A Guide to the Scientific Career. Группа авторов
Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (11): 2326.
23 Jacsó, P. (2008). The plausibility of computing the h‐index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference‐enhanced databases. Online Information Review 32 (2): 266–283.
24 Jin, B.‐H. (2006). H‐index: an evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus 1 (1): 8–9.
25 Jin, B.‐H. , Liang, L. , Rousseau, R. et al. (2007). The R‐ and AR‐ indices: complementing the h‐index. Chinese Science Bulletin 52: 855–863.
26 Kelly, C.D. and Jennions, M.D. (2006). The h‐index and career assessment by numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21 (4): 167–170.
27 Kosmulski, M. (2006). A new Hirsch‐type index saves time and works equally well as the original h‐index. ISSI Newsletter 2 (3): 4–6.
28 Kosmulski, M. (2007). MAXPROD: a new index for assessment of the scientific output of an individual, and a comparison with the h‐index. International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics 11 (1): 5.
29 Malesios, C.C. and Psarakis, S. (2014). Comparison of the h‐index for different fields of research using bootstrap methodology. Quality & Quantity 48 (1): 521–545.
30 McIntyre, K.M. , Hawkes, I. , Waret‐Szkuta, A. et al. (2011). The h‐index as a quantitative indicator of the relative impact of human diseases. PLoS One 6 (5): e19558.
31 Meho, L.I. (2007). The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World 29 (1): 32–36.
32 Meho, L. and Rogers, Y. (2008). Citation counting, citation ranking, and h‐index of human–computer interaction researchers: a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (11): 1711–1726.
33 Meho, L.I. and Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science vs. Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (13): 2105–2125.
34 Miller, C.W. (2006). Superiority of the h‐index over the Impact Factor for Physics, arXiv: physics / 0608183.
35 Norris, M. and Oppenheim, C. (2010). The h‐index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator. Journal of Documentation 66 (5): 681–705.
36 Panaretos, J. and Malesios, C.C. (2009). Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices. Scientometrics 81 (3): 635–670.
37 Panaretos, J. and Malesios, C.C. (2012). Influential mathematicians: birth, education and affiliation. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 59 (2): 274–286.
38 Penner, O. , Pan, R.K. , Petersen, A.M. et al. (2013). On the predictability of future impact in science. Scientific Reports 3: 3052.
39 Prathap, G. (2010). Is there a place for a mock h‐index? Scientometrics 84: 153–165.
40 Sanderson, M. (2008). Revisiting h measured on UK LIS academics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (7): 1184–1190.
41 Schreiber, M. (2007). Self‐citation corrections for the Hirsch index. EPL 78: 30002, 1–6.
42 Schreiber, M. (2008a). A modification of the h‐index: the h m ‐index accounts for multi‐authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics 2 (3): 211–216.
43 Schreiber, M. (2008b). An empirical investigation of the g‐index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h‐index, the A‐index, and the R‐index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (9): 1513–1522.
44 Schreiber, M. , Malesios, C.C. , and Psarakis, S. (2011). Categorizing Hirsch index variants. Research Evaluation 20 (5): 397–409.
45 Schreiber, M. , Malesios, C.C. , and Psarakis, S. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis for the Hirsch index, 17 h‐type variants and some traditional bibliometric indicators. Journal of Informetrics 6: 347–358.
46 Schubert, A. (2007). Successive h‐indices. Scientometrics 70 (1): 201–205.
47 Silagadze, Z.K. (2010). Citation entropy and research impact estimation. Acta Physica Polonica B 41: 2325–2333.
48 Sypsa, V. and Hatzakis, A. (2009). Assessing the impact of biomedical research in academic institutions of disparate sizes. BMC Medical Research Methodology 9: 33.
49 Tol, R.S.J. (2009). The h‐index and its alternatives: an application to the 100 most prolific economists. Scientometrics 80 (2): 317–324.
50 Van Eck, N.L. and Waltman, L. (2008). Generalizing the h‐ and g‐indices. Journal of Informetrics 2 (4): 263–271.
51 Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Testing the validity of the Hirsch‐index for research assessment purposes. Research Evaluation 17 (2): 157–160.
52 Van Parijs, P. (2009). European higher education under the spell of university rankings. Ethical Perspectives 16 (2): 189–206.
53 Vinkler, P. (2007). Eminence of scientists in the light of the h‐index and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science 33: 481–491.
54 Vinkler, P. (2009). The π‐index: a new indicator for assessing scientific impact. Journal of Information Science 35: 602–612.
55 Waltman, L. and vanEck, N.J. (2012). The inconsistency of the h‐index. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology 63 (2): 406–415.
56 Wu, Q. (2010). The w‐index: a measure to assess scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61: 609–614.
57 Zhang, C.T. (2009). The e‐index, complementing the h‐index for excess citations. PLoS One 4: e5429.
58 Zhang, C.T. (2013). The h‐index, effectively improving the h‐index based on the citation distribution. PLos One 8 (4): e59912.
Further Reading
1 Bastian, S. , Ippolito, J.A. , Lopez, S.A. et al. (2017). The use of the h‐index in academic orthopaedic surgery. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (American Volume) 99 (4): e14.
2 Bornmann, L. , Mutz, R. , Daniel, H.‐D. et al. (2009). Are there really two types of h‐index variants? A validation study by using molecular life sciences data. Research Evaluation 18 (3): 185–190.
3 Dunnick, N.R. (2017). The h‐index in perspective. Academic Radiology 24 (2): 117–118.
4 Masic, I. (2016). Scientometric analysis: a technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers. Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice 5 (1): 1–6.
5 Saraykar, S. , Saleh, A. , and Selek, S. (2017). The association between NIMH funding and h‐index in psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0654-4.
6 Ruscio, J. (2016). Taking advantage of citation measures of scholarly impact: hip hip h‐index! Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (6): 905–908.
Notes
1Available from http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm.2Available from http://www.paked.net/higher_education/rankings/rankings.htm.3Available from www.webometrics.info.4Available from http://www.mines-paristech.eu/About-us/Rankings/professional-ranking.