The Autobiography of Mother Jones. Mother Jones
tion>
Mother Jones
The Autobiography of Mother Jones
Published by
Books
- Advanced Digital Solutions & High-Quality eBook Formatting -
2020 OK Publishing
EAN 4064066394578
Table of Contents
Chapter II. The Haymarket Tragedy
Chapter III. A Strike in Virginia
Chapter IV. Wayland's Appeal to Reason
Chapter VI. War in West Virginia
Chapter VIII. Roosevelt Sent for John Mitchell
Chapter IX. Murder in West Virginia
Chapter X. The March of the Mill Children
Chapter XI. Those Mules Won't Scab Today
Chapter XII. How the Women Mopped Up Coaldale
Chapter XIII. The Cripple Creek Strike (1903)
Chapter XV. Moyer, Haywood and Pettibone
Chapter XVI. The Mexican Revolution
Chapter XVII. How the Women Sang Themselves Out of Jail
Chapter XVIII. Victory in West Virginia
Chapter XIX. Guards and Gunmen
Chapter XXI. In Rockefeller's Prisons
Chapter XXII. "You Don't Need a Vote to Raise Hell"
Chapter XXIII. A West Virginia Prison Camp
Chapter XXIV. The Steel Strike of 1919
Chapter XXV. Struggle and Lose: Struggle and Win
Chapter XXVI. Medieval West Virginia
Chapter XXVII. Progress in Spite of Leaders
Mother Jones' Latest Photograph
INTRODUCTION
Mother Jones is one of the most forceful and picturesque figures of the American labor movement. She is a born crusader. In an earlier period of the world she would have joined with Peter the Hermit in leading the crusaders against the Saracens. At a later period, she would have joined John Brown in his mad, heroic effort to liberate the slaves. Like Brown, she has a singleness of purpose, a personal fearlessness, and a contempt for established wrongs. Like him, the purpose was the moving force, and the means of accomplishing the end did not matter.
In her early life, she found in the labor movement an outlet for her inherent sympathy and love and daring. She never had the time or the education to study the philosophy of the various movements that from time to time have inspired the devoted idealist to lead what seemed to be a forlorn hope to change the institutions of men.
Mother Jones is essentially an individualist. Her own emotions and ideas are so strong that she is sometimes in conflict with others, fighting for the same cause. This too is an old story; the real leaders of any cause are necessarily individualists and are often impatient of others who likewise must go in their own way. All movements attract men and women of various minds. The early abolitionists could not agree as to methods. In their crusade were found the men who believed in constitutional methods, such as Giddings and Lincoln; the men who believed in force, of which John Brown was the chief; the non-resistant, like William Lloyd Garrison; the lone individualist who hit wherever he found a head to hit, like Wendell Phillips. Mother Jones is the Wendell Phillips of the labor movement. Without his education and scholarship, she has the power of moving masses of men by her strong, living speech and action. She has likewise his disregard for personal safety. After the capture of John Brown at Harper's Ferry, many real abolitionists were paralyzed with fear and fled from the field, but Wendell Phillips hurled his phillipics from the housetops and defied his enemies to do their worst.
In all her career, Mother Jones never quailed or ran away. Her deep convictions and fearless soul always drew her to seek the spot where the fight was hottest and the danger greatest.
I never personally knew anything of her misunderstandings with John Mitchell, but it seems only fair for me to say that I was associated with him for many months in the arbitration growing out of the coal strike. We were friends for many years and he always had my full respect and trust. I cannot help feeling that both were true and that the disagreements were only such as inevitably grow out of close association of different types of mind in a great conflict.
Mother Jones was always doubtful of the good of organized institutions. These require compromises and she could not compromise. To her there was but one side. Right and wrong were forever distinct. The type is common to all great movements. It is essentially the difference between the man of action and the philosopher.