Life and Science. The speed of light. World broadcast. Time Machine. Morphogenetic fields. Replication of objects. Unsupported movement. Rem Wоrd
reflections of the mark in the form B
3. brightest reflection of the mark in B
4. development of the reflection of the mark on the membrane, side view
5.ink solution B
6. form A ink solution
7. мembrane Form A
8. “mark” on the membrane
9. “mark” on membrane A, top view
10. form A
11. reflection of the mark in the form of A
The experience starts. An hour later, the outline of the mark appears on sheet A. In other places. Which, obviously, repeat in their properties the area adjacent directly to the label.
And, similar outlines appear on sheet B. Yes, action at a distance. Scientific magic. If you like, quantum teleportation is for the poor.
The first experience is the clearest. He delights the soul of the experimenter very much. The second one is so-so, but it is also good. The third is practically nothing. Fourth, we begin to worry, rush, and reproach ourselves for imaginary negligence. But that’s all right. The more one experiment is similar to another, the more they are related. It does not even matter whether such an attitude existed in the past or exists now. In general, the pileup of “souls” of the same experiences in one place smears the results in the present time. The law of extinction of reactions is only a particular manifestation of a much more interesting and extensive System of interaction of similarities in Space of Time.
Simple in the present. Inseparable continuum
“And there is no more time”
A series of repetitive reactions according to the same scenario tends to fade away. These reactions include almost everything – from interactions of atoms to biological cycles. The first result is maximum, decline, rise, decline – and a plateau of monotonous low-intensity reactions. The past affects the present. Action is aimed at blurring the results of the next similar Phenomenon.
Are you yawning already? Then a short spoiler. What is the meaning of research?
…If we unravel the mechanism of this action, then… We will be able to see the Past itself. Time, in its entirety… Or even materialize the necessary fragments of it. Modeled after the present. A pleasant bonus is the victory over aging.
Do you know what the Pauli principle is? We open our beloved Wikipedia. “Pauli’s principle can be formulated as follows: within one quantum system in a given quantum state there can be only one fermion, and the state of the other must differ by at least one quantum number.” Fermion is all atoms of the periodic table. In addition to helium, and even then, at temperatures around absolute zero.
The Pauli Prohibition principle in human language sounds like this. In one atom there should not be two completely identical particles, in one molecule, in a cluster (speck of dust) … The dimensions of a “quantum system” are simply not defined by physics textbooks. The mechanism of repulsion, or even rejection of complete mutual similarities is not considered. So it is, that’s all. Leave me alone. Let’s not go into details…
Two separate identical macroscopic objects also have the same set of energetically identical microparticles. Is it okay that I used the same words in one phrase? This is prohibited by the rules of the literary language. Each atom of, say, our galvanized plate can be opposed to a “forbidden” atom from another plate. Inside them, there are initially no completely identical microparticles.
What happens if you connect two identical material objects visible to the eye? Explosion? Annihilation? Warm, but not quite. Let’s postpone this question for another time. Now let’s try to reverse the Pauli exclusion principle along the vertical. In quantum mechanics, not that is allowed. So, in our opinion, it is forbidden to find identical objects not only in one small area of space, but also in time. It is possible to show some dissatisfaction of the Space of Time with the repetition of the past, for example, if one reproduces the same reactions without leaving the place. Chemical or biological, not much difference. The past suppresses the present according to the schedule you already know:
Decay graph of reactions
Did you understand? By performing a physicochemical experiment, we can find out for sure whether a similar experiment was put here before. A certain complication of the research scheme makes it possible to determine some of the distinctive features of the object that was in a given place.
This is a victory over Time
I don’t quite understand what this picture means, but let it be an illustration. The past in the present
The past is in the present. Or – zero speed of light
Speed of light and memory of place. How is this interconnected?
In addition to the modernized Pauli principle, there is another variant of the development of ideas about the mechanisms of memorizing the Universe of the events that took place in it. Perhaps they are the same thing, only a side view
…The paradox, dear friends, is that the speed of light is constant and non-constant at the same time. How can this be?
Our eye sees predominantly in a narrow yellow-green spectrum. A certain length of light waves. Infrared range. Ultraviolet – no longer. We know this and do not complex about it. Our capabilities are complemented by special devices.
And this does not mean at all that light with wavelengths greater or less than the yellow-green part of the spectrum does not exist.
Postulates of the Theory of Relativity. They are known in all languages of the world. Let us draw the red forbidding line
The same is true for the speed of light. Here, not only the eye, but also most of the known devices cannot “see” light, the speed of which differs from the standard value “C”, three hundred thousand kilometers per second. Particles of light, photons, they are sometimes waves, pass through them unnoticed. Energy levels do not match. All this correlates perfectly with the well-known laws of physics. This state of affairs is illustrated by the almost everyday Mössbauer effect.
…By and large, the constancy of the speed of light is very necessary for quantum mechanics. Without it, Maxwell’s basic equations simply refuse to work. But this decision may well resolve the paradox and allow one to move towards new horizons.
Thermal imagers, X-ray machines, and other devices that operate with beams of different frequencies are useful and important. Well, is that all? Imagine now that we are entering a fundamentally new line of devices that allow you to see “fast” or “slow” non-standard light. That’s quite possible. You just need to know how.
And what will we see?
Frozen near objects, light clouds emitted by them. Light with a speed of zero, or near-zero relative to the atoms that emitted them. Reflective body structure. Weak, specific, but affecting rough matter. And I, dear friends, will once again allow myself to use a tempting picture. A vision of an ancient sailing ship on the site of a dry sea. Who Said Science and Feelings Can’t Be Together? Like two equal wings of a bird…
Without words… And with words. According to some assumptions, “slow” light sensors are capable of registering