Pathy's Principles and Practice of Geriatric Medicine. Группа авторов

Pathy's Principles and Practice of Geriatric Medicine - Группа авторов


Скачать книгу
the frequency of faecal incontinence,43 although the dietary and lifestyle changes required to be eligible for bariatric surgery may also be relevant factors. Endocrine disorders leading to changes in bowel habit, such as constipation associated with hypothyroidism, may lead to impaction and subsequent faecal incontinence. Likewise, poorly controlled diabetes is associated with faecal incontinence, likely due to autonomic and peripheral neuropathy.44

      Geriatric syndromes

      As with urinary incontinence, the ability to defecate at a time and place of one’s own choosing relies on both physical and cognitive function. Locating suitable facilities requires integrating visual information to identify and visuospatial and executive function to plot a route to those facilities. The person will then need to rise, ambulate, disrobe, and sit before defecation can occur. A disorder that impairs these processes and their integration, including visual impairment or unfamiliar or poorly signposted toilets, such as those found in hospitals and care homes, will make it more challenging to locate facilities; and impairments to mobility, through sarcopenia, arthritis, or neurological conditions, including stroke, will make both reaching the toilet and getting into position to defecate more challenging and potentially lead to faecal incontinence. Unsurprisingly, faecal incontinence is more prevalent among nursing home residents than any other group.4 Walking aids such as frames can also impair the ability to access facilities, and adaptive devices such as raised toilet seats cause the rectum to straighten, making defecation more difficult.

      Medications and drugs

      Sequelae of faecal incontinence

Medications implicated in diarrhoea or loose stool
Metformin
Magnesium‐containing antacids
Proton pump inhibitors
Aminosalicylates
Digoxin
Methyldopa
Antibiotics
Acarbose
Colchicine
Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs
Sorbitol (found in sugar‐free preparations and confectionary)
Laxatives
Medications inducing constipation
Opioids
Drugs with anticholinergic effects
Tricyclic antidepressants
OAB medications
Calcium channel blockers
Loperamide
Iron preparations
Drugs increasing GI motility
Metoclopramide
Macrolide antibiotics
Domperidone
Drugs that alter anal sphincter tone
Nitrates Beta blockers PDE‐5 inhibitors

      Faecal incontinence is associated with significant personal and healthcare resource use, although accurate data are sparse.6 Costs include both direct costs, such as containment products, care staff time, and laundry of clothes and bedsheets, and indirect costs, including work absenteeism of both the sufferer and their care partners, as well as dealing with complications of faecal incontinence such as UTIs. The total cost of faecal incontinence in the US is estimated to exceed $16 billion annually, and this is likely an underestimate.

      Given that people with faecal incontinence often will not volunteer that information, active case finding is essential in at‐risk groups, including those with frailty, neurological disease, or urinary incontinence and those taking potentially causative drugs such as opioids or metformin.

      The goals of evaluating faecal incontinence in older adults should be to establish the frequency and severity of incontinence and the impact on the individual’s quality of life. Appropriate goal‐setting with the patient and their caregiver is essential, as well as exploring the extent to which treatment options are acceptable.

      The mainstay of the assessment of faecal incontinence is the clinical history. This should include the duration of symptoms, frequency and consistence of normal, controlled bowel movements, frequency and consistency of faecal incontinence, and consistency to flatus. Objective assessment of stool consistency with the Bristol stool scale49 allows accurate and consistent description of stool types. An assessment of potentially contributing medical conditions as above, as well as a comprehensive drug history, including over‐the‐counter and dietary supplements, should also be taken. A functional history should be taken, covering the patient’s ability to identify and get to facilities and undress, get dressed, and wash their hands, as well as a description of the facilities available in the patient’s home, including access, grab rails, and the necessity to climb stairs. As with the assessment of urinary incontinence, asking the patient to go to the bathroom in the clinic and observing the process can be illuminating. A dietary history covering the intake of soluble and insoluble fibre, fruits, and vegetables is also important, and involving a dietician can be helpful.


Скачать книгу