Bovine Reproduction. Группа авторов
in the bull the reader is referred to a series of articles by Amann [152], Berndtson and Desjardins [153], and Johnson et al. [154].
Figure 2.5 Schematic representation of spermatozoa reflecting visible changes as they migrate from the rete testis through the caput (head), corpus (body), and cauda (tail) regions of the epididymis to the ejaculate. Sperm found in the rete testis, efferent ducts, and caput epididymis are identified by the proximal nature of the protoplasmic droplet, while in sperm in the distal caput through to the corpus epididymis the protoplasmic droplet has translocated to the bend of the flagellum; by the time the spermatozoa reach the cauda epididymis the droplet has located at the distal portion of the middle piece of the flagellum (a). Schematic representations of ejaculated normal and autolysis spermatozoa are shown in (b). Normal sperm show an intact acrosome in the form of the apical ridge along the apical edge of the spermatozoan head, while the spermatozoan head images to the right show examples of false or premature acrosomal reactions typically associated with dead or dying spermatozoa. The paddle‐shaped nature of the bovine spermatozoon is shown in (c).
Source:[151], © 2003, Germinal Dimensions Incorporated.
Seminiferous Epithelial Cycle and Wave of Spermatogenesis
The cycle of the seminiferous epithelium refers to a cohort of germ cells that progress by clonal expansion within a segment of the seminiferous tubule and change in synchrony with other layers over time through a series of well‐characterized cellular associations referred to as stages [35, 149]. Cross‐sections along the length of the seminiferous tubules will have different morphological appearances, but within a given section the cellular activity will be similar. Successive sections of the seminiferous tubules will have cohorts of germ cells at sequential stages of development with repetition, thus producing a “wave” effect along the seminiferous tubules [35]. Germ cell development progresses from the basal lamina of the seminiferous tubule, and cells migrate toward the tubule lumen and not in a lat eral direction. This synchronous behavior is thought to be associated with biochemical signaling facilitated by the intercellular bridges, but the process is not fully understood. In the bull, it takes about 4.5 cycles of the seminiferous epithelium to complete spermatogenesis, and each cycle is estimated to take approximately 13.5 days, thus requiring 61 days to complete the process [152, 154]. Spermatogenesis continues throughout the natural lifespan of the postpubertal bull. The domestic bull attains puberty at approximately 10–12 months of age when mature sperm begin to appear in the ejaculate. It is estimated that the daily sperm output of the dairy bull is approximately eight billion and approximately seven billion in the beef bull, with the level of production of spermatozoa increasing from puberty to maximum potential at approximately three years of age. The productivity potential of a bull is determined by the size of the testes, which may be breed dependent, and is thought to be related to being a component of Sertoli cell volume within the seminiferous tubules. Hence, breeding soundness examinations of bulls to be used as sires is dependent not only on sperm quality but also on testicular size and volume [155].
References
1 1 Pritchard, J. (1955). Ancient Near Eastern Texts (Relating to the Old Testament), 2e, 159–222. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2 2 Steinach, E. (1940). Sex and Life: Forty Years of Biological and Medical Experiments. New York: Viking Press.
3 3 Bremner, W. (1981). Historical aspects of the study of the testis. In: The Testis (eds. H.G. Burger and D.M. de Kretser), 1–8. New York: Raven Press.
4 4 de Graaf, R. (1972). Treatise on the human reproductive organs (translated by Jocelyn and Setchell). J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 17: 1–64.
5 5 Eik‐Nes, K. (1975). Biosynthesis and secretion of testicular steroids. In: Handbook of Physiology, Section 7, vol. V (eds. D.W. Hamilton and R.O. Greep), 467–483. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society.
6 6 Leydig, F. (1850). Zur anatomie der manlichen geslechtsargane und analdrusen de saugethiere. Z. Wiss. Zool. 2: 1.
