Ubek. Bogdan Rymanowski
How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
67. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
68. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
69. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
70. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
71. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
72. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Communication intelligence?
<--- Score
73. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Communication intelligence leverage and how?
<--- Score
74. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
75. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
76. How do you manage unclear Communication intelligence requirements?
<--- Score
77. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
78. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
79. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
80. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
81. Is Communication intelligence currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
82. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
83. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
84. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
85. How can the value of Communication intelligence be defined?
<--- Score
86. What would be the goal or target for a Communication intelligence’s improvement team?
<--- Score
87. Is there a Communication intelligence management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
88. Are the Communication intelligence requirements complete?
<--- Score
89. Will a Communication intelligence production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
90. How did the Communication intelligence manager receive input to the development of a Communication intelligence improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
91. What is in scope?
<--- Score
92. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Communication intelligence brings?
<--- Score
93. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
94. How do you catch Communication intelligence definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
95. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
96. Is there a critical path to deliver Communication intelligence results?
<--- Score
97. Has a Communication intelligence requirement not been met?
<--- Score
98. How do you manage changes in Communication intelligence requirements?
<--- Score
99. What are the Communication intelligence use cases?
<--- Score
100. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Communication intelligence? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
101. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
102. What Communication intelligence services do you require?
<--- Score
103. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
104. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
105. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
106. Are accountability and ownership for Communication intelligence clearly defined?
<--- Score
107. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
108. Is Communication intelligence linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
109. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
110. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Communication intelligence changes?
<--- Score
111. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
112. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
113. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
114. Is there any additional Communication intelligence definition of success?
<--- Score
115. How do you hand over Communication intelligence context?
<--- Score
116. What happens if Communication intelligence’s scope changes?
<--- Score
117. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
118. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
119.