A History of American Literature. Boynton Percy Holmes

A History of American Literature - Boynton Percy Holmes


Скачать книгу
art and literature has been beyond the control of legislative action. For the first third of the nineteenth century New York was the favored city. Here Irving was born, and here Cooper and Bryant came as young men, rather than to the Philadelphia of Franklin and his contemporaries.

      For these men of New York, America was an accomplished fact – a nation slowly and awkwardly taking its place among the nations of the world. To be sure, the place that Americans wanted to take, following the advice of George Washington, was one of withdrawal from the turmoil of the Old World and of safety from “entangling alliances” which could ever again bring it into the warfare from which it was so glad to be escaping. The Atlantic was immensely broader in those days than now, for its real breadth is to be measured not in miles but in the number of days that it takes to cross it. When Irving went abroad for the first time in 1803 he was fifty-nine days in passage. To-day one can go round the world in considerably less time, and the average fast Atlantic steamship passage is one tenth of that, while the aëroplane flight has divided the time by ten again. So the early Americans rejoiced in their “magnificent isolation” and wanted to grow up as dignified, respected, but very distant neighbors of the Old World.

      It was an unhappy fact, however, that America – or the United States – was not notable for its dignity in the early years of the nineteenth century; for the finest dignity, like charity, “is not puffed up, doth not behave itself unseemly,” whereas the new nation was very self-conscious; quickly irritated at foreign criticism, and uncomfortably aware of its own crudities in manner and defects in character. As far as foreign criticism was concerned, there were ample reasons for annoyance in America. Even as early as 1775 John Trumbull4 had felt that it was hopeless to expect fair treatment at the hands of English reviewers, warning his friends Dwight and Barlow,

      Such men to charm could Homer’s muse avail,

      Who read to cavil, and who write to rail;

      When ardent genius pours the bold sublime,

      Carp at the style, or nibble at the rhyme;

      and the mother country, after the Revolution and the War of 1812, was less inclined than before to deal in compliment. Man after man came over,

      Like Fearon, Ashe, and others we could mention;

      Who paid us friendly visits to abuse

      Our country, and find food for the reviews.5

      Moreover, all the time that England was criticizing her runaway child, she was maddeningly complacent as to her own virtues. Americans could not strike back with any effect, because they could not make the English feel their blows. So they fretted and fumed for half a century, their discomfort finding its clearest expression in Lowell’s lines6:

      She is some punkins, thet I wun’t deny

      (For ain’t she some related to you ’n’ I?)

      But there’s a few small intrists here below

      Outside the counter o’ John Bull an’ Co,

      An’ though they can’t conceit how’t should be so,

      I guess the Lord druv down Creation’s spiles

      ’thout no gret helpin’ from the British Isles,

      An’ could contrive to keep things pooty stiff

      Ef they withdrawed from business in a miff;

      I ha’n’t no patience with sech swellin’ fellers ez

      Think God can’t forge ’thout them to blow the bellerses.

      A further reason for uneasiness in the face of foreign comment was that honest Americans were aware that their country suffered from the crudities of youth. It is unpleasant enough for “Seventeen” to be nagged by an unsympathetic maiden aunt, but it is intolerable if she has some ground for her naggings. In small matters as well as great “conscience doth make cowards of us all.” In a period of such rapid expansion as prevailed in the young manhood of Irving, Cooper, and Bryant it was unavoidable that most of the population were drawn into business undertakings that were usually eager and hurried and that were often slipshod or even shady. The American colleges and their graduates were not as distinguished as they had been in the earlier colonial days, and the new influence of European culture from the Old World universities was yet to come. In the cities, and notably in New York, the vulgar possessors of mushroom fortunes multiplied rapidly, bringing up vapid daughters like Halleck’s “Fanny,”7 who in all the modern languages was

      Exceedingly well-versed; and had devoted

      To their attainment, far more time than has,

      By the best teachers, lately been allotted;

      For she had taken lessons, twice a week,

      For a full month in each; and she could speak

      French and Italian, equally as well

      As Chinese, Portuguese, or German; and,

      What is still more surprising, she could spell

      Most of our longest English words off-hand;

      Was quite familiar in Low Dutch and Spanish,

      And thought of studying modern Greek and Danish;

      and whose father, a man of newly affected silence that spoke “unutterable things,” was established in a mortgaged house filled with servants and “whatever is necessary for a ‘genteel liver’” and buttressed with a coach and half a dozen unpaid-for horses. At the same time the countryside was developing a native but not altogether admirable Yankee type. At their best, Halleck8 wrote,

      The people of today

      Appear good, honest, quiet men enough

      And hospitable too – for ready pay;

      With manners like their roads, a little rough,

      And hands whose grasp is warm and welcoming, though tough.

      And at their worst Whittier9 looked back a half century, to 1818, and recalled them as

      Shrill, querulous women, sour and sullen men,

      Untidy, loveless, old before their time,

      With scarce a human interest save their own

      Monotonous round of small economies,

      Or the poor scandal of the neighborhood;

      Church-goers, fearful of the unseen Powers,

      But grumbling over pulpit tax and pew-rent,

      Saving, as shrewd economists, their souls

      And winter pork, with the least possible outlay

      Of salt and sanctity; in daily life

      Showing as little actual comprehension

      Of Christian charity and love and duty

      As if the Sermon on the Mount had been

      Outdated like a last year’s almanac.

      A natural consequence of such criticism from without, and such raw and defective culture within the country, was that American writers of any moment bided their time as patiently as they could, recognizing that for the moment America must be a nation of workers who were

      rearing the pedestal, broad-based and grand,

      Whereon the fair shapes of the Artist shall stand,

      And creating, through labors undaunted and long,

      The theme for all Sculpture and Painting and Song.10

      Finally,


Скачать книгу

<p>4</p>

Lines addressed to Messrs. Dwight and Barlow.

<p>5</p>

Fitzgreene Halleck, “Fanny,” stanza lviii.

<p>6</p>

Mason and Slidell, ll. 155–165.

<p>7</p>

“Fanny,” stanzas cxxi, cxxii.

<p>8</p>

“Wyoming,” stanza iv.

<p>9</p>

“Among the Hills” (Prelude, 71 ff.).

<p>10</p>

Lowell, “Fable for Critics.”