Healing World Trauma with the Therapeutic Spiral Model. Группа авторов
Then the director has to speak up, either to redirect the auxiliary as indicated—yes, the auxiliary, too, is subject to direction and correction—or role-reverse both so as to have the protagonist produce the corrected action. Given proper identity, the protagonist can once again go into role reversal. I learned these things especially while being the protagonist in my own dramas. Such an event is called “falling out of one’s track,” meaning that the track is wrong and must be re-established and honored, however bizarre it may appear to others.
One motto is: “Be sure you’re not doing your psychodrama on your protagonist.” That is true for auxiliary ego and director, as well. Sometimes we need to remind ourselves of that. This is someone else’s life even if it reminds us of our own, because it is not our own. Step back and listen carefully. We have to remain modest as director and realize that we cannot “save” every relationship. Some may have to be relinquished. That is also true for some of those in our own life.
I would like to end with a story about when Moreno met Freud in 1917. Freud had asked the younger man what he was doing and Moreno replied, “You analyze people’s dreams. I give them the courage to dream again!” (Moreno 1921).
References
Horvatin, T. and Schreiber, E. (eds) (2006) The Quintessential Zerka: Writings by Zerka Toeman Moreno on Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
Hudgins, M.K. (2009) Personal Communication. Available from author.
Hudgins, M.K., Cho, W.C., Lai, N.W., and Ou, G.T. (2004) The Therapeutic Spiral in Taiwan 2000–2005. Paper presented at the Pacific Rim Conference for the International Association of Group Psychotherapy, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hudgins, M.K., Culbertson, R., and Hug, E. (eds) (2009) Action Against Trauma: A Trainer’s Manual for Community Leaders Following Traumatic Stress. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia, Foundation for the Humanities, Institute on Violence and Culture. Available at: www.lulu.com/shop/search.ep?keyWords=action+against+traum+trainers+manual&categoryId, accessed on September 12, 2012.
Hudgins, M.K. and Drucker, K. (1998) “The Containing Double as part of the Therapeutic Spiral Model for treating trauma survivors.” The International Journal of Action Methods 51, 2, 63–74.
Hudgins, M.K., Drucker, K., and Metcalf, K. (2000) “The Containing Double: A clinically effective psychodrama intervention for PTSD.” The British Journal of Psychodrama and Sociodrama 15, 1, 58–77.
Moreno, J.L. (1921) Words of the Father. Beacon, NY: Beacon House Press.
Moreno, J.L. (1953) Who Shall Survive? Beacon, NY: Beacon House Press. Available at: www.asgpp.org/html/library.html, accessed on September 12, 2012.
Moreno, J.L. (1944) “Sociodrama: The drama of groups.” Sociometry: A Journal of Inter-Personal Relations 6, 4, 434–449.
Moreno, J.L. (1946/1994) Psychodrama Volume I. New York, NY: Beacon House Press. Available at: www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=Psychodrama+Volume+1, accessed on September 12, 2012.
Moreno, J.L. and Moreno, Z.T. (1969) Psychodrama Volume II. New York, NY: Beacon House Press. Available at: http://books.google.com/books?id=kcpGAAAAYAAJ&q=Psychodrama+Volume+II&dq=Psychodrama+Volume+II&source, accessed on September 12, 2012.
Moreno, Z.T. (2006) “Writings by Zerka T. Moreno on Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy.” In Quintessential Zerka (eds) T. Horvatin and E. Schreiber. New York: Routledge.
Moreno, Z.T., Blomqvist, D., and Rutzel, T. (eds) (2000) Psychodrama, Surplus Reality and the Art of Healing. London: Routledge.
Rauch, S.L., van der Kolk, B.A., Fisler, R.E., Alpert, N.M., et al. (1996) “A symptom provocation study of posttraumatic stress disorder using positron emission tomography and script-driven imagery.” Archives of General Psychiatry 53, 5, 380–387.
Slobowski, S. (2009) A Manual of Quantum Physics and Consciousness. Class Handout. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
Chapter 2
The Similarities and
Differences Between Classical
Psychodrama and the
Therapeutic Spiral Model
Kate Hudgins, Ph.D., TEP, and
Francesca Toscani, M.Ed., TEP
Introduction
It has been a long journey, sometimes circuitous, but this chapter details the unfailing and unflagging allegiance of Therapeutic Spiral Model (TSM) to the foundations of classical psychodrama. It also describes the clinical reasons for the changes of TSM from an interpersonal to an intrapsychic model of experiential psychotherapy. We show the clinical modifications to the core interventions of classical psychodrama as described in Chapter 1, all the while respecting its original forms and methods. A description of the Six Safety Action Structures (Cox 2001) and the TSM Action Healing Team (Toscani 1995a) are included here since they are adaptations of classical psychodrama’s techniques and earliest methodology.
Like Chapter 3, this chapter includes much detailed clinical information and suggestions for action intervention. Please feel free to read and digest it at your own pace and, we hope, you will soon integrate the knowledge and structures into your role repertoire.
The Therapeutic Spiral Model
TSM has its base in classical psychodrama theory and methodology, especially those of spontaneity, creativity, and role theories (Hudgins 2008, 2007a, b, 2002, 2000, 1998, 1989; Hudgins, Culbertson, and Hug 2009; Toscani and Hudgins 1993; Toscani 1996; Lai et al., In Press). Using basic psychodrama techniques clinically modified for safety and containment, TSM adds to classical psychodrama the latest knowledge and research in clinical psychology and neurobiology about the treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). TSM places an unusual emphasis on safety and containment both for the protagonist working on trauma repair and for group members who are fully involved during the dramatic process at all times. An important teaching from neurobiology, as well as clinical observation, is not to overwhelm the brain with intense emotions or uncontrolled regression and all of the TSM clinical action structures have been dedicated to this goal from the very beginning.
Neurobiology and PTSD
Learning about the latest research on the neurobiology of the brains of persons with PTSD was an affirmation of the clinical therapeutic interventions we had been making for years with TSM. Here we give a simple review of three changes in the brain that result from the experience of trauma and violence, regardless of the stressor—childhood abuse, domestic violence, natural catastrophe, war trauma, accidents, or illness. (Please see Ed Hug’s Chapter 4 for more detailed information.)
Right-Brain–Left-Brain Split
PTSD, as defined in the DSM-IV-R (APA 2000), is caused by experiencing a single episode or continuing episodes of stress that overwhelm normal coping abilities, leaving the person helpless and terrified. What neurobiology shows is that overwhelming emotional stress shuts down the left-brain cognitive functions. The trauma remains unprocessed in the right-brain and stays there as sensory data without words—body sensations, feelings, smells, fragments of images. Research has shown that experiential treatment is more effective than cognitive behavioral therapy to treat PTSD because these right-brain symptoms are not accessible to talk therapy (Elliott, Davis, and Slatick 1998; Rausch et al. 1996).
The