Новая Земля. New Earth. Лим Ворд
Taimyr? The land of Franz Josef? Alas, everywhere there, between the ruins of the Gulag are already ponatykany military bases, protected areas, submachine gunners, dogs, and then. It’s boring. Everywhere they will get it, they say, you have to pay a fine, give business, not live, and live, be checked, controlled, served, curved and obeyed. It’s the same in the East, somewhere in Siberia, in Kamchatka, in the South, in the West… Wherever fields, forests, vacant lots, abandoned villages and unoccupied monotowns are now stretching, everywhere, it turns out, there are masters. It only seems that they are not. Start something here to do – they will appear (so untidy and unpleasant), and they will say that in fact, everything is their property.
As you know, the American… Australian, New Zealand, other Anglo-Saxon colonists declared the lands «Terra Nulius», that is to say, tied territories, they mastered. After that, according to Gomstead, these large pieces of land, marked by settlers, were given to them in perpetual possession at the end of the five-year period of a completely sparing lease. Indians, other people… the government could not claim them. To redeem, lure (during the Great Depression) – yes, but no longer take it «because we so suddenly wanted» – already.
Sometimes the land was bought from the leaders, who are in considerable alcoholic intoxication. For the beads, knives, mirror and alcohol. Already forever. After this symbolic act, the Indian tribes could be evicted, like the tenants from the apartment they sold. The White colonists of North America were not interested in Indians as citizens of a new country. For life aborigines were allocated reservations – territories with a special status, which are considered, perhaps, not quite America. If necessary, the boundaries of these settlements could be revised.
In the Russian Empire, the tsar was always happy to acquire territories – Siberia, Asia, already quite densely populated. The colonial movement of the Russian people was carried out insofar as. The reason for this is the primordial alienation of power from the people. The first princes, the ruling elite, according to historiography – «Varangians», aliens, warriors-plunderers of Scandinavia. The most famous Rurikovich, Ivan the Terrible, in conversations with foreigners, sometimes identifies himself with letters only with them… sometimes with the Germans, but does not want a Russian (except in the official title).
The second and last Russian dynasty ceases to be Russian with Peter the Great. The Tsar emperor communicates only in German… marries an uneducated Lithuanian or German woman, concludes the first, Russian wife Yevdokia Lopukhin in a monastery, etc. In essence, the accomplishments of the predecessors – the kings of Mikhail, Fedor, Alexei – the annexation of Ukraine, quite successful wars with Poland, Turkey (Chigirinsky campaigns), regiments of the new system, not a weak economy, developing cooperation with countries of Western Europe, its chroniclers are artificially obscured. With Peter III Russia ruled the German dynasty Holstein-Gottorp. Having defeated Crimea from the Ottoman Empire, Catherine II inhabits it with those who did not deserve the Russians (for example, retired soldiers, as was practiced in ancient Rome), but related ethnic Germans. These people arrange a semblance of paradise on the peninsula… plant luxurious gardens… do not pay taxes, enjoy freedom of trade, movement. Again, unlike the inhabitants of Central Russia, 95% of whom are now slaves. In the same Ancient Rome, slavery was often a test, for forging citizens who could fully appreciate the taste of freedom. Here, with a less sophisticated government, this is not so.
Inside Russia, rulers can not find a couple for a formal marriage. Empress Elizabeth Petrovna secretly crowned with Alexei Razumovsky… the son of the Dnieper Cossack, but the fruit of their love, the notorious Elizaveta of Vladimir perishes in the casemate of the Peter and Paul Fortress. The daughter of the secret marriage of Catherine II and Grigory Potemkin, or their son, Alexei (Bobrinsky) become bastards, courtiers of the second echelon. The dynasty is impregnated with foreign blood, and has no inflow of Russian blood.
In Central Europe, Russian princesses marry monarchs, princes, counts of principalities and middle-kingdoms, merge with the environment, and Russia’s interests do not represent. And, it is hardly possible to remember the Russian prince, who became the king of at least a dwarf European monarchy.
Starting with Peter the Great, Russia participates in European wars without the slightest benefit for itself (the people), or even soldiers. The apogee of the insane waste of blood reaches under Alexander the First, fighting with Napoleonic France for the interests of Britain and the German principalities, outside of Russia.
Joseph Dzhugashvili, a Caucasian, indifferently meets the news that millions of Russian (Ukrainian, Kuban, Transcaucasian, Kazakh) farmers, and their children, are dying of hunger. The main thing for him, and many people in the near-term circle of communication – his own greatness, militaristic aspirations, abstract schemes of world governance, and not the voice of the people. The native Georgians remain outside the collective farm system… in contrast to 80% of Russians have passports and freedom of movement. Thanks to the high purchase prices for agricultural products produced by the Center, they are the most prosperous group of the population of the USSR.
Approximately the same applies to another ethnic group, natives of Russia once, but almost always hostile to Poland.
Blood, genetics, defining the spirit, the style of communication, preferences… axiomatic love is important.
How, perhaps, to buy from the unfriendly to the Russian Federation land for Our America, so that we, simple people, «pour» there? And, how do you define the concept of «Russian»?! How much is it generally speaking ethical and acceptable for us – to distinguish people according to biological, hereditary characteristics? This seems very strange.
Nevertheless, a clear division into one’s own and another’s exists in modern, democratic and developed countries. If you, according to the necessary set of documents – ethnic (Volga) German – welcome to the Federal Republic of Germany. Here, social benefits, if you do not want to work right away, housing, language courses, a pension, and so on. But of course, Russian, Kazakh, Evenk, no matter how good they are, nothing like this is proposed.
The Jews. The state organization for repatriation is satisfied with your documents, name, eye color, lip line, nose shape, certificates of sponsors? Can you pronounce the faith in Hebrew? Shalom Aleichem Israel!
Also, throughout the world there are specialized kindergartens, schools, where children are accepted exclusively on this national basis. Other boys and girls are not allowed to enter these institutions. Does the international community regard this as nationalism or Nazism? No.
As you know, in Russia it is considered shameful to allocate Russians. Who is «Russian»? A citizen of Russian Federation? A Europe? Well, and Eskimos, Evenks, Buryats – they are not worthy of aliyah within the Russian Federation? So this will violate the unity of the Russian people and interethnic harmony?!
On the one hand, the high inclination of Russians to interethnic marriages is good. The composition of the people is, as it were, leveled. Something similar is in China, where genetically, people are homogeneous (and this is not particularly complex). Certainly, although there are special economic zones in the Middle Kingdom, there are, in principle, two seemingly incompatible systems of national republics. Just like, and in another country with a strong economy – the US. And Europe is completely homogeneous. The notion of a «European» as a citizen of social education from Gibraltar to the borders of Russia or Poland is born in the time of Caesar, fairly smoothed the national composition of Italy and Gaul, or Charlemagne, at the beginning of the Middle Ages. Many small tribes are forcibly, or under the influence of serious social institutions, they are deprived of their «own» lands and are pouring into a kind of heterogeneous, but still unified community.
So much has already been written, but we have not approached the main question. Is it necessary to distinguish and strengthen the core of the nation «Russians» in terms of biological characteristics, style of behavior (which, as we have shown, can be productive), or as before, without preference to anyone, to live in an averaged state with national republics? And yes, where is that territory on which it would be possible to build