Beyond Emotional Intelligence. S. Michele Nevarez
response: “Hold up! If it's not too late, I'd like to amend my order. I'll take a tall, two-shot pity, half-pump empathy, slightly forced smile, please.” Okay, so maybe an instance of emotion isn't quite like ordering your beverage of choice, but hopefully you get the idea. The brain isn't purely reacting to its external environment; it's predicting and adjusting, calibrating its perceptions as it goes, based on its prior experiences and what it perceives by way of sensory inputs in the moment.
Within the classical view, emotions have been carefully classified and categorized much like a dried-flower or bug collection. Each person—irrespective of culture, geography, upbringing, language, or context—comes prepackaged with a repertoire, an arsenal as it were, of emotions that are consistently experienced and unilaterally identifiable, bearing telltale physiological markers and facial expressions. In the classical understanding, emotions are triggered by external events, and we respond reactively based on a model of the brain as having specific regions that separately oversee our emotions, our higher-level executive center governing rational thought, and our fight-or-flight response mechanism, a throwback to our reptilian predecessors—each distinct area of the brain forever locked in a head-over-heart, stimulus-response tug-of-war. There is also the belief that through cognitive control alone we can bring our emotions under our obeisance, like spirits we summon at a séance, if we just try hard enough.
In contrast, in the constructed view of emotion, the brain constructs instances of emotion, drawing from prior experiences in similar contexts. Our brain casts its bets on what will happen next, setting into motion a response sequence before actually knowing what will happen next. As the brain calibrates its predictions with input from our interoceptive sensations and senses, it fine-tunes its perceptions and corrects for prediction error. In this view of emotions, they do not have an identifiable essence, nor are they universally distinguishable by certain facial expressions or biological markers. Instead, the interoceptive networks of the brain produce our perceptions and emotions through a process of degeneracy in which the brain relies upon different and varied core systems in the brain to produce instances of emotion. Words and concepts not only play a critical role in helping us contextualize and make sense of our perceptions and emotions, but they help us sync up with the experiences of those around us. In this manner, we arrive at a shared picture of reality in which we can effectively communicate with one another about what we perceive and how we feel. Through our brain's capacity for statistical learning and simulation, it dutifully constructs an emergent reality, including our perception of a self.
If indeed the meaning we assign our emotions take their lead from our prior experiences and expectations, shaped and reinforced by concepts that have been modeled for us time and again, then in my estimation we can become cognizant of the mental models influencing how we perpetually and habitually make sense of them. We can decide whether the initial meaning our brain has assigned is the interpretation we'll stick with as well as how we will choose to relate to our real-time sensory experience of our emotions. This prospect is both encouraging and daunting. Encouraging because it means we can unlearn what we were taught we should feel relative to what may be culturally or contextually appropriate in any given situation, and daunting because that's potentially a lot of unlearning we may need to undertake to retrofit and cultivate the kinds of experiences that are more conducive for our aims. Regardless of whether we ascribe to the classical or constructed view of emotions, the end result is mostly the same from a practical standpoint. We still have to deal with how our emotions make us feel and be strategic about the sense we subsequently make of them. That said, the two theories do have varied implications for how we might go about working with our emotions and thus yield different strategies we might use to do so. If we think emotions are fixed, we have far less wiggle room when it comes to how we handle them. But if we know our emotions are constructed and more fluid, then we can assign them whatever meaning we like—that is, if we create the habit of doing so.
Where Does That Leave Us? On an Emotional Cliffhanger
Our emotions are more elaborate than they are simple. Irrespective of the mechanisms by which they arrive or what names we give them when they do, the bottom line is, emotions are a pervasive hallmark of our experience. Their presence acts as a kind of invisible yet palpable navigation system guiding our response. But because we can't see them nor are we fully versed in their detection or intervention, they often elude our conscious awareness and therefore our inclination to recategorize or reframe them. That is where the 12 Self-Discoveries come into play. They provide us with quick methods to spot when our interpretation of them is or isn't helpful, pointing out common mental pitfalls we may be succumbing to and remedies for when we do. Our mental outlook and what unfolds within our mind's ecosystem have a profound impact on us, not just physically but psychologically. What's more, our emotions impact how we make decisions and predispose the course of action we're likely to take as a result of how we interpret them. Thus, our real-time investigation of our emotions and ability to reinterpret or change our perceptual stance relative to them matters as much as our conceptual and scientific understanding of them. How we experience our emotions, the ways in which they color our outlook, shape our outcomes, and impact our relationships for better or worse mirror back to us the working state of our own emotional intelligence.
Notes
1 1. The 12 competencies are grouped under the four specific domains as follows: Within Self-Awareness is the competency emotional self-awareness. Within the domain of Self-Management are the competencies emotional balance, adaptability, achievement orientation, and positive outlook. Within the domain of Social Awareness are the competencies empathy and organizational awareness. Finally, within the domain of Relationship Management are the competencies influence, coach and mentor, teamwork, conflict management, and inspirational leadership.
2 2. Dr. Richard Davidson goes by the name Richie.
3 3. Richie Davidson is quoted in an article in Mindful regarding the measurable impact of contemplative practice on the brain, “We've shown in the laboratory that meditating for a half hour a day for two weeks is enough to produce changes in the brain” (Delehanty, 2017).
4 4. Lisa Feldman Barrett speaks to the origin of the triune model of the brain, what she terms “one of the most successful misconceptions in human biology,” which she explains begins with a model of the human brain consisting of layers: the innermost geared toward our survival, our alleged emotion system known as the “limbic system” sitting atop that, and finally our allegedly rational and uniquely human cortex wrapped around that (Barrett, 2017).
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.