutherian Mills Historical Library, Wilmington, Delaware; C. Harold Berry, Gordon McKay, professor of Mechanical Engineering emeritus, Harvard University; Professor Ari Hoogenboom, Pennsylvania State University; the staff of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers; and Harry E. P. Meislahn, headmaster of the Albany Academy.

      I would especially like to acknowledge the assistance and encouragement I have received from Rear Admiral John D. Hayes, U. S. Navy (Retired), Annapolis, Maryland. Leonard A. Swann, Jr., whose Harvard University doctoral dissertation on John Roach took him through much of the same source material and posed many of the same problems that I encountered, offered suggestions and interpretations of great value for my understanding Isherwood’s role in naval affairs after the Civil War. Robert G. Albion, Gardiner professor of Oceanic History and Affairs emeritus, Harvard University, liberally contributed his extensive knowledge of naval history in all of its aspects to enrich my presentation and to clarify my perception of the naval career of Benjamin Isherwood.

       Hartford, ConnecticutFebruary, 1965

       Illustrations

       (following page 146)

       Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles

       John Lenthall

       Edward Nicoll Dickerson

       John Ericsson

       Gustavus Vasa Fox, assistant secretary of the Navy

       The Sloop-of-War Wampanoag

       General Plan of the Wampanoag’s Boiler and Engine Rooms

       Longitudinal View of the Main Boilers

       Cross Sectional View of the Main Boilers

       A Page Reproduced from Cassier’s Magazine

       Rear Admiral Benjamin Franklin Isherwood, United States Navy

      BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ISHERWOOD NAVAL ENGINEER

       I. The New Engineer in Chief

      Abraham Lincoln, busy with the mass of executive nominations required of a newly inaugurated President, sent a short note, on March 22, 1861, to his Secretary of the Navy, Gideon Welles.

      Sir: I understand there is a vacancy in the office of Engineer-in-Chief of the Navy,


Скачать книгу