Mediating Multiculturalism. Daniella Trimboli

Mediating Multiculturalism - Daniella Trimboli


Скачать книгу
mentioned the lack of intervention and care from onlookers or witnesses. This apathy was felt even though the attacks often took place in public areas, such as roads, transportation, shopping centres or at work (ibid.).

      The lack of intervention by individuals and representatives of institutions (police officers, politicians) fulfil ‘the collective nature of mechanisms of conversion’ or the active process through which bodies are marked as human or otherwise (ibid.). Immediately after the Cronulla riots the prime minister of the time, John Howard, denied they were a result of racism – a denial Bowen reaffirms years later in his 2011 multiculturalism speech.

      Conclusion

      There has been a shifting ecology of liberal multiculturalism in the twenty-first century, including the eruption of the term ‘cultural diversity’ in multicultural discourses. A range of moving factors has culminated in multiculturalism entering a mode of crisis in the twenty-first century, leading to two main approaches to its study. The first approach has been to emphasise the positive aspects of multiculturalism, often with a focus on the richness that cultural diversity adds to society. The second approach is more critical, working to illustrate the complexities and issues of multiculturalism as a societal phenomenon. Often, this latter approach moves discussions of cultural difference beyond the framework of multiculturalism altogether, either in the form of a complete renunciation or as a subtle but evident departure.

      There are clearly micro and macro/private and public levels to the normalisation of racism – on the ground in which the racist altercations or tensions take place, and within the broader systems of power and sociality that support (sometimes simply by overlooking) these incidences. Tabar et al. (2010, p. 159) emphasise the importance of this relationship, ‘crucial not just because of the ways in which it structures the fields of significant social power […] but because it also shapes the forms of conversion in everyday life’. Perhaps the most problematic aspect of arguments like that posited by O’Connor and Araeen is their failure to consider the productive work that occurs between the ‘on-the-ground’ cultural differences and the institutions that drive it.

      The study of multiculturalism is not ready to be abandoned, but it does need to be reconceptualised in broader terms. A brief overview of governmental and theoretical forms of multiculturalism indicates that questions of white managerialism continue to plague both the conceptualisations and material implications of multicultural life. Materiality must be fore-fronted in analyses of cultural difference if they are to tackle the stubborn residue of biological racism within multiculturalism discourse. Multiculturalism studies should analyse the multitude of forces and relations that constitute the present moment of culturally diverse life, but always with the understanding that this analysis might look different from another angle.

      A multiculturalism that is critical and attuned to the complicated cross-overs of private and public discourses must be utilised in order to adequately navigate the conjuncture of cultural difference in the twenty-first century. The following chapter turns its attention to digital storytelling, a genre in which the nation and the ordinary multicultural body overlap.


Скачать книгу