The Measurement of Intelligence. Lewis M. Terman

The Measurement of Intelligence - Lewis M. Terman


Скачать книгу
age resulting at any point from the provisional arrangement of tests was too high or too low, it was only necessary to change the location of certain of the tests, or to change the standard of scoring, until an order of arrangement and a standard of passing were found which would throw the median mental age where it belonged. We had already become convinced, for reasons too involved for presentation here, that no satisfactory revision of the Binet scale was possible on any theoretical considerations as to the percentage of passes which an individual test ought to show in a given year in order to be considered standard for that year.

      As was to be expected, the first draft of the revision did not prove satisfactory. The scale was still too hard at some points, and too easy at others. In fact, three successive revisions were necessary, involving three separate scorings of the data and as many tabulations of the mental ages, before the desired degree of accuracy was secured. As finally revised, the scale gives a median intelligence quotient closely approximating 100 for the unselected children of each age from 4 to 14.

      Since our school children who were above 14 years and still in the grades were retarded left-overs, it was necessary to base the revision above this level on the tests of adults. These included 30 business men and 150 “migrating” unemployed men tested by Mr. H. E. Knollin, 150 adolescent delinquents tested by Mr. J. Harold Williams, and 50 high-school students tested by the writer.

      The extension of the scale in the upper range is such that ordinarily intelligent adults, little educated, test up to what is called the “average adult” level. Adults whose intelligence is known from other sources to be superior are found to test well up toward the “superior adult” level, and this holds whether the subjects in question are well educated or practically unschooled. The almost entirely unschooled business men, in fact, tested fully as well as high-school juniors and seniors.

Fig. 1. DISTRIBUTION OF MENTAL AGES OF 62 NORMAL ADULTS
13 to 13 11 14 to 14 11 15 to 15 11 17 to 17 11 18 to 18 11
1.6% 17.7% 59.7% 16.2% 4.8%

      The following method was employed for determining the validity of a test. The children of each age level were divided into three groups according to intelligence quotient, those testing below 90, those between 90 and 109, and those with an intelligence quotient of 110 or above. The percentages of passes on each individual test at or near that age level were then ascertained separately for these three groups. If a test fails to show a decidedly higher proportion of passes in the superior I Q group than in the inferior I Q group, it cannot be regarded as a satisfactory test of intelligence. On the other hand, a test which satisfies this criterion must be accepted as valid or the entire scale must be rejected. Henceforth it stands or falls with the scale as a whole.

      When tried out by this method, some of the tests which have been most criticized showed a high degree of reliability; certain others which have been considered excellent proved to be so little correlated with intelligence that they had to be discarded.

      After making a few necessary eliminations, 90 tests remained, or 36 more than the number included in the Binet 1911 scale. There are 6 at each age level from 3 to 10, 8 at 12, 6 at 14, 6 at “average adult,” 6 at “superior adult,” and 16 alternative tests. The alternative tests, which are distributed among the different groups, are intended to be used only as substitutes when one or more of the regular tests have been rendered, by coaching or otherwise, undesirable.[17]

      Of the 36 new tests, 27 were added and standardized in the various Stanford investigations. Two tests were borrowed from the Healy-Fernald series, one from Kuhlmann, one was adapted from Bonser, and the remaining five were amplifications or adaptations of some of the earlier Binet tests.

      Following is a complete list of the tests of the Stanford revision. Those designated al. are alternative tests. The guide for giving and scoring the tests is presented at length in Part II of this volume.

       The Stanford revision and extension

      1 Year III. (6 tests, 2 months each.)Points to parts of body. (3 to 4.)Nose; eyes; mouth; hair.Names familiar objects. (3 to 5.)Key, penny, closed knife, watch, pencil.Pictures, enumeration or better. (At least 3 objects enumerated in one picture.)(a) Dutch Home; (b) River Scene; (c) Post-Office.Gives sex.Gives last name.Repeats 6 to 7 syllables. (1 to 3.)Al. Repeats 3 digits. (1 success in 3 trials. Order correct.)

      2 Year IV. (6 tests, 2 months each.)Compares lines. (3 trials, no error.)Discrimination of forms. (Kuhlmann.) (Not over 3 errors.)Counts 4 pennies. (No error.)Copies square. (Pencil. 1 to 3.)Comprehension, 1st degree. (2 to 3.) (Stanford addition.)“What must you do”: “When you are sleepy?” “Cold?” “Hungry?”Repeats 4 digits. (1 to 3. Order correct.) (Stanford addition.)Al. Repeats 12 to 13 syllables. (1 to 3 absolutely correct, or 2 with 1 error each.)

      3 Year V. (6 tests, 2 months each.)Comparison of weights. (2 to 3.)3–15; 15–3; 3–15.Colors. (No error.)Red; yellow; blue; green.Æsthetic comparison. (No error.)Definitions, use or better. (4 to 6.)Chair; horse; fork; doll; pencil; table.Patience, or divided rectangle. (2 to 3 trials. 1 minute each.)Three commissions. (No error. Order correct.)Al. Age.

      4 Year VI. (6 tests, 2 months each.)Right and left. (No error.)Right hand; left ear; right eye.Mutilated pictures. (3 to 4 correct.)Counts 13 pennies. (1 to 2 trials, without error.)Comprehension, 2d degree. (2 to 3.) “What’s the thing for you to do”:“If it is raining when you start to school?”“If you find that your house is on fire?”“If you are going some place and miss your car?”Coins. (3 to 4.)Nickel; penny; quarter; dime.Repeats 16 to 18 syllables. (1 to 3 absolutely correct, or 2 with 1 error each.)Al. Morning or afternoon.

      5 Year VII. (6 tests, 2 months each.)Fingers. (No error.) Right; left; both.Pictures, description or better. (Over half of performance description:) Dutch Home; River Scene; Post-Office.Repeats 5 digits. (1 to 3. Order correct.)Ties bow-knot. (Model shown. 1 minute.) (Stanford addition.)Gives differences. (2 to 3.)Fly and butterfly; stone and egg;


Скачать книгу