The Research Experience. Ann Sloan Devlin
qualities of building exteriors. Nasar, Jack L.; Environment and Behavior, Vol 26(3), May, 1994 Special Issue: Design review: Public participation in the evaluation of design. pp. 371–401. Publisher: Sage Publications; [Journal Article]. Subjects: Aesthetic Preferences; Architecture; Emotional Responses; Evaluation; Urban Planning. Times Cited in this Database: (35).” The hyperlinked option at the bottom of the text is labeled, Check for Full Text.
Back to Figure
The screenshot shows two icons: A magnifying glass over a sheet of paper, and a folder with plus icon. The result shows an academic journal. Text reads, “1. Impressions of psychotherapists’ offices. Nasar, Jack L.; Devlin, Ann Sloan; Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol 58(3), Jul, 2011 pp. 310–320. Publisher: American Psychological Association; [Journal Article]. Subjects: Aesthetic Preferences; Aesthetics; Personalization; Psychotherapists; Therapeutic Environment; Adulthood (18 yrs & older); Male; Female. Cited References: (61) Times Cited in This Database: (6).” The two hyperlinked options are labeled, HTML Full Text and PDF Full Text.
Back to Figure
There are two hyperlinked options: Refine or alter criteria on the top right corner, and Submit a request on the bottom left corner. Text reads, “Search criteria: Fisher, Bonnie (05/01/1955). ‘Fear spots in relation to microlevel physical cues: Exploring the overlooked.’. The journal of research in crime and delinquency (0022-4278), 32 (2), p.214. Citation: Email or Export/Save. Sorry, no holdings were found for this journal. Please see additional options below for finding this journal. Additional options: Interlibrary Loan.”
Back to Figure
In your initial research idea, variable 1 is the satisfaction with athletic participation, which consists of many alternative variables, before reaching variable 2, which is college achievement.
The research gap is closed when the relationship with coach is considered as variable 1, which consists of fewer alternative variables, before reaching variable 2, which is college achievement.
Chapter 3 Research Design Approaches and Issues: An Overview
Chapter highlights
How research quality affects research answers
The continuum of certainty: The distinction between correlation and causation
Characteristics of experimental research
IVs versus DVs
Reframing a study: Correlational, to quasi-experimental, to experimental
Type I versus Type II error
Relationships among sample size, power, and effect size
Threats to internal validity (including Campbell & Stanley’s 1963 list)Demand characteristicsParticipant role attitudesSingle- and double-blind approachesPilot studies, cover stories, and manipulation checks
External validity and ecological validity
Where research takes place: Laboratory research, field study, field experiment, virtual reality, survey research
Overview
This chapter introduces basic concepts and considerations regarding research design and the kinds of research questions that can be answered, depending on your approach. More detailed information about specific designs will come in Chapters 7–10. Fundamental to understanding what research can tell you is the degree of certainty about the results, in particular, the distinction between a study with correlational results and one where causality can be inferred. Moreover, although different research approaches (e.g., experimental and quasi-experimental design) may use the same statistical analyses, what can be claimed about the results is not the same. In designing a research study, there may be many threats to internal validity, that is, whether the design is adequate to answer your research question and evaluate any hypotheses. This chapter will cover those threats to internal validity, talk again about external validity (i.e., generalizability or how broadly the findings can be applied; see Chapter 2), and about two kinds of errors: Type I error (claiming a result was significant when you should not have done so; also called a “false alarm” or a “false positive”) and Type II error (not claiming a result as significant when you should have; also called a “miss” or a “false negative”). Aspects of the study that relate to the roles of both the researcher and the participant will be covered, as well as ways to do preliminary testing of your study (pilot studies and manipulation checks). The chapter will briefly describe the different settings in which research takes place, from the laboratory to the field. By the end of the chapter, you should be well versed in the fundamentals of research that apply across different types of research designs.
At the end of this book, Appendix A (Figure A.1) presents a decision tree to help guide which statistical approach should be used for which kind of research question, and Appendix G presents a table of the statistical analyses in terms of the scale types that are used in common research designs. You may find these appendices helpful to consult throughout the research process.
Research Quality Affects Research Answers
Good research involves asking worthwhile questions that combine tradition and innovation, as illustrated in Chapter 2. Good research also involves selecting an approach that is appropriate for the question(s) you want to answer. Some research questions can be answered with a high degree of certainty; others cannot. In some instances, researchers are interested in what might be called exploratory research; they want to gain a preliminary understanding of a topic and may not formulate specific hypotheses. Often, researchers use interviews, focus groups, and case studies in such research. These approaches are usually described as qualitative and will be discussed more fully in Chapter 8.
Experimental design: Research approach with manipulated variables and random assignment.
Quasi-experimental design: Research approach that resembles experimental research but is based on the use of preexisting groups (quasi-independent variables [IVs]).
Internal validity: Extent to which a research design allows you to test the hypothesis adequately.
Type I error: Incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true.
Whatever your goal and approach, the manner in which you conduct the research affects its quality. As a number of authors have pointed out, simply doing a large and well-funded study does not guarantee that the research questions will be appropriately framed (see R. Kaplan, 1996). Even in exploratory qualitative research where you are trying to get a sense of the issues that matter to people (e.g., reactions to building high-rise, high-density housing near a neighborhood park), many aspects of your approach, such as the facility where the questions are asked and who is included in the interviews, can affect how people respond. This chapter will emphasize quantitative approaches, but many of the same issues dealing with the internal validity of your research (whether the design enables you to answer the research questions) apply to qualitative research as well.
What Research Can Tell You: The Continuum of Certainty
The degree of control you exercise in conducting your research is usually related to the level of certainty you can have in your results—greater control is related to greater certainty. On one end of the research continuum, we do not manipulate any variable; if we want to quantify people’s answers (i.e., quantitative approaches), we typically ask people to answer