Fishing Flies. Smalley
appeared as a supplement to Walton’s fifth edition of 1676. Cotton knew Walton well enough to have built an elaborate stone fishing ‘temple’ (hardly a hut!), called ‘Piscatoribus Sacrum’, in Walton’s honour by the banks of his River Dove. Barker also knew Walton, so it likely that Cotton and Barker also knew each other and discussed their books during the writing.
Barker pointed out that there were two categories of flies when it came to trout fishing.
The first were what he called ‘palmers’; they had a cock hackle wound or palmered down the hook shank. These have almost disappeared save for a group of flies known as Bumbles. They are still tied and used to catch, mainly grayling, in the rivers of that part of England fished by Cotton (Staffordshire and Derbyshire). Two examples are the GRAYLING STEEL BLUE BUMBLE, see here, and GRAYLING WITCH, see here. They have also survived as trout flies in the loughs of Ireland and lochs of Scotland: examples include the GOLDEN-OLIVE BUMBLE and ZULU, see here & also here.
Charles Cotton, in a portrait from the frontis of The Compleat Angler.
The fishing hut, called Piscatoribus Sacrum, was built by Cotton in 1674 for a visit by Izaak Walton. It is on the bank of the River Dove, in England’s Peak District.
The second class of trout fly were winged flies and are still major trout flies today.
Now let us consult Cotton as to how to tie these flies and for some specific examples. It is important to understand that Cotton, like Walton, wrote in a theatrical, lyrical style. He had two actors, one playing the part of the expert fly-fisher (Piscator), the other the novice who has come for instruction (Viator). First of all, Piscator must show Viator what materials can be used to tie flies, and in those days the fly-fisher took a huge bag of silks, fur and feather, some exotic and expensive, to the waterside so that the real fly being eaten by the trout could be imitated.
PISCATOR. And now let me look out my things to make this fly. Boy! Come, give me my dubbing-bag here presently; and now, Sir, since I find you so honest a man, I will make no scruple to lay open my treasure before you.
VIATOR. Did ever any one see the like! What a heap of trumpery is here! Certainly never an angler in Europe has his shop half so well furnished as you have.
Piscator then gives Viator a verbal slap and points out that every item in his bag is indispensable. What would Viator think about our own twenty-first-century collections of ‘essential’ tying materials.
But then Cotton takes us through the tying of a fly. No vice …
PISCATOR. You see, first, how I hold my hook; and thus I begin. Look you, here are my first two or three whips around the bare hook; thus I join hook and line; thus I put on my wings; thus I twirl and lap on my dubbing; thus I work it up towards the head; thus I part my wings; thus I nip my superfluous dubbing from my silk; thus fasten; thus trim and adjust my fly. And there’s a fly made; and now how do you like it?
VIATOR. In earnest, admirably well; and it perfectly resembles a fly.
And what modern category of fly has a body, upright wings and no hackle? Why, the most effective category of dry fly, the hackleless dry fly (see here, and here)!
Four of Cotton’s flies have been selected to show the two styles, palmers and winged flies.
GREAT-HACKLE [a palmer], the body black, and wrapped with a red feather of a capon untrimmed; that is, the whole length of the hackle staring out …
WHITE HACKLE, the body of white mohair, and warped about with a white hackle-feather …
The artificial GREEN-DRAKE then is made upon a large hook, the dubbing of camel’s hair, bright bear’s hair, the soft down that is combed from a hog’s bristles, and yellow camlet, well mixt together; the body long, and ribbed about with green silk, or rather yellow, waxed with green wax, the whisks of the tail of the long hairs of sable, or fitchet [polecat], and the wings of the white-grey feather of a mallard, dyed yellow …
Cotton then tells how to dye the mallard feather yellow. That fly would catch any trout eating large duns anywhere today.
WHIRLING-DUN … is commonly made of the down of a fox-cub, which is of ash colour at the roots next to the skin, and ribbed about with yellow silk; the wings of the pale grey feather of a mallard.
CHETHAM’S STRANGE CONTRIBUTION
James Chetham published his Angler’s Vade Mecum in 1681, five years after Cotton’s contribution to The Compleat Angler. His flies are very similar to Cotton’s, but he insisted that, in addition to what the trout sees – what it smells or tastes like is also important.
Next folow Ointments and Receipts which I have read and been informed of, by several knowing Anglers … they’ll not only allure, but even compel Fish to bite … Take Man’s Fat and Cat’s Fat, of each half an Ounce, Mummy finely powdred three drams, Cummin-seed finely powdred one Dram, distill’d Oyl of Annise and Camphor four Grains, make an Ointment according to Art; and when you Angle anoint 8 inches of Line next to the Hook therewith …
FRENCH CONNECTION
By the beginning of the eighteenth century French fly-tyers were producing flies with a similar structure to those made in Britain, though often the body was of plain silk whereas the British school mostly used dubbed fur for their bodies. These French artificial flies matched closely real flies. Louis Liger gave several examples in his book Amusemens de Champagne (1709), reprinted in 1714 as Traite de toute sorte de Chasse et de Peche. The following is typical entry:
Dans le mois de May ils en fonte une, couverte aussi de soye, maise elle est de couleur rouge, et avec de filets tirans sur l’or: la tete en est noire, et on y joint les plumes rouge d’un capon.
This fly is an excellent imitation of the many species of upwinged fly spinner that have red or red-brown bodies.
TROUT FLY EVOLUTION INTO THE NINETEENTH CENTURY
During the 200 years following the publications of Barker and Cotton, three different styles of trout fly became established. The first was a winged fly that was an attempt to imitate real flies. This and the second style, the ‘buzz’ fly can best be seen in Alfred Ronalds’ The Fly-Fisher’s Entomology, which was first published in 1836 and was still in print in a new edition as late as 1921. His book was also the first to have fairly good illustrations of both the natural fly and corresponding imitative fly. The following are typical examples.
Plate 1
Plate