Advanced Analytics and Deep Learning Models. Группа авторов
Result of MCRS Item–Based CF
Top 10 Main Aspects Extracted
Configuration | Dataset | Yelp | Place, food, service, restaurant, price menu, staff, drink, and lunch | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#asp. | Sub-asp | Yelp | TripAdvisor | Amazon | |||
10 | Y | 0.864 | 0.8245 | 0.811 | TripAdvisor | Hotel, room, staff, location, service, breakfast, restaurant, bathroom, price, view | |
10 | N | 0.8643 | 0.8252 | 0.8117 | |||
50 | Y | 0.8641 | 0.8254 | 0.8118 | Amazon | game, graphic, story, character, player price, gameplay, controller level, and music | |
50 | N | 0.8648 | 0.826 | 0.8124 |
It is noted that, to get better efficiency, we need to configure all the datasets in top 10 neighbors.
In the next step, they compared the algorithm with matrix factorization (MF) algorithms for getting better baselines. Besides, it is specified that TripAdvisor dataset has an unchangeable set of six features. For every analysis like “Cleanliness”, “location”, “value”, “service”, “sleep quality”, and “overall”. They have differentiated their way with a MCRS algorithm that depends on those aspects. In Table 3.5, we can see that their method gets the better of against all the baselines. These results surely established that their