A Companion to Medical Anthropology. Группа авторов
research (Ruth et al. 2019)
advancing popular but still largely untested theories (e.g., syndemics) with innovative methods (Brewis et al. 2020; Mendenhall and Singer 2020; Tomori et al. 2018)
This list, though incomplete, hints at how central methodological developments are to medical anthropology’s theoretical and practical significance. No single method defines us, and no method is exclusively ours. But the unifying commitment to ethnography as strategy – encompassing many techniques (Bernard 2018, p. 2) – is distinctive of the field. It’s what drives our relevance to the communities and collaborators with whom we work.
Our continued relevance will also depend on how we respond to this pivotal historical moment. Intersecting crises of COVID-19 and police violence against Black people in the United States forced many people to re-examine aspects of work and daily life that they previously took for granted. In addition, the abrupt halt to field research amid pandemic lockdowns led many anthropologists to seek ways of doing “anthropology from home” (Góralska 2020), to experiment with digital methods (Arya and Henn 2021; Podjed 2021), to intensify scrutiny of “the field” (Chambers 2020; Gross 2020), and to rethink relations between (sub)disciplines (Briggs 2020). Meanwhile, the momentary global awakening to violent anti-Blackness underscored the urgency of calls for an anthropology of white supremacy (Beliso-De Jesús and Pierre 2020), with attendant questions about epistemology, method, and the construction of the canon (Blakey 2020; Smalls et al. 2021; Smith and Garrett-Scott 2021; Tuhiwai Smith 2021; Zuberi and Bonilla-Silva 2008).
It is not yet clear how these developments will play out; the next several years will be telling. We would do well to recognize how central research methods and research design are to the pressing questions ahead.
REFERENCES CITED
1 Arya, D. and Henn, M. (2021). COVID-Ized ethnography: Challenges and opportunities for young environmental activists and researchers. Societies 11 (2): 58.
2 Baer, R.D., Weller, S.C., De Alba Garcia, J.G., Glazer, M., Trotter, R., Pachter, L., and Klein, R.E. (2003). A cross-cultural approach to the study of the folk illness nervios. Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry 27 (3): 315–337.
3 Barrett, R. (2008). Aghor Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4 Beliso-De Jesús, A.M. and Pierre, J. (2020). Introduction to special section: Anthropology of white supremacy. American Anthropologist 122 (1): 65–75.
5 Bernard, H.R. (1996). Qualitative data, quantitative analysis. Cultural Anthropology Methods Journal 8 (1): 9–11.
6 Bernard, H.R. (2018). Research Methods in Anthropology, 6e. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7 Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., and Sailer, L. (1984). The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 495–517.
8 Bernard, H.R., Wutich, A., and Ryan, G.W. (2017). Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches, 2e. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9 Blakey, M.L. (2020). Archaeology under the blinding light of race. Current Anthropology 61 (S22): S183–97.
10 Bonilla, Y. and Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist 42 (1): 4–17.
11 Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., and Johnson, J.C. (2018). Analyzing Social Networks. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
12 Borgerhoff Mulder, M. and Caro, T.M. (1985). The use of quantitative observational techniques in anthropology. Current Anthropology 26 (3): 323–335.
13 Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 13 (2): 201–216.
14 Brewis, A., Wutich, A., Galvin, M., and Lachaud, J. (May 2020). Localizing syndemics: A comparative study of hunger, stigma, suffering, and crime exposure in three haitian communities. Social Science & Medicine 113031.
15 Brewis, A., Piperata, B., Dengah, H.J.F., Dressler, W.W., II, Liebert, M., Mattison, S., Negrón, R., Nelson, R., Oths, K., Snodgrass, J., Tanner, S., Thayer, Z., Wander, K., and Gravlee, C.C. (2022). Biocultural strategies for stress measurement in field-based research. Field Methods 33 (4): 315–334.
16 Brim, J.A. and Spain, D.H. (1974). Research Design in Anthropology: Paradigms and Pragmatics in the Testing of Hypotheses. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
17 Briggs, Charles L. (2020). Beyond the Linguistic/Medical Anthropology Divide: Retooling Anthropology to Face COVID-19. Medical Anthropology 39 (7): 563–72.
18 Brondizio, E.S. and Van Holt, T. (2015). Geospatial Analysis. In: Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, 2e (ed. H.R. Bernard and C.C. Gravlee), 601–630. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
19 Carey, J.W. and Gelaude, D. (2008). Systematic methods for collecting and analyzing multidisciplinary team-based qualitative data. In: Handbook for Team-Based Qualitative Research. New York: AltaMira Press.
20 Cascio, M.A. (2017). Operationalizing new biopolitical theory for anthropological inquiry. Anthropological Quarterly 90 (1): 193–224.
21 Chambers, T. (2020). From fieldsite to “fieldsite”: Ethnographic methods in the time of COVID. Studies in Indian Politics 8 (2): 290–293.
22 Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis, 2e. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23 Chavez, L.R., Hubbell, F.A., McMullin, J.M., Martinez, R.G., and Mishra, S.I. (1995). Structure and meaning in models of breast and cervical cancer risk factors: A comparison of perceptions among latinas, anglo women, and physicians. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 9 (1): 40–47.
24 Chavez, L.R., McMullin, J.M., Mishra, S.I., and Hubbell, F.A. (2001). Beliefs matter: Cultural beliefs and the use of cervical cancer-screening tests. American Anthropologist 103 (4): 1114–1129.
25 Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1): 155–159.
26 Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, 2e. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
27 Dengah, H.J.F., Snodgrass, J.G., Polzer, E.R., and Nixon, W.C. (2021). Systematic Methods for Analyzing Culture: A Practical Guide. New York: Routledge.
28 DeWalt, K.M. and DeWalt, B.R. (2011). Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers, 2e. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29 Doerfel, M.L. (1998). What constitutes semantic network analysis? A comparison of research and methdologies. Connections 21 (2): 16–26.
30 Dressler, W.W. (1995). Modeling biocultural interactions: examples from studies of stress and cardiovascular disease. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 38: 27–56.
31 Dressler, W.W. (2005). What’s cultural about biocultural research? Ethos 33 (1): 20–45.
32 Dressler, W.W. (2016). The 5 Things You Need to Know about Statistics: Quantification in Ethnographic Research. New York: Routledge.
33 Dressler, W.W. (2018). Culture and the Individual: Theory and Method of Cultural Consonance. New York: Routledge.
34 Dressler, W.W. (2020). Cultural consensus and cultural consonance: advancing a cognitive theory of culture. Field Methods 32 (4): 383–398.
35 Dressler, W.W., Borges, C.D., Balieiro, M.C., and Dos Santos, J.E. (2005). Measuring cultural consonance: examples with special reference to measurement theory in anthropology. Field Methods 17 (4): 331–355.
36 Dressler, W.W., Balieiro, M.C., and Dos Santos, J.E. (2015). Finding culture change in the second factor stability and change in cultural consensus and residual agreement. Field Methods 27 (1): 22–38.
37 El Guindi, F. (2004). Visual Anthropology: Essential Method and Theory. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
38 Farnell,