Risk Assessment. Marvin Rausand

Risk Assessment - Marvin Rausand


Скачать книгу
12100 (2010). Safety of machinery – general principles for design: risk assessment and risk reduction, International standard ISO 12100. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

      11 ISO 31000 (2018). Risk management – guidelines, International standard. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

      12 ISO Guide 73 (2009). Risk management – vocabulary, Guide. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

      13 Jaynes, E.T. (2003). Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      14 Johansen, I.L. (2010). Foundations of Risk Assessment. ROSS report 201002. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

      15 Kaplan, S. (1997). The words of risk analysis. Risk Analysis 17: 407–417.

      16 Kaplan, S. and Garrick, B.J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1 (1): 11–27.

      17 Khan, F.I. and Abbasi, S.A. (2002). A criterion for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 15 (6): 467–475.

      18 Kim, D., Kim, J., and Moon, I. (2006). Integration of accident scenario generation and multiobjective optimization for safety‐cost decision making in chemical processes. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 19 (6): 705–713.

      19 Klinke, A. and Renn, O. (2002). A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk‐based, precaution‐based, and discourse‐based strategies. Risk Analysis 22 (6): 1071–1094.

      20 Leveson, N. (2004). A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science 42 (4): 237–270.

      21 Lindley, D.V. (2007). Understanding Uncertainty. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

      22 Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.

      23 MIL‐STD‐882E (2012). Standard practice for system safety. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.

      24 Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High‐Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.

      25 Phimister, J.R., Bier, V.M., and Kunreuther, H.C. (eds.) (2004). Accident Precursor Analysis and Management: Reducing Technological Risk Through Diligence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

      26 Rausand, M., Høyland, A., and Barros, A. (2020). System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, 3e. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

      27 Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate.

      28 Rosa, E.A. (1998). Metatheoretical foundations for post‐normal risk. Journal of Risk Research 1 (1): 15–44.

      29 Rosness, R., Guttormsen, G., Steiro, T. et al. (2004). Organizational Accidents and Resilient Organizations: Five Perspectives. STF38 A04403. Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF.

      30 Royal Society (1992). Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management. London: Report of a Royal Society study group, Royal Society.

      31 Suchman, E.A. (1961). A conceptual analysis of the accident problem. Social Problems 8 (3): 241–246.

      32 Treasury Board (2001). Integrated Risk Management Framework. Catalogue Number BT22‐78/2001. Ottawa, Canada: Treasury Board of Canada. ISBN: 0‐622‐65673‐3.

      33 U.S. DOE (1996). Process Safety Management for Highly Hazardous Chemicals. DOE‐HDBK‐1101‐86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.

      Notes

      1 1 The tolerability of risk is discussed in Chapter 5.

      2 2 The main terms are defined and discussed later in this chapter.

      3 3 Human errors are discussed further in Chapter 15.

      3.1 Introduction

      A systematic study to identify and describe what can go wrong and what the causes, the likelihoods, and the consequences might be.

      Definition 3.2 (Risk assessment)

      The process of planning, preparing, performing, and reporting a risk analysis, and evaluating the results against risk acceptance criteria.

      3.1.1 The Role of the Risk Analyst

      The main role of the risk analyst is to answer the three questions in the definition of risk in Section 2.2.1 , and to carry out the risk analysis as correctly and accurately as possible. The analyses and the evaluations should be as objective as the available data permit, and they should be neutral, impartial, and dispassionate.

      Remark 3.1 (Terminology)

      Some authors do not distinguish between a risk analysis and a risk assessment, but use the two terms as synonyms.

      The activities are not always carried out in the same sequence as shown in Figure 3.2 . Several activities may be performed in parallel, and we may also jump backwards


Скачать книгу