Software AG A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Your completed Software AG Scorecard will give you a clear presentation of which Software AG areas need attention.
Software AG
Scorecard Example
Example of how the finalized Scorecard can look like:
Software AG
Scorecard
Your Scores:
BEGINNING OF THE
SELF-ASSESSMENT:
Table of Contents
About The Art of Service7
Included Resources - how to access7
Purpose of this Self-Assessment9
How to use the Self-Assessment10
Software AG
Scorecard Example12
Software AG
Scorecard13
BEGINNING OF THE
SELF-ASSESSMENT:14
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE15
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:27
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:43
CRITERION #4: ANALYZE:57
CRITERION #5: IMPROVE:73
CRITERION #6: CONTROL:89
CRITERION #7: SUSTAIN:102
Software AG and Managing Projects, Criteria for Project Managers:126
1.0 Initiating Process Group: Software AG127
1.1 Project Charter: Software AG129
1.2 Stakeholder Register: Software AG131
1.3 Stakeholder Analysis Matrix: Software AG132
2.0 Planning Process Group: Software AG134
2.1 Project Management Plan: Software AG136
2.2 Scope Management Plan: Software AG138
2.3 Requirements Management Plan: Software AG140
2.4 Requirements Documentation: Software AG142
2.5 Requirements Traceability Matrix: Software AG144
2.6 Project Scope Statement: Software AG146
2.7 Assumption and Constraint Log: Software AG148
2.8 Work Breakdown Structure: Software AG150
2.9 WBS Dictionary: Software AG152
2.10 Schedule Management Plan: Software AG155
2.11 Activity List: Software AG157
2.12 Activity Attributes: Software AG159
2.13 Milestone List: Software AG161
2.14 Network Diagram: Software AG163
2.15 Activity Resource Requirements: Software AG165
2.16 Resource Breakdown Structure: Software AG167
2.17 Activity Duration Estimates: Software AG169
2.18 Duration Estimating Worksheet: Software AG171
2.19 Project Schedule: Software AG173
2.20 Cost Management Plan: Software AG175
2.21 Activity Cost Estimates: Software AG177
2.22 Cost Estimating Worksheet: Software AG179
2.23 Cost Baseline: Software AG181
2.24 Quality Management Plan: Software AG183
2.25 Quality Metrics: Software AG185
2.26 Process Improvement Plan: Software AG187
2.27 Responsibility Assignment Matrix: Software AG189
2.28 Roles and Responsibilities: Software AG191
2.29 Human Resource Management Plan: Software AG193
2.30 Communications Management Plan: Software AG195
2.31 Risk Management Plan: Software AG197
2.32 Risk Register: Software AG199
2.33 Probability and Impact Assessment: Software AG201
2.34 Probability and Impact Matrix: Software AG203
2.35 Risk Data Sheet: Software AG205
2.36 Procurement Management Plan: Software AG207
2.37 Source Selection Criteria: Software AG209
2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Software AG211
2.39 Change Management Plan: Software AG213
3.0 Executing Process Group: Software AG215
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Software AG217
3.2 Change Request: Software AG219
3.3 Change Log: Software AG221
3.4 Decision Log: Software AG223
3.5 Quality Audit: Software AG225
3.6 Team Directory: Software AG228
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Software AG230
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Software AG232
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Software AG234
3.10 Issue Log: Software AG236
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Software AG238
4.1 Project Performance Report: Software AG240
4.2 Variance Analysis: Software AG242
4.3 Earned Value Status: Software AG244
4.4 Risk Audit: Software AG246
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Software AG248
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Software AG250
5.0 Closing Process Group: Software AG252
5.1 Procurement Audit: Software AG254
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Software AG256
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Software AG258
5.4 Lessons Learned: Software AG260
Index262
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
2. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
3. Who should resolve the Software AG issues?
<--- Score
4. Are there Software AG problems defined?
<--- Score
5. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
6. Which