Scotland: The Story of a Nation. Magnus Magnusson

Scotland: The Story of a Nation - Magnus  Magnusson


Скачать книгу
and he was ‘drawn’, like a chicken: his intestines were pulled from his belly, then his lungs and liver and finally his heart, when the long agony would come to an end. His innards were then ceremonially burned by the executioner. That was the second death, ‘for the measureless turpitude of his deeds towards God and Holy Church’. Only then was his lifeless body decapitated, for his outlawry – the third death.

      What remained of his body was now quartered – butchered into four parts – and the quarters were distributed to different parts of the country for exposure on gibbets in Newcastle upon Tyne, Berwick, Stirling and Perth ‘as a warning and a deterrent to all that pass by and behold them’. His head was placed on a spike and hoisted above London Bridge.

      Through the very public humiliation of a traitor’s death, King Edward must have believed that he would not only exterminate his enemy but extirpate his very existence. He was to be disappointed, for in the event he achieved the very opposite – he created a martyr. Elspeth King says:

      Edward was determined not to create a martyr, and that was why Wallace’s body had to be destroyed and dispersed; in order to destroy Wallace’s memory totally, Edward had to destroy Wallace’s body totally, to desecrate it and be utterly rid of it. There’s an exact parallel between that and the treatment of Joan of Arc a couple of centuries later, when she was literally destroyed by the English: her body was burned and the ashes cast away so that no trace of her might remain.

      But because of the very savagery of the treatment which Edward meted out to Wallace, the people of Scotland wanted desperately to remember him. Officially, Wallace ceased to exist; he was completely written out of Scottish history by John Barbour in The Brus, his epic poem about Bruce which was commissioned by the Bruce dynasty in the 1370s [see Chapter 11]. It was not until Blind Harry in the 1470s, a century later, that the stories of Wallace were collected and written down as a quasi-historical epic.

      These stories were part of what we can call a ‘people story’, because the people wanted to cling on to his memory, and the way of doing that was through personal, local remembrance in the areas in which Wallace had operated. That is why there are so many Wallace stones in Scotland, so many Wallace trees, so many Wallace wells – there is even a Wallace thumbprint on a rock on Bizzyberry Hill, near Biggar in Lanarkshire. The Irish have a word for this concept – dinnshenchas, the telling and constant retelling of stories around places, and the stories reinforce the identification of these geographical features. These stories grew in the telling; greater and greater deeds were ascribed to Wallace, as they are to heroic warriors all over the world.

      Today, more than ever, Wallace is popularly revered as the national hero of Scotland, the one man (unlike Robert Bruce) who never compromised with English tyranny. It is noteworthy that a 1996 film, The Bruce, made nothing like the impact of the earlier Braveheart: it was Braveheart, not The Bruce, which not only reflected but may well have influenced the growing popular movement for a separate Scottish Parliament. It can hardly be a coincidence that when the referendum which would ratify a new Scottish Parliament was held in 1997, the date chosen for the vote was 11 September – seven hundred years to the day since Wallace’s spectacular victory over the English army at Stirling Bridge on 11 September 1297.

      Scots wha hae wi’ Wallace bled,

      Scots, wham Bruce has often led,

      Welcome to your gory bed,

       Or to victorie …

       Lay the proud usurpers low!

       Tyrants fall in every foe!

       Liberty’s in every blow!

       Let us do or die!

       Chapter 11 ROBERT BRUCE (r.1306–29)

       Now, this Robert the Bruce was a remarkably brave and strong man: there was no


Скачать книгу