Woman, Church & State. Gage Matilda Joslyn

Woman, Church & State - Gage Matilda Joslyn


Скачать книгу
the same religious teaching, the change of country and language but more fully serves to depict the condition of woman everywhere in christendom at this period.

BRETON BALLAD OF THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY. THE BARON OF JAUIOZI

      As I was at the river washing,

      I heard the sighing of the bird of death.

      “Good little Jina, you do not know it, but

      you are sold to the Baron of Jauioz.”

      Is this true, my mother, that I have heard?

      Is it true that I was sold to old Jauioz?

      “My poor little darling, I know nothing about it;

      ask your father.”

      “My nice good father, tell me now – is it true

      that I am sold to Loys de Jauioz?”

      “My beloved child, I know nothing about it;

      ask your brother.”

      Lannik, my brother, tell me now – is it true

      that I am sold to that lord there?

      “Yes you are sold to the Baron, and you must be

      off at once. Your price is paid – fifty crowns of the

      white silver and as much of the yellow gold.”

II

      She had not gone far from the hamlet

      when she heard the ringing of the bells; whereat

      she wept.

      “Adieu Saint Ann! Adieu, bells of my fatherland;

      Bells of my village church, adieu!”

III

      “Take a seat and rest thee till the repast is ready.”

      The lord sat near the fire; his beard and hair all

      white, and his eyes like living coals.

      “Behold the young maiden whom I have desired

      this many a day!”

      “Come my child, let me show thee, crown by crown,

      how rich I am; come, count with me, my beauty,

      my gold and my silver.”

      “I should like better to be with my mother

      counting the chips on the fire.”

      “Let us descend into the cellar and

      taste of the wine that is sweet as honey.”

      “I should like better to taste the meadow stream

      Whereof my father’s horses drink.”

      “Come with me from shop to shop to buy thee a

      holiday cloak.”

      “I should better like a linsey petticoat,

      that my mother has woven for me.”

      “Ah, that my tongue had been blistered when

      I was such a fool as to buy thee!

      Since nothing will comfort thee.”

IV

      “Dear little birds as you fly, I pray you

      listen to me,

      You are going to the village whither I cannot.

      You are merry but I am sad.”

      “Remember me to my playmates,

      To the good mother who brought me to light,

      And to the father who reared me; and tell my

      brother

      I forgive him.”

V

      Two or three months have passed and gone

      when as the family are sleeping,

      A sweet voice is heard at the door.

      “My father, my mother, for God’s love pray for me;

      your daughter lies on her bier.”

      This ballad founded upon historic facts represents the social life of christendom during the fourteenth century. The authority of the son, the licentiousness of the lord, the powerlessness of the mother, the despair of the daughter, the indifference of society, are vividly depicted in this pathetic ballad. It shows the young girl regarded as a piece of merchandise, to be bought and sold at the whim of her masters who are the men of her own household and the lord of the manor. During the feudal period the power of the son was nearly absolute. For his own aggrandisement he did not hesitate to rob his sisters, or sell them into lechery.259 Hopelessly despairing in tone, this ballad gives us a clear picture of feudal times when chivalry was at its height, and the church had reached its ultimate of power. Woman’s attitude today is the echo of that despair. At this period the condition of a woman was not even tolerable unless she was an heiress, with fiefs in possession.260 Even then she was deprived of her property in case of loss of chastity, of which it was the constant aim to deprive her. Guardians, next of kin, and if none such existed, the church threw constant temptations in her way. Ruffians were hired, or reckless profligates induced to betray her under plea of love and sympathy, well paid by the next heir for their treachery.

