Marine Mussels. Elizabeth Gosling
T. & Elliott, M. (2015) Sensitivity of the mussel Mytilus edulis to substrate‐borne vibration in relation to anthropogenically generated noise. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 538, 185–195.
114 Sagert, J. & Waite, H. (2009) Hyperunstable matrix proteins in the byssus of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 212, 2224–2236.
115 Sakamoto, K., Uji, S., Kurokawa, T. & Toyohara, H. (2008) Immunohistochemical, in situ hybridization and biochemical studies on endogenous cellulose of Corbicula japonica. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiolgy Part‐B, 150, 216–221.
116 Seed, R. (1976) Ecology. In: Marine Mussels: Their Ecology and Physiology (ed B.L. Bayne), pp. 13–65. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
117 Seed, R. & Suchanek, T.H. (1992) Population and community ecology of Mytilus. In: The Mussel Mytilus: Ecology, Physiology, Genetics and Culture (ed E.M. Gosling), pp. 87–169. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam.
118 Shirai, K., Takahata, N., Yamamoto, H., Omata, T., Sasaki, T. & Sano Y. (2008) Novel analytical approach to bivalve shell biogeochemistry: a case study of hydrothermal mussel shell. Geochemical Journal, 42, 413–420.
119 Siddall, S.E. (1980) A classification of the genus Perna (Mytilidae). Bulletin of Marine Science, 30, 858–870.
120 Silverman, H.G. & Roberto, F.F. (2007) Understanding marine mussel adhesion. Marine Biotechnology, 9, 661–681.
121 Silverman, H.G. & Roberto, F.F. (2011) Byssus formation in Mytilus. In: Biological Adhesive Systems: From Nature to Technical and Medical Application (eds J. von Byern & I. Grunwald), pp. 273–283. Springer‐Verlag, Vienna.
122 Sorte, C.J.B., Etter, R.J., Spackman, R., Boyle, E.E. & Hannigan, R.E. (2013) Elemental fingerprinting of mussel shells to predict population sources and redistribution potential in the Gulf of Maine. PLoS ONE, 8, e80868.
123 Speiser, D.I. & Johnsen, S. (2008a) Comparative morphology of the concave mirror eyes of scallops (Pectinoidea). American Malacological Bulletin, 26, 27–33.
124 Speiser, D.I. & Johnsen, S. (2008b) Scallops visually respond to the size and speed of virtual particles. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211, 2066–2070.
125 Speiser, D.I. & Wilkens, L.A. (2016) Neurobiology and behavior of the scallop. In: Scallops: Biology, Ecology Aquaculture and Fisheries, 3rd edn. (eds S.E. Shumway & G.J. Parsons), pp. 219–251. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam.
126 Taylor, J.D., Kennedy, W.J. & Hall, A. (1969) The shell structure and mineralogy of the Bivalvia. Introduction, Nuculacea‐Trigonacea. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology), S3, 1–125.
127 Valladares, A., Manríquez, G. & Suárez‐Isla, B.A. (2010) Shell shape variation in populations of Mytilus chilensis (Hupe1854) from southern Chile: a geometric morphometric approach. Marine Biology, 157, 2731–2738.
128 Van der Molen, S., Márquez, F., Idaszkin, Y.A. & Adami, M. (2013) Use of shell‐shape to discriminate between Brachidontes rodriguezii and Brachidontes purpuratus species (Mytilidae) in the transition zone of their distributions (south‐western Atlantic). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 93, 803–808.
129 Waite, J.H. (1992) The formation of mussel byssus: anatomy of a natural manufacturing process. In: Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, Vol. 19 (ed S.T. Case), pp. 27–54. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin.
130 Waite, J.H., Vaccaro, E., Sun, C. & Lucas, J.M. (2002) Elastomeric gradients: a hedge against stress concentration in marine holdfast? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 357, 143–153.
131 Widdows, J. & Donkin, P. (1992) Mussels and environmental contaminants: bioaccummmulation and physiological aspects. In: The Mussel Mytilus: Ecology, Physiology, Genetics and Culture (ed E.M. Gosling), pp. 383–424. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam.
132 Wiegemann, M. (2005) Adhesion in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and barnacles (genus Balanus): mechanisms and technical applications. Aquatic Sciences, 67, 166–176.
133 Wilcox, R. (2013) Review on the incidence of pearling in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis: with relevance to the mussel beds of the Walney Channel, Barrow‐in‐Furness, Cumbria, England. Cumbria Wildlife Trust, Kendal.
134 Yarra, T., Gharbi, K., Blaxter, M., Peck, L.S. & Clark, M.S. (2016) Characterization of the mantle transcriptome in bivalves: Pecten maximus, Mytilus edulis and Crassostrea gigas. Marine Genomics, 27, 9–15.
135 Zardi, G.I., McQuaid, C.D. & Nicastro, K.R. (2007) Balancing survival and reproduction: seasonality of wave action, attachment strength and reproductive output in indigenous Perna perna and invasive Mytilus galloprovincialis mussels. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 334, 155–163.
136 Zhadan, P.M. (2005) Directional sensitivity of the Japanese scallop Mizuhopecten yessoensis and Swift scallop Chlamys swifti to water‐borne vibrations. Russian Journal of Marine Biology, 31, 28–35.
137 Zhadan, P.M., Sizov, A.V. & Dautov, S.S. (2004) Ultrastructure of the abdominal sense organ of the scallop Mizuhopecten yessoensis (Jay). Cell Tissue Research, 318, 617–629.
138 Zhu, Q. & Pan, Q. (2014) Mussel‐inspired direct immobilization of nanoparticles and application for oil‐water separation. ACS Nano, 8, 1402–1409.
3 Ecology of Marine Mussels
Introduction
Ecology is the study of how organisms interact with one another and with their physical environment. The distribution and abundance of organisms on Earth is shaped by both biotic (living organism‐related) and abiotic (physical) factors. Ecology is studied at many levels, including at the level of the organism, population, ecosystem and biosphere. At the organismal level, ecologists study adaptations, beneficial features arising by natural selection, that allow organisms to live in specific habitats. These adaptations can be morphological, physiological or behavioural. At the population level, the size, density and structure of populations and how they change over time are studied. An ecosystem consists of all the organisms in an area, the community and the abiotic factors that influence that community. Ecosystem ecologists often focus on flow of energy and recycling of nutrients (reviewed in Dame 2012; Riisgård 2017). Finally, the biosphere is the planet Earth, viewed as an ecological system. Ecologists working at this level study global patterns, species distribution, interactions among ecosystems and phenomena that affect the entire globe, such as climate change (OpenStax College 2013).
The environment embodies everything outside the organism that impinges on it, including physical factors (e.g. temperature, salinity and light) and biological factors (e.g. predators, competitors and parasites). An organism’s response to these factors influences its distribution and abundance on both a local and a regional scale. In this chapter, the effects of temperature and salinity – probably the two most important physical factors governing the distribution of marine organisms – will be described. Their effects on other aspects of mussel biology, such as feeding, reproduction, growth and respiration, and osmotic regulation, are covered in Chapters 4, 5, 6 and 7, respectively. Other limiting factors, such as aerial exposure, oxygen concentration, currents and substrate type, will be briefly reviewed in this chapter. In addition, effects of biological factors such as predation and competition will be considered. Pathogens and parasites (see Chapter 11) also influence the ecology of bivalve populations. Finally, the potential and observed impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems will be discussed.
Before describing the major factors that influence mussel distribution patterns, information on global and local ranges of representative marine mussel species is presented in the following section.