The True History of the State Prisoner, commonly called the Iron Mask. Dover George Agar Ellis
94, 95, 97.
87
Ibid. No. 97.
88
89
Appendix, No. 90.
90
Ibid. No. 93.
91
Ibid. No. 96.
92
Ibid. No. 101.
93
Charles IV. or V., for he is sometimes called one and sometimes the other, was the son of Nicholas Francis, Cardinal, and afterwards Duke of Lorrain. On the death of his uncle, Charles IV., he took the barren titles of Duke of Lorrain and Bar, but never obtained possession of his territories, (which were usurped by France,) “though his military, political, and Christian virtues and talents, made him worthy to occupy the first throne in the universe.” He commanded the armies of the Emperor for some years with the greatest distinction, married the Archduchess Eleanor, widow of Michael Wiecnowiecki, King of Poland, and died in 1690. Lewis the Fourteenth, on hearing of his death, said of him, “that he was the greatest, wisest, and most generous of his enemies.”
94
Appendix, No. 102.
95
Appendix, No. 107.
96
Appendix, No. 106.
97
Appendix, No. 108.
98
Appendix, No. 103.
99
Appendix, No. 104.
100
Ibid.
101
Appendix, No. 105.
102
If we were to judge of the Christian religion by the manner in which it was professed by Lewis the Fourteenth, we should indeed have a most perverted idea of its precepts. It seems as if the pseudo-christianity of that monarch, only incited him to acts of narrow-minded bigotry and cruelty, allowing, at the same time, full latitude to every kind of licentious excess; while it debarred him from the exercise of humanity and toleration. A good measure of the nature and extent of his religious knowledge and feelings is acquired, by the anecdote respecting Fontpertuis and the Duke of Orleans. When the latter was going into Spain, Lewis objected to his taking the former with him, because he was a Jansenist; but withdrew the objection when assured by the duke that he was only an atheist!
103
M. Roux (Fazillac), quoting from an unpublished letter of Louvois to St. Mars, dated December 14th, 1681.
104
About 1
105
Exiles was taken from the French in 1708, by the Duke of Savoy, but restored to them by the treaty of Utrecht.
106
Appendix, No. 111.
107
Appendix, No. 111.
108
Appendix, No. 112.
109
Appendix, No. 111.
110
Appendix, No. 112.
111
Ibid.
112
Appendix, No. 115.
113
Appendix, No. 111.
114
Appendix, No. 117.
115
Appendix, No. 113.
116
117
Appendix, No. 120.
118
Appendix, No. 121.
119
Appendix, No. 121.
120
Appendix, No. 123.
121
Roux (Fazillac).
122
Ibid.
123
Ibid.
124
125
Appendix, No. 124.
126
Appendix, No. 125.
127
Appendix, No. 124.
128
Appendix, No. 126.
129
Delort.
130
Extract of Dujonca’s journal, in Mr. Craufurd’s article upon “L’Homme au Masque de fer.”
131
Delort.
132
Papon in his “Histoire générale de Provence” informs us that he went to see the room.
133
“Histoire générale de Provence, du Père Papon.”
134
See “Mélanges d’Histoire et de Littérature,” by Mr. Quintin Craufurd.
135
See the same work of Mr. Quintin Craufurd.
136
This must have been Lewis Francis Le Tellier, Marquis de Barbezieux, who, in the preceding year, had succeeded his father, Louvois, in the post of Secretary of State for the War Department. He was an indolent but intelligent Minister. – Died in 1701, aged 33.
137
Appendix, No. 127.
138
Delort.
139
Delort, quoting from an unpublished letter (probably from Barbezieux), dated August 4th, 1698. – It may be as well to mention here that M. Delort frequently quotes portions of letters from the French Archives, but does not publish them in his appendix. When in the course of this narrative the name of M. Delort is given as an authority, it is, for the most part, under these circumstances.
140
Such is the account given by M. de Palteau, the direct descendant of St. Mars, in a letter to Freron, dated Palteau, June 19th, 1768. It was published in the “Année Littéraire” for that year, and has since been republished by Mr. Craufurd, in his paper on the Iron Mask.
141
Delort.
142
The place of “Lieutenant de Roi,” at the Bastille, was created by Lewis the Fourteenth, for M. Dujonca, who had been “Exempt” of one of the regiments of the King’s Body-guards. He acquired great credit by his endeavours to procure the release of the prisoners under his care, whom, upon inquiry, he found to be unjustly detained. Some one represented to him that he would deprive himself of a great portion of his profits by thus diminishing the number of prisoners – to which he replied, “