The Life of John Marshall, Volume 3: Conflict and construction, 1800-1815. Beveridge Albert Jeremiah
id="n280">
280
281
Tucker:
282
283
Plumer to Upham, March 1, 1802, Plumer MSS. Lib. Cong.
284
March 12, 1802.
285
March 23, 1802.
286
March 15, 1802.
287
Vans Murray to King, April 5, 1802, King, iv, 95.
288
Sedgwick to King, Feb. 20, 1802,
289
Ames to Dwight, April 16, 1802, Ames, i, 297.
290
291
292
293
They never occupied the bench under the Federalist Act of 1801. They were appointed, but the swift action of Jefferson and the Republicans prevented them from entering upon the discharge of their duties.
294
This case was before the Supreme Court in December, 1801, and, ordinarily, would have been decided at the next term, June, 1802.
295
296
297
298
299
300
See vol. ii, 62, of this work.
301
Ames to Gore, Dec. 13, 1802, Ames, i, 310.
302
303
Pickering to Peters, Dec. 24, 1803,
304
Cabot to King, March 27, 1802, King, iv, 94.
305
306
"Bowling" in the
307
Marshall to his wife, Jan. 2, 1803, MS.
308
See vol. ii, 502-05, of this work.
309
Marshall to King, May 5, 1802, King, iv, 116-18.
310
Since the adoption of the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions in 1798. (See vol. ii, chaps. x, xi, xii, of this work.)
311
Since the Republican repeal of the Federalist Judiciary Act was proposed. See
312
Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island.
313
The Federalist majority in Vermont resolved that: "It belongs not to
The Federalist majority in the Maryland Legislature asserted that "no state government … is competent to declare an act of the federal government unconstitutional, … that jurisdiction … is exclusively vested in the courts of the United States." (Anderson, in
The New York Federalists were slow to act, but finally resolved "that the right of deciding on the constitutionality of all laws passed by Congress … appertains to the judiciary department." (
Connecticut Federalists declared that the Kentucky and Virginia plan was "hostile to the existence of our national Union." (
In Delaware the then dominant party decided that the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions were "not a fit subject" for their consideration. (
The Pennsylvania Federalist majority resolved that the people "have committed to the supreme judiciary of the nation the high authority of ultimately and conclusively deciding the constitutionality of all legislative acts." (Anderson, in
On February 8, 1799, Massachusetts replied to the Virginia Resolutions that: "This legislature are persuaded that the decision of all cases in law or equity, arising under the Constitution of the United States, and the construction of all laws made in pursuance thereof, are exclusively vested by the people in the Judicial Courts of the U. States." (
Such was the general tenor of the Federalists' pronouncements upon this grave problem. But because the people believed the Sedition Law to be directed against free speech, the Federalist supremacy in many of the States that insisted upon these sound Nationalist principles was soon overthrown.
The resolutions of the Republican minorities in the Legislatures of the Federalist States were emphatic assertions that any State might declare an act of Congress unconstitutional and disregard it, and
314
See vol. ii, 387-89, of this work.
315
Referring to Marshall's conduct in the French Mission. (See vol. ii, chaps. vii, viii, ix, of this work.)
316
Anderson, in
317
318
The questions raised by the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions were principal themes of debate in State Legislatures, in the press, in Congressional campaigns, and in the Presidential contest of 1800. The Judiciary debate of 1802 was, in part, a continuance of these popular discussions.
319
See
320
Within a year after Marbury
321
See vol. i, 410, of this work.
322
March 2, 1801.
323
324
325
326