.
How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
45. Have you included everything in your Team composition cost models?
<--- Score
46. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
47. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
48. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
49. What are hidden Team composition quality costs?
<--- Score
50. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
51. Among the Team composition product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
52. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Team composition? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
53. Is the cost worth the Team composition effort ?
<--- Score
54. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
55. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
56. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
57. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
58. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
59. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
60. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
61. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
62. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
63. What are the costs of delaying Team composition action?
<--- Score
64. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
65. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
66. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
67. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
68. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
69. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
70. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
71. Does a Team composition quantification method exist?
<--- Score
72. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
73. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
74. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
75. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
76. At what cost?
<--- Score
77. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
78. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
79. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
80. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
81. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
82. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
83. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
84. What are the current costs of the Team composition process?
<--- Score
85. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
86. Which Team composition impacts are significant?
<--- Score
87. Are indirect costs charged to the Team composition program?
<--- Score
88. What is the Team composition business impact?
<--- Score
89. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
90. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
91. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
92. How sensitive must the Team composition strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
93. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
94. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
95. Will Team composition have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
96. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
97. Do you have any cost Team composition limitation requirements?
<--- Score
98. How do you verify if Team composition is built right?
<--- Score
99. What are your key Team composition organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
100. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
101. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
102. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
103. Does the Team composition task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
104. How can a Team composition test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<---