Социологический ежегодник 2015-2016. Коллектив авторов
в распоряжении О’Коннор и Йоффе, позволяют сделать вывод о том, что «заявления адептов нейронауки о радикальной трансформации под ее воздействием обыденных представлений о феномене Я, о других и об окружающем мире являются явным преувеличением» [O’Connor, Joffe, 2013, p. 262]. Объяснением социально-психологической устойчивости суждений и установок здравого смысла, касающихся свободы воли, индивидуальной ответственности, нравственных ценностей и психической нормы, служит их глубокая укорененность в культурных нарративах и символах западного общества, при участии которых происходит постепенная социально-психологическая инкорпорация нейробиологического знания в контекст наличных социальных представлений на фоне единичного изменения привычных смыслов.
«A disease like any other?» A decade of change in public reactions to schizophrenia, depression and alcohol dependence / Pescosolido B.A., Martin J.K., Long J.S., Medina T.R., Phelan J.S., Link B.G. // The American j. of psychiatry. – Wash., 2010. – Vol. 167, N 11. – P. 1321–1330.
Abend G. Thick concepts and the moral brain // European j. of sociology. – Cambridge, 2011. – Vol. 52, N 1. – P. 143–172.
Abend G. What the science of morality doesn’t say about morality // Philosophy of social sciences. – L., 2012. – Vol. 43, N 2. – P. 157–200.
Appiah A. Experiments in ethics. – Cambridge (MA): Harvard univ. press, 2008. – 274 p.
Axelrod R. The evolution of cooperation. – N.Y.: Basic books, 1984. – X, 241 p.
Bargh J.A., Chartrand T.L. The unbearable automaticity of being // American psychologist. – Wash., 1999. – Vol. 54, N 7. – P. 462–479.
Changeux J.P., Ricoeur P. What makes us think? A neuroscientist and a philosopher argue about ethics, human nature and the brain. – Princeton (NJ): Princeton univ. press, 2000. – X, 335 p.
Churchland P.M. Toward a cognitive neurobiology of the moral virtues // Topoi: An international rev. of philosophy. – Dordrecht, 1998. – Vol. 17, N 2. – P. 83–96.
Contemporary neuroscience in media / Racine E., Waldman S., Rosenberg J., Illes J. // Social science a. medicine. – Oxford, 2010. – Vol. 71, N 4. – P. 725–733.
Damasio A. Decartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. – N.Y.: Putnam, 1994. – XIX, 312 p.
De Brigard F., Mandelbaum E., Ripley D. Responsibility and the brain sciences // Ethical theory a. moral practice. – Dordrecht, 2009. – Vol. 12, N 5. – P. 511–524.
De Waal F. Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. – Cambridge (MA): Harvard univ. press, 1996. – VIII, 296 p.
Farrah M.L. Neuroethics: The ethical, legal and societal impact of neuroscience // Annual rev. of psychology. – Palo Alto (CA), 2012. – Vol. 63. – P. 571–591.
Fehr E., Fischbacher U. The nature of human altruism // Nature. – L., 2003. – Vol. 425, N 6960. – P. 785–791.
Foot Ph. Natural goodness. – Oxford: Clarendon, 2001. – 125 p.
Foot Ph. Virtues and vices, and other issues in moral philosophy. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2002. – 232 p.
Gazzaniga M.S. The ethical brain. – N.Y.: Dana press, 2005. – XIX, 201 p.
Green J. From neural «is» to moral «ought»: What are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? // Nature rev.: Neuroscience. – L., 2003. – Vol. 4, N 10. – P. 847–850.
Haidt J. Moral psychology for the twenty-first century // J. of moral education. – L., 2013. – Vol. 42, N 3. – P. 281–297.
Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgement // Psychological rev. – Wash., 2001. – Vol. 108, N 4. – P. 814–834.
Haidt J. The new synthesis in moral psychology // Science. – N.Y., 2007. – Vol. 316, N 5827. – P. 998–1002.
Haidt J. The righteous man: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. – N.Y.: Pantheon, 2012. – 392 p.
Haidt J., Joseph C. Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues // Daedalus. – Cambridge (MA), 2004. – Vol. 133, N 4. – P. 55–66.
Herculano-Houzel S. Do you know your brain? A survey on public neuroscience literacy at the closing of the decade of the brain // The neuroscientist. – Thousand Oakes (CA), 2002. – Vol. 8, N 2. – P. 98–104.
Illes J., Racine E. Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics // The American j. of bioethics. – Cambridge (MA), 2005. – Vol. 9, N 2. – P. 5–18.
Lozada M., D’Adamo P., Fuentes M.A. Beneficial effects of human altruism // J. of theoretical biology. – Amsterdam, 2011. – Vol. 289. – P. 12–16.
Lynch Z. The neuro revolution: How brain science is changing our world. – N.Y.: St. Martin’s press, 2009. – 245 p.
Melony M. Moralizing biology: The appeal and limits of the new compassionate view of nature // History of the human sciences. – L., 2013. – Vol. 26, N 3. – P. 82–106.
Moll D., de Oliveira-Souza R., Zahn R. The neural basis of moral cognition: Sentiments, concepts and values // Annals of the New York Academy of sciences. – Hoboken (NJ), 2008. – Vol. 1124, N 1. – P. 161–180.
Nahmias E. Folk fears about freedom and responsibility: Determinism vs. reductionism // J. of cognition a. culture. – Leiden, 2006. – Vol. 6, N 1–2. – P. 215–237.
O’Connor C., Joffe Y. How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A review of the evidence // Public understanding of science. – Thousand Oaks (CA), 2013. – Vol. 22, N 3. – P. 254–268.
Pickersgill M., Cunningham-Burley S., Martin P.