Covert Military Strategy The Theory Of War. Perry JD Ritthaler

      When you read this e-book you will find many articles that were sent to very powerful people in the world.

      The Theory Of War…The Role Ethics And Morals Play On The Battlefield Posted Aljazeera Jan. 21 2013

      Thank you for taking your valuable time to read this article written on the theory of war.

      Who kills on the battlefield fighting war and terrorism? Perhaps a better question to ask is; why do these wars and terrorist activities take place on the battlefield in the world.

      Do you think the terrorist is a rich man’s pawn or is the military fighting the war on terrorism the rich man’s pawn? The spread of democracy is a noble cause however when the moral conviction of the leader or terrorist organization is unscrupulous many issues come into play.

      For example when a political leader condones the act of a drone strike that murders a person rather than a capture resulting in a trial; that action taken also results in collateral damage and killing of more innocent people; the activities self-perpetuate the acts of terrorism and more killing created on the battlefield. This is big money created by murder because the big banks and corporations that sell the weapons and drive up mineral resources prices are partially based on turmoil in the environment that allows them to cash out in stock market investment; well I want to say scams however it appears they can bend the rules to make the money creation appear legal. The same corporations or affiliate that mutually financially benefits creates the operations designed to lobby the politician that cast the order to murder through drone attacks or by covertly shaping foreign policy casting fear into a nations mind with claims of “that nation has a weapon of mass destruction or they may be thinking of building a weapon of mass destruction.” (So let’s sanction the easy targets and create more desperation and turmoil in a region and environment designed to promote terrorism; so we can use this terrorism through retaliation to spread our rotted democracy agenda covering the intentions of big money making through corporate invasion schemes.)

      This is much like a mob boss asking his henchman to murder a apposing company so he can make a profit when the market price soars due to that company’s inability to hit manufacturing targets and left in finacial turmoil unable to produce the products as quickly; hence creating a higher product price demand for the product the mob boss retails.

      The biggest difference is the mob boss makes a fraction of what this political corporate con created using our unethical or immoral democracy as a weapon. Do you think the politician is so dumb they do not know this violation of democracy ethics and morals is a criminal act? Or do you think the politicians are so smart they use this issue to hide the criminal operation. This brings us to the question of how do morals and ethics shape the target killings committing murder for profit manufacturing the death of woman and children on a battlefield?

      So who killed the terrorist and collateral damage people involved in the drone strike and why? In retaliation who do you think killed the people targeted by the IED or suicide bomber launched to fight back against the drone strike that killed their leader and why? Could the terrorist group be financially targeted like the Politian is lobbied by corporations? Who passed the law to treat the corporation like a person allowing this criminal activity to flourish and who asked the Supreme Court to consider the law change in the democracy? So let me guess if you make the Supreme Court an accomplice to the criminal acts and human rights violation why would you ever see a politician brought to trial?

      Before you hate the banker; do you think the banker is a pawn for the ultimate rich that hire fire board members if profit margins are not increased every year? What happens if guilty by association the ethics and morals of the ultimate rich are tarnished further? For example if the ultimate rich watch the leader of free world; a sitting President, launch a drone strike killing of a civilian or freedom fighter and not be taken to trial for the orchestration of murder for corporate profit; that played a role in his election through six pack funding; will that action play a role in establishing ethical and moral guideline for the ultimate rich? Is this the reason for the USA super power demise? Let me guess those politically in charge will be the new ultimate rich long gone when the country falls. This really opens the door to being a creative criminal; right or wrong?

      How could disgrace of a political leadership action get started; what roots are rotting the Western democracy used as a weapon verses a tool to build freedom, peace opportunity or prosperity designed to increase manufacturing and tourism potentials of a nation. Do you think the invasion of Iraq or the creation of the 911 attacks in New York played a role in starting this corruption of ethics and morals violations in a nation’s democracy leadership agenda and fall from super power status or demise of country credit rating?

      Before you hate the ultimate rich being manipulated by offshore corporations that engineered this agenda; controlled by governments looking to take the role of being the global super power through enhanced manufacturing capabilities; that actually take the manufacturing away on the USA or West; using ethics and moral issues as weapons against the Western world created by the synergy of spreading a rotted democracy design; to enhance their super power status while the politicians and corporations fill their pockets on the backs of the taxpayer. Hold it are you thinking that if a country spreads a lack of ethics and morals in their political foreign policy agenda that nation is susceptible to self-demise created by their own momentum and energies to grow their super power status agenda. Is this like a check mate move for China?

      Be careful how you think because if that were the case those same corporations and ultimate rich would be looking for more ways to spike global profits through expanded covert criminal activities. Who could these people covertly murder similar to the war on terrorism agenda and how could the war on terror be expanded by this next corporate operation? After all the highest profits in economics are created when innocent human beings are targeted and murdered; without this conflict huge corporate profits would be much harder to attain. When you do an analysis like most people they follow on a path similar to water; moving toward the path of least resistance. However with rotted morals and ethics in the political leadership arena; used for creating murder for profit; who do you think is the next target and why?

      These people usually like to kill people with weapons less superior to their weapons; or just butcher and murder people that have no weapons. So who fits the corporate parasite pattern for the growth of this type of political corporate leadership agenda? For example who will a company like “Morgan Stanley investment bankers” make the biggest profits on in 2012? Let me guess they will go after the food supply on the planet and create a series of corporate moves that drive up food prices that create thousands of deaths in starvation. This is a very unethical move however with enhanced poverty and lack of food even more desperation is created in the African environment and you guessed it more terrorism will be easier to create.

      So now you have two unethical operations led by the politicians and ultimate rich in order to create giant profit margins taking even more money out of the hands of poor or middle class and rich. The payoff is the increase in terrorism affiliated with these operations in Africa; where enhanced violence and terrorism is needed to stimulate corporate invasion to steal that countries mineral resources. Hence getting rid of Omar Kaddafi; the old genius leader with ethics and morals that led Libya into a higher lifestyle than Saudi Arabia or Russia or the USA; so why did France attack Libya and why are they attacking the rebels in Mali when they back the rebels in Syria? What happens when you lead a terrorist organization