The Third. Covid liberalism. Almaz Braev
why did he become a Nazi instead of a cosmopolitan stockbroker, as happened in other civilized Europe?
Big brother.
How could a German family contribute to this?
How did a German official become wildly belligerent?
We could turn to the German tradition. To find the origins of statism in it. We found it in German feudalism. Others will say, why didn’t the same statism manifest itself in Europe in another dream? A radical tilt towards state interests is not only a disease of the Germans. But it was among the Germans that it became radical. Absolutism seems to grow out of absolutism. Totalitarianism from totalitarianism. Paternalism, from paternalism. Nothing is superfluous. So, what is the reason?
Any European father passes the inheritance to the eldest son. Not just German. This eldest son not only inherits lands and things, he passes on the habits of the family to his children. This is how the tradition develops, and this is how the people turn out. Fathers look at their older sons, and their sons try to adopt their father’s look. They imitate him in everything. The transmission from generation to generation of the father’s character, behavior, and style creates this nation. When fathers saw that to the eldest sons (namely, the eldest!) not enough land, not enough inheritance, they armed themselves and went on a campaign. Thus the entire feudal people armed themselves. But the ideologues were the eldest sons, the ones who take over and pass on the tradition from father to son.
In fact, the German official Nazi was not a feudal Lord in disguise, but a new copy of him. He was the eldest son of a German burgher. Throughout Europe, fathers passed on their covenants in the same way, through their elders. It was the older ones who were the heirs of the tradition, and of the property as well. That the people did not turn off the path trodden by their ancestors, and in the end did not disappear as a people, just all the older sons watched this. Some seniors grew old and passed them on to other seniors. Those in turn also grew old, but managed to teach their older sons. All these operations are somehow connected with the earth. There is an invisible connection, a sacred unity of tradition with the aristocracy. The only career for the eldest son is an honorary military career. All the officers in the army are the eldest sons. So why, with the advent of the market, would these senior officers not support the Nazi idea? Younger sons also became officers. If the eldest inherited all the property. The younger ones, having entered the military service, supported the very institution of the traditional family and society.
In the all Europe of the 20s and 30s was ruled by the military. Many modes: in Hungary (Admiral Miklos Horti), Romania (Marshal Antonescu), Poland (Marshal Pilsudski), Portugal (General De Costa), Spain (Generalissimo Franco) did not grow up to Nazism, to the ideology of total superiority, but were authoritarian regimes, dictatorships. But they were very similar to the German regime.
If you have noticed the connection of right-wing totalitarianism, right-wing statism with the entail, that is, with the institution of inheritance to the eldest sons, then now look at what the younger sons are doing at this time.
I would like to ask you to take a particularly close look at Russia. In addition will have to be considered in the development of the movement of anarchists from Italy, Spain and Russia have the same problem. This problem is not so much about bringing anarchism into the arena a little earlier than authoritarian and totalitarian regimes, but rather about getting the problem of younger sons out. In other words, any left-wing and other protest and themes of equality and social justice are tied to the problems of inheritance and the lack of it in the youngest.
«The old man has three sons: the Eldest was a clever fellow, the Middle son was a fool.…
CHAPTER IV
THE NOMADS ALL LOOK ALIKE
The eldest son is smart because he does like a father. The eldest son is the father’s copy. He can’t be stupid by definition. All the older sons are sedate, important, walk strictly, and speak little. Where have you seen old people talking incessantly and crossing the village from end to end? There are no such old people. Older people don’t have much energy. They’ve already used it up. Similarly, the older sons are not noticeable. Although there is still a lot of energy in them. The seniors will not waste it on trivial matters. Everyone is watching them. And the very first eyes in this observation are the eyes of the younger ones. The younger ones are the first to get slapped on the head by the older ones for indecent behavior and stupid behavior. Is there a demand from the younger ones? That’s why all the younger ones are spoiled behavioral waifs. Fools, almost like in a fairy tale by the storyteller Yershov.
If such sons were to inherit, how would they be able to pay them back? No way. They will drink it, waste it, and skip it. How similar it is to the behavior promoted by advertising-take, walk, take advantage of the moment, live is once! If younger sons were not festivalis older brothers, all younger sons it would be possible to write to the Democrats and refuge. Anyone who has had even a little experience with tradition in their biography, and there are many, if not all of them, they will not be able to be a Democrat, even if they are the youngest in the family. In order for the younger to turn into a complete traditional degenerate and reformer, a certain period of the traditional vacuum is necessary. This person should be detached from the tradition, not have younger brothers. Or maybe just the only child in the family. Then no demand. Only self-indulgence. Here the ideology of hedonism is just right. Is this why the ideas of freedom and a market society are popular among young people? After all, this is a different congregation, a city crowd.
Thus, for market apologetics and any other lack of ideas, you need to find a generation born without contact with the land (with the village, aul relatives, without relatives at all).All these young people – the children of the first citizens, and perhaps themselves are zeremids. Only those who did not fall into the ranks of the most loyal people of the ruling autocracy. They lose perspective and, like all younger sons as if deprived of the inheritance. But this conditional inheritance must also be given by the state. But they see, they know, they are also told that they will not see anything. Everything has already been captured and cleaned up by the current elite. They are told from the outside: «They will not share with you. This is not your system or your state»
Now, who was included in the group of the chosen, conditional eldest sons of the authoritarian regime?
After all, all officials in the world behave the same. But if a new autocracy has developed and the imposition of the market on the traditional people, the traditional foundation, what will happen?
Among nomads, the eldest sons behave the same way as the eldest sons of Europe and Russia. They are also invisible and not energetic. It looks like to these disciplined and quiet guys don’t need anything. The nomads have a minorat. The younger sons remain in family with their parents. The elders sons leave. Although they also cut the inheritance. In modern conditions, there is no other path left for the elders sons than that of the Gascon D’Artagnan. But when they get to megacities, they are again very accommodating and tolerant, unlike the Frenchman. It’s hard to tell who’s who among nomads. By culture, all sons behave like future heirs. They are also quiet and catch all the movements of the ruler. Autocracy is constructed by itself. It appeals to the life and circumstances of the moment and in general to the Asian culture itself. All zerafs and zeremids want to be officials, that is, heirs of the state. But «Every one that exalteth himself shall be humbled; but he that humbleth himself shall be exalted». It is impossible for everyone to get into the new elite. Because all unskilled serenity begin to whisper while shyly behind their barkers: Freedom! Democracy! Dictator get out! They were just immersed in the tradition completely. But seeing the futility of silence and the prospect of a whole lot of nothing, they wake up from their own culture’s hibernation. They want to discard the culture they have learned in the villages. And because of this, they also resemble younger sons, spoiled parents.
CHAPTER