Probability and Statistical Inference. Robert Bartoszynski
rel="nofollow" href="#fb3_img_img_d5c715c1-a121-5574-8365-5908b7260603.png" alt="images"/> but not to
The symmetric difference,
Example 1.13
In Example 1.12, the difference
Next, we introduce the following important concept:
Definition 1.3.8 If
Based on Example 1.12, we know that the following two events are disjoint:
Example 1.14 shows that to determine whether or not events are disjoint, it is not necessary to list the outcomes in both events and check whether there exist common outcomes. Apart from the fact that such listing is not feasible when sample spaces are large, it is often simpler to employ logical reasoning. In the case above, if the results alternate and end with tails, then the outcome must be THT. Since there are more tails than heads,
The definitions of union and intersection can be extended to the case of a finite and even infinite number of events (to be discussed in the Section 1.4). Thus,
is the event that contains the sample points belonging to
is the event that contains the sample points belonging to
Example 1.15
Suppose that
A perceptive reader may note that the unions
where the union of only two events is formed in each set of parentheses. The property of associativity (below) shows that parentheses can be omitted so that the expression
The operations on events defined in this section obey some laws. The most important ones are listed below.
Idempotence:
Double complementation:
Absorption:
In particular,
which in view of (1.3) means that
Commutativity: