Breakfast is a Dangerous Meal: Why You Should Ditch Your Morning Meal For Health and Wellbeing. Terence Kealey

Breakfast is a Dangerous Meal: Why You Should Ditch Your Morning Meal For Health and Wellbeing - Terence  Kealey


Скачать книгу
a letter to his friend John Reynolds, John Keats wrote on 3 February 1818 that ‘We hate poetry that has palpable design upon us’, but the problem with industrial science is that it can have impalpable designs on us. Caveat emptor.

       Industrially funded research: an alternative view

      I’ve presented a bleak view of industrially funded research, yet industry may sometimes be the only source of money for the investigation of unconventional truths. As Nina Teicholz chronicled in her 2014 book The Big Fat Surprise,10 by the 1960s the governmental and charitable funding agencies were so convinced that dietary fat was the cause of atherosclerosis that a heroic dissenter like John Yudkin, the author of the anti-sugar pro-fat 1972 book Pure, White and Deadly, was cornered into asking industry to support his heterodox research because no one else would.11 The ruthless leader of the dietary fat consensus, Ancel Keys, could then use that industrial support to smear ‘Yudkin and his commercial backers’.12

      In his 1776 Wealth of Nations Adam Smith argued that markets tend to be more open to new ideas than are universities or government agencies, which was echoed by Friedrich Hayek in his 1944 Road to Serfdom, where he showed how new entrants fructify markets with innovative ideas. My own 2008 book Sex, Science and Profits re-emphasised the innovative value of commercial science in challenging received wisdoms.13

      In his recent book Pharmaphobia, moreover, Thomas Stossel, a Harvard University professor of medicine, argues that only if university medical scientists work closely with industry – a closeness that will inevitably be rewarded with consultancy fees – will medical innovation be optimised.14

      Ultimately it is for the readers of a scientific paper to determine for themselves if they believe it has been biased by its funding source, and such matters of judgement cannot easily be codified.

       PART THREE

Breakfast Myths

       4

       Myth No. 1: Breakfast cereals are healthy

      Oh no they’re not. They’re largely carbohydrates befouled by sugar, and it is hard to think of a worse morning meal. In 2006 the British consumer protection magazine Which? examined 275 different breakfast cereals, finding that ‘Nearly 90 per cent of the cereals in our sample that targeted children were high in sugar, 13 per cent were high in salt and 10 per cent were high in saturated fat.’ The report was entitled Cereal Re-offenders, referring to the reluctance of the manufacturers to respond to repeated criticisms.1

      And though the manufacturers may add nutrients to their products, they will first have removed them: here is Felicity Lawrence’s account in her 2008 book Eat Your Heart Out of the denuding of cornflake nourishment:

      Cornflakes are generally made by breaking corn kernels into smaller grits which are then steam cooked in batches of up to a tonne under pressure of about 20lbs per square inch. The nutritious germ with its essential fats is first removed because, as the Kellogg brothers discovered all that time ago, it goes rancid over time and gets in the way of long shelf life. Flavourings, vitamins to replace those lost in processing and sugar may be added at this stage.2

      Consider niacin (vitamin B3). A deficiency of niacin causes a disease called pellagra, which is an unpleasant condition known for the four Ds: diarrhoea, dermatitis, dementia and death. Pellagra was once epidemic in the American south, and between 1905 and 1940 some 3 million people developed it, of whom about 100,000 died.3 Because niacin is found in meat, fish, eggs, fruit, vegetables, nuts, whole grains, fungi, beer and yeast extracts such as Marmite, pellagra is a disease of a very deficient diet, and the epidemic of the American south developed only because many of the inhabitants were so poor that they subsisted on a diet primarily of maize (corn) that had been ‘de-germed’ during its preparation. The de-germination removed the niacin from the cornmeal.fn1

      Partly because the folk memory of the pellagra epidemic has not been lost, and partly because niacin is cheap, the manufacturers of breakfast cereal now boast of how much of it they add, voluntarily, to their products. But, actually, too much is added, and if children today consumed no niacin-fortified foods, only 2.9 per cent of them would consume less than the EAR (Estimated Average Requirement). But currently 28 per cent of American children aged 2 to 8 years old ingest more than the recommended UL (upper limit) – and 2.9 per cent of children consuming less than the EAR may represent less of a public health risk than 28 per cent of them consuming more than the UL.4

      Other cereal supplements, too, have caused concern. Some manufacturers fortify their products with iron, and in consequence some children consume toxic amounts of it. And in consequence of that, certain countries such as Norway now ban the fortification of breakfast cereals with iron. The authors of a recent study concluded that: ‘Obtaining recommended daily allowances (RDAs) and adequate intakes (AIs) from nonfortified food continues to have the advantage of (i) providing intakes of other potential nutrients and food components, and (ii) potentially enhancing intakes through simultaneous interactions with other nutrients.’5 Which in English says: ‘Eat natural, not artificial, food. Avoid breakfast cereals.’

      If breakfast cereals were replaced by unprocessed, more natural foods, children would be healthier: after all, the consumption of ready-to-eat cereals is predominantly an English-speaking phenomenon, and there is no systematic evidence that non-Anglophonic children suffer for not consuming them.

      The unhealthiness of breakfast cereals has long inspired humour, and in his 1975 novel Changing Places David Lodge wrote that the campus newspaper: ‘had recently reported an experiment in which rats fed on cornflake packets had proved healthier than rats fed on the cornflakes’.6

      And this humour is translating into consumer resistance: Euromonitor International, the marketing company, report that since 2012 breakfast cereal sales in countries such as the USA and UK have fallen by at least 1 per cent a year; and the decline is predicted to continue as consumers increasingly switch to yoghurt, fresh fruits and other protein-based, more natural, low-carbohydrate, low-sugar products.7

      The US Department of Agriculture continues to defend breakfast cereals as becoming ever healthier,8 but consumers are, rightly, resisting the corporate message.

       Breakfast cereals and Caucasians

      Breakfast cereals are a largely Anglophonic phenomenon in part because they are generally served with milk, and milk is a challenge to most non-Caucasian adults: whereas 90 per cent of northern Europeans can drink half a pint of milk without feeling sick, only 40 per cent of southern Europeans and only 35 per cent of the rest of the world can do so. Milk was intended by nature, of course, to be drunk only by infants, and it contains a sugar, lactose,


Скачать книгу