Scientific Workflow Management System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
107. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
108. How would you define Scientific workflow management system leadership?
<--- Score
109. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
110. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Scientific workflow management system changes?
<--- Score
111. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
112. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
113. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
114. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
115. Is the Scientific workflow management system scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
116. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
117. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
118. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
119. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
120. How do you hand over Scientific workflow management system context?
<--- Score
121. What is the scope?
<--- Score
122. What system do you use for gathering Scientific workflow management system information?
<--- Score
123. Is special Scientific workflow management system user knowledge required?
<--- Score
124. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
125. Has a Scientific workflow management system requirement not been met?
<--- Score
126. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Scientific workflow management system brings?
<--- Score
127. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Scientific workflow management system leverage and how?
<--- Score
128. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
129. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
130. Why are you doing Scientific workflow management system and what is the scope?
<--- Score
131. What is the definition of Scientific workflow management system excellence?
<--- Score
132. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
133. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
134. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
135. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
136. What Scientific workflow management system requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
137. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
138. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
139. What was the context?
<--- Score
140. Is there any additional Scientific workflow management system definition of success?
<--- Score
141. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Scientific workflow management system Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
2. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
3. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
4. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
5. How is the value delivered by Scientific workflow management system being measured?
<--- Score
6. How sensitive must the Scientific workflow management system strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
7. Will Scientific workflow management system have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
8. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
9. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
10. How do you verify and validate the Scientific workflow management system data?
<--- Score
11. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
12. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
13. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
14.