Contemporary Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth. Nadim Z. Baba

Contemporary Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth - Nadim Z. Baba


Скачать книгу
factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:28–35.

      78. Morfis AS. Vertical root fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Radiol Endod 1990;69:631–635.

      79. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Käyser AF. An analysis of durability data on post and core restorations. J Dent 1993;21:281–284.

      80. Colley IT, Hampson EL, Lehman ML. Retention of post crowns: An assessment of the relative efficiency of posts of different shapes and sizes. Br Dent J 1968;124:63–69.

      81. Johnson JK, Sakumura JS. Dowel form and tensile form. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:645–649.

      82. Camp LR, Todd MJ. The effect of dowel preparation on the apical seal of three common obturation techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1983:50:664–666.

      83. Portell FR, Bernier WE, Lorton L, Peters DD. The effect of immediate versus delayed dowel space preparation on the integrity of the apical seal. J Endod 1982;8:154–160.

      84. Kvist T, Rydin E, Reit C. The relative frequency of periapical lesions in teeth with root canal–retained roots. J Endod 1989;15:578–580.

      85. Zmener O. Effect of dowel preparation on the apical seal of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1980;6:687–690.

      86. Neagley RL. The effect of dowel preparation on the apical seal of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1969;28:739–745.

      87. Madison S, Zakariasen KL. Linear and volumetric analysis of apical leakage in teeth prepared for posts. J Endod 1984;10:422–427.

      88. Abou-Rass M, Jann JM, Jobe D, Tsutsui F. Preparation of space for posting: Effect of thickness of canal walls and incidence of perforation in molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1982;104:834–837.

      89. Fuzz Z, Lustiq J, Katz A, Tamse A. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertical root fractured teeth: Impact of operative procedures. J Endod 2001;27:46–48.

      90. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Collard EW, Pollack MH. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1972;33:952–960.

      91. Hunter AJ, Feiglin B, Williams JF. Effects of post placement on endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:166–172.

      92. Trabert KC, Caputo AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture—A comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod 1978;4:341–345.

      93. Leary JM, Aquilino SA, Svare CW. An evaluation of post length within the elastic limits of dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:277–281.

      94. Mattison GD. Photoelastic stress analysis of cast-gold endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:407–411.

      95. Du JK, Lin WK, Wang CH, Lee HE, Li HY, Wu JH. FEM analysis of the mandibular first premolar with different post diameters. Odontology 2011;99:148–154.

      96. Ouzounian ZS, Schilder H. Remaining dentin thickness after endodontic cleaning and shaping before post space preparation. Oral Health 1991;81:13–15.

      97. Raiden G, Costa L, Koss S, Hernández JL, Aceñolaza V. Residual thickness of root in first maxillary premolars with post space preparation. J Endod 1999;25:502–505.

      98. Isom TL, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC. Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring. J Endod 1995;21:368–371.

      99. Kuttler S, McLean A, Dorn S, Fischzang A. The impact of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:903–909.

      100. Shillingburg HT, Kessler JC, Wilson EL. Root dimensions and dowel size. Calif Dent Assoc J 1982;10:43–49.

      101. Tilk MA, Lommel TJ, Gerstein H. A study of mandibular and maxillary root widths to determine dowel size. J Endod 1979;5:79–82.

      102. Cleghorn BM, Goodacre CJ, Christie WH. Morphology of teeth and their root canal systems. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC (eds). Ingle’s Endodontics, ed 6. Hamilton, ON: BC Decker, 2008:151–220. er, 2008:151–220.

      103. Gómez-Polo M, Llidó B, Rivero A, Del Rio J, Celemin A. A 10-year retrospective study of the survival of teeth restored with metal prefabricated posts versus cast metal posts and cores. J Dent 2010;38:916–920.

      104. Pilo R, Shapenco E, Lewinstein I. Residual dentin thickness in bifurcated maxillary first premolars after root canal and post space preparation with parallel-sided drills. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:267–273.

      105. Goodacre CJ. Atlas of the Human Dentition, ed 2. Shelton, CT: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2012.

      106. Joseph I, Varma BR, Bhat KM. Clinical significance of furcation anatomy of the maxillary first premolar: A biometric study on extracted teeth. J Periodontol 1996;67:386–389.

      107. Booker BW, Loughlin DM. A morphologic study of the mesial root surface of the adolescent maxillary first bicuspid. J Periodontol 1985;56:666–670.

      108. Scheid RC, Weiss G. Woelfel’s Dental Anatomy, ed 8. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.

      109. Tamse A, Katz A, Pilo R. Furcation groove of buccal root of maxillary first premolars—A morphologic study. J Endod 2000;26: 359–363.

      110. Gher ME, Vernino AR. Root morphology—Clinical significance in pathogenesis and treatment of periodontal disease. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;101:627–633.

      111. Nelson S, Ash MM Jr. Wheeler’s Dental Anatomy, Physiology, and Occlusion, ed 9. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2010.

       112. Slowey RR. Root canal anatomy. Road map to successful endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1979;23:555–573.

      113. Dental Anatomy & 3-D Interactive Tooth Atlas, v 6.0 [software]. Milpitas, CA: eHuman Digital Anatomy, 2010.

      114. Fuller JL, Denehy GE, Hall SA. Concise Dental Anatomy and Morphology, ed 4. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, 2001.

      115. Jordan R, Abrams L, Kraus B. Kraus’ Dental Anatomy and Occlusion, ed 2. St Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1992.

      116. Pilo R, Tamse A. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with Gates Glidden and ParaPost drills. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:617–623.

      117. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resis tance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:529–536.

      118. Hoag EP, Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:177–181.

      119. Isidor F, Brøndum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:78–82.

      120. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8:155–161.

      121. Zhi-Yue L, Yu-Xing Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:368–373.

      122. Mezzomo E, Massa F, Libera SD. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post-and-core designs cemented with two different cements: An in vitro study. Part I. Quintessence Int 2003;34:301–306.

      123. Tan PL, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, et al. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:331–336.

      124. Purton DG, Love RM. Rigidity and retention of carbon fiber versus stainless steel root canal posts. Int J Endod 1996;29:262–265.

      125. King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:599–609.

      126. Isidor F, Odman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:131–136.

      127. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell


Скачать книгу