      Although Sir William Blackstone in his Commentaries said that he discovered no traces of marquette in England, a reminiscence of that custom is to be found in the “fine” or “permit” known in that country as Redemption of Blood, and designated as Merchetum Sanguinis, by Fleta.261 This was a customary payment made by a tenant to his lord for license to give his daughter in marriage. Such redemption was considered a special mark of tenure in villeinage.262 It was not exacted from a free man, which is corroborative proof of its origin in the Jus Primae Noctis, of the feudal lord. Of the free man this fine was not permissible, because of the privilege of free blood. Raepsaet, M. Hoffman, Dr. Karl Schmidt, and other authors writing in the interest of the church and finding it impossible to deny the existence of some power over the bride, have questioned its character, declaring it not to be feudal, but a spiritual authority, to guard the bride by enforcing a penitence of marital abstinence of one to three days after the nuptials. It is not to be doubted that under the peculiar teachings of the church in regard to the uncleanliness of marriage, such continence was a certain period part of church law.263 Nevertheless this does not invalidate the fact that a widespread contrary custom existed in feudal times and at a still later period. The present usages of society point back to an age when right to the peasant’s bride was enforced by the lord. A reminiscence264 of this period is to be found in charivari and the buying off of a party of this character with refreshments from the house, or with money for the purchase of cigars and liquor. Such occurrences constantly fall within our knowledge, personally or through the press.265 The very fact of such persecution of the bridal pair is a symbol of that custom under which the retainers of the feudal lord jeered and flouted the bridegroom, throwing him into foul water,266 and other most unseemly practices. To others outside of the charivari party this practice still affords amusement, few persons inclining to interfere or prohibit such pastimes. Society no longer as sharply defined as in the feudal period, yet has preserved in this practice a symbol of the times when even the highborn dames in the castle equally as degraded as its lord, amused themselves while the bride was in the company of the lord by ridiculing and torturing the husband who in anxiety for his wife ventured too near the castle. The present nearly universal custom of a wedding journey must be referred in its origin to the same period, arising from an inherited tendency in the bride and groom to escape the jeers and ill treatment that in past ages invariably accompanied entrance into the married state.

      In some


Скачать книгу

<p>259</p>

There are those who to enrich themselves would not only rob their sisters of their portion, but would sell for money the honor of those who bear their name. The authority of the son during the feudal period was so absolute that the father and mother themselves often winked at this hideous traffic. —Ibid, p. 46.

<p>260</p>

Unless an heiress, woman possessed no social importance; unless an inmate of a religious house no religious position. There are some records of her in this last position, showing what constant effort and strength of intellect were demanded from her to thwart the machinations of abbots and monks. —Sketches of Fontervault.

<p>261</p>

See page 193. —Fleta.

<p>262</p>

Bracton, 26, 195, 208. Littleton’s Tenures, 55, 174, 209.

<p>263</p>

Gratain, Canon for Spain in 633, says the nuptial robe was garnished with white and purple ribbons as a sign of the continence to which young married people devoted themselves for a time.

<p>264</p>

Eight young men, living in the vicinity of North Rose, Wayne County, have been held to await the action of the grand jury for rioting. A young married couple named Garlic were about to retire for the night when they were startled by the appearance of a party of men in the yard. The party immediately commenced beating on pans, discharging guns and pistols, pounding with clubs, screaming and kicking at the doors of the house. The bride and groom were terrified, but finally the groom mustered enough courage to demand what the men wanted there. Shouts of “Give us lots of cider or we’ll horn you to death,” were the answers. An attempt was made to break in a rear door of the house. The bride and groom and John Wager, who was also present in the house, braced the doors from the inside to prevent a forcible entrance, and the inmates had to defend the property nearly all night. The horning party, at last weary of calling for cider, left the premises giving an extra strong fusillade of firearms and a series of yells as they departed. The eight young men were arrested a few days later on suspicion of being in the horning party. —Press Report, Jan. 14, 1887.

<p>265</p>

Whenever we discover symbolized forms, we are justified in inferring that in the past life of the people employing them there were corresponding realities. McLennon. —Studies in Ancient History, p. 6.

<p>266</p>

He was thrown into the moat to cool his ardor, pelted with stones, derided as a proud and envious wretch. —Michelet.