1
E. J. Castle, Shakespeare, Bacon, Jonson, and Greene, pp. 194–195.
2
The Shakespeare Problem Restated, p. 145.
3
The Shakespeare Problem Restated, p. 340.
4
The Shakespeare Problem Restated, pp. 340, 341.
5
In Re Shakespeare, p. 54.
6
The Shakespeare Problem Restated, p. 341.
7
Ibid., p. 470.
8
The Shakespeare Problem Restated, p. 339.
9
The Vindicators of Shakespeare, pp. 115–116.
10
Ibid., p. 49.
11
The Vindicators of Shakespeare, p. 14.
12
Francis Bacon Wrote Shakespeare. By H. Crouch-Batchelor, 1912.
13
The Shakespere Problem Restated, p. 293.
14
The Shakespeare Problem Restated, pp. 31–37.
15
The Shakespeare Problem Restated, pp. 36–37.
16
Tue Shakespeare Problem Restated, p. 20.
17
The Shakespeare Problem Restated, pp. 47–48.
18
Ibid., pp. 54–55.
19
Ibid. 1 E. J. Castle, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 See his 25 26 27 28 In a brief note of two pages ( He says that I had represented him as stating that the Unknown genius adopted the name of William Shake-speare or Shakespeare “as a good Mr. Greenwood next writes that the confusion between the actor, and the unknown taking the name William Shakespeare, “did happen and was intended to happen.” How could it happen if the actor were the bookless, ignorant man whom Mr. Greenwood describes? It could not happen: Will must have been unmasked in a day. The fact that a strange plot existed was only too obvious. The Unknown’s secret must have been tracked by the hounds of keenest nose in the packs of rival and jealous authors and of actors. None gives tongue. 29 30 31 In the passage which I quoted, with notes of omission, from Mr. Greenwood (p. 333), he went on to say that the eulogies of the poet by “some cultured critics of that day,” “afford no proof that the author who published under the name of Shakespeare was in reality Shakspere the Stratford player.” That position I later contest. 32 See chap. XI, 33 34 Furness, 35 On this see Mr. Pollard’s 36 37 38