7 7 Sertoli, E. (1865). De l'esistenza di particulari cellulae ramificatai new canalicoli seminiferi del l'testicolo umano. Morgagni 7: 31–40.
8 8 Christensen, A. (1975). Leydig cells. In: Handbook of Physiology, Section 7, vol. V (eds. D.W. Hamilton and R.O. Greep), 57–94. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society.
9 9 Fawcett, D. (1975). Ultrastructure and function of the Sertoli cell. In: Handbook of Physiology, Section 7, vol. V (eds. D.W. Hamilton and R.O. Greep), 21–55. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society.
10 10 Parkes, A. (1966). The internal secretions of the testis. In: Marshall's Physiology of Reproduction, vol. III (ed. A. Parkes), 412–569. London: Longmans.
11 11 David, K., Dingemanse, E., Freud, J., and Laque, F. (1935). Uber krystellinishces manliches hormone aus hoden (testosteron), wirksamer als aus harn oder uas cholesterin bereitestes androsteron. Z. Physiol. Chem. 233: 281.
12 12 Smith, P. (1930). Hypophysectomy and replacement therapy in the rat. Am. J. Anat. 45: 205–273.
13 13 Greep, R., Fevold, H., and Hisaw, F. (1936). Effects of two hypophyseal hormones on the reproductive system of the mare rat. Anat. Rec. 65: 261–271.
14 14 Greep, R. and Fevold, H. (1937). The spermatogenic and secretory functions of the gonads of hypophysectomized adult rats tested with pituitary FSH and LH. Endocrinology 21: 611–618.
15 15 Hooker, C. (1994). The postnatal history and function of the interstitial cell of the testis of the bull. Am. J. Anat. 74: 1–37.
16 16 Steinberger, A., Walther, J., Heindel, K. et al. (1979). Hormone interactions in Sertoli cells. in vitro 15: 23–31.
17 17 de Kretser, D., Kerr, J., Rich, K. et al. (1980). Hormonal factors involved in normal spermatogenesis and following the disruption of spermatogenesis. In: Testicular Development, Structure and Function (eds. A. Steinberger and S. Steinberger), 107–115. New York: Raven Press.
18 18 Bearden, H., Fuquay, J., and Willard, S. (2004). The male reproductive system. In: Applied Animal Reproduction, 6e, 22–35. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
19 19 Setchell, B., Maddocks, S., and Brooks, D. (1993). Anatomy, vasculature, innervation and fluids of the male reproductive tract. In: Physiology of Reproduction, vol. I (eds. E. Knobil and J.D. Neill), 1063–1176. New York: Raven Press.
20 20 Bardin, C., Cheng, C., Mustow, N., and Gunsalus, G. (1993). The Sertoli cell. In: Physiology of Reproduction, vol. I (eds. E. Knobil and J.D. Neill), 1291–1336. New York: Raven Press.
21 21 Senger, P. (2003). The organization and function of the male reproductive system. In: Pathways to Pregnancy and Parturition, 2e, 44–79. Redmond, OR: Current Conceptions Inc.
22 22 Wyrost, P., Radek, J., and Radek, T. (1990). Morphology and development of the bovine testicular artery during fetal and neonatal periods [in Polish]. Pol. Arch. Weter. 30: 39–56.
23 23 Kastelic, J., Cook, R., and Coulter, G. (1997). Scrotal/testicular thermoregulation and the effects of increased testicular temperature in the bull. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 13: 271–282.
24 24 Fawcett, D., Long, J., and Jones, A. (1969). The ultrastructure of the endocrine glands. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 25: 314–368.
25 25 Hooker, C. (1970). The intertubular tissue of the testis. In: The Testis, vol. I (eds. A.D. Johnson, W.R. Gomes and N.L. Van Demark), 483–550. New York: Academic Press.
26 26 Christensen, A. (2007). A history of the Leydig cell. In: The Leydig Cell in Health and Disease (eds. A.H. Payne and M.P. Hardy), 3–30. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
27 27 Stewart,