The Disappearance of Butterflies. Josef H. Reichholf
down, the croaking of the pool frogs rose to a final climax in polyphonic harmony, the noise feathering the surface of the gravel pit pond. Now it was the tree frogs’ turn to start their part. But only one managed a short ‘ep, ep, ep’ and then went quiet. It was, after all, already too late in the year for the tree frogs. They give their concerts in April or at the start of May. Now rats investigated the rubbish heaps on the bank. Dark silhouettes, they scurried over rubble and household rubbish, looking for anything edible. For a few moments they distracted me from observing the aquatic moths. Looking through my low-light binoculars, I saw that there were brown rats of all sizes. There were some true giants, or so it seemed to me, that would have made deadly foes for cats. But there were also small ones that hunted around with their mothers and never strayed from their sides. As a trembling shadow flitted across the binoculars’ field of vision, I noticed that there were also bats swirling around me. They were catching water insects over the pond. Twilight is the flight time for caddis flies and mayflies. As I pointed the focused beam of my torch this way and that they rose into the air in every direction. Late dusk turned to darkness. I had taken the torch with me in order to see for how long the aquatic moths flew. It seemed that they did not fly late into the night: in the last rays of daylight I recognized considerably fewer of them over the water surface.
The moths withdrew to the banks. From their short hovering flights, they landed on the stalks of plants and kept quiet. Perhaps it had become too cool for them, I thought, and felt for myself the moist, fresh chill of the early summer night. Based on these first impressions, I would have to measure the decrease in brightness and temperature. For the decrease in brightness, the light meter I still used to adjust the aperture of my camera in the 1960s ought to suffice. Measuring the air temperature would not be so easy, as I soon found out through attempts with a laboratory thermometer, since it showed very different temperatures depending on its proximity to the water surface, the reeds and the distance that I held it from my body. In field work half a century ago, we were a long way off today’s precise temperature measurements. The counting of the flying moths was also rather problematic, to put it mildly. They swarmed so erratically over the water surface and along the edges of the reedbeds. In the dwindling evening light, they would gradually become more and more numerous, and then suddenly peter out. Counting attempts carried out rapidly one after another gave embarrassingly different figures. My conviction that I would be able to obtain an interesting doctoral thesis about these delightful moths using these methods gave way, over the next few evenings that I spent at the pond, to nascent anxiety as to whether I would be able to obtain findings that would be reliable and novel enough. Without doubt, it would still be necessary to keep the caterpillars in aquariums, together with the water plants they ate. The enclosures for the adult butterflies would have to be improved and redesigned so that they were closer to natural conditions. Obviously, conditions for making observations outside by the pond would not be ideal every evening.
It soon became apparent that, despite the convenience of having ponds with the aquatic moths almost by my front door, field research would have to contend with the weather and with unpredictable events. For example, a few weeks after the beginning of my investigations, one of the gravel pits was converted into a carp pond. Consequently, all the water plants there were immediately destroyed. At least back then, few of the fertilizers and poisons used in agriculture found their way into the gravel pits or the oxbow lakes in the riparian forest. I never suspected that a mere decade after the conclusion of my investigations, the pits would all be destroyed. They were filled in, levelled and planted with trees or turned back into arable land. Of all people, it was the nature conservationists who did this, declaring them to be ‘wounds in the landscape’ that had to be closed. New wounds of this kind would not be permitted, allowing the landscape to remain ‘intact’. I still feel a pang whenever I go past the places where I carried out the field research for my doctorate. Some are covered by maize fields, while on one of them trees have grown and formed a small copse. They have all been filled in. Small losses such as these begin to erode one’s sense of home. But back to the lifecycle of the brown china-mark. By continuing, I hope to show why these little beings fascinated me so much that they would affect me for the rest of my life as a zoologist, and why they became icons for me, for Lepidoptera in general.
The hidden lives of the little nymphs
Let us start with a successful search flight in early summer. It is the males who jiggle around in the evening twilight. They are searching for females, newly emerged ones that are still unmated. With a delightful little experiment, I was able to follow what was going on. Taking a female that had emerged in the aquarium at home, I put her into a mini cage of the type that beekeepers use to house queen bees for short periods. The attractant that the female produces escapes through the vented sides and is then dispersed by the air currents. Once the search flights of the males had started, I sent this virgin female off onto the open water of the pond on a polystyrene raft in the twilight. After just a few minutes, the erratic flights of the males became target-oriented trajectories. Dozens of males landed on the cage. With their abdomens stretched through the lattice of the cage, they attempted to reach the female. I had attached the little raft to a piece of string and could thus pull it towards me on the bank. The males followed as if drawn by a magnetic force They were not frightened away when I pulled out the stopper and released the female onto the floating leaves of the water knotweed or amphibious bistort, Polygonum amphibium. Barely was she freed, when one of the males captured her for copulation and would not let her go. The others did not have a chance. They left the pair and continued with their search flights. Here and there I noticed one or other of them landing and pairing with another female sitting on a floating leaf. The slightly more sombre-coloured females were not at all easy to spot in the evening half-light, as they sat on the floating leaves.
The next morning, the newly mated female begins her own search, this time for somewhere to lay her eggs. She flies ever closer over the surface of the water until she finds floating leaves without the notched edges that indicate that there are already caterpillars feeding there. She considers different species of water plants that spread their leaves on the water surface. After landing, the female carefully probes the leaf with her legs. Floating broad-leaved pondweed, Potamogeton natans, water knotweed (amphibious bistort), Polygonum amphibium, yellow floating heart (or fringed water-lily), Nymphoides peltata, and the young, fine leaves of water-lilies, Nymphaea sp. The floating leaves of the yellow floating heart (fringed water-lily), with its striking yellow flowers, are particularly suited for the caterpillars to grow and thrive. But this member of the bogbean family, which has evolved into a water plant, is only very rarely found. The variety of water plants mentioned here illustrates that the brown china-mark is not adapted to specific forage plants. Their caterpillars can actually be successfully fed on lettuce, admittedly with effects that I had not anticipated and that became very instructive.
When the female has found a suitable leaf, she pushes herself backwards towards its edge and curves the tip of her abdomen over it in such a manner as to reach the underside of the floating leaf. This is not at all easy for her, since she must overcome the resistance of surface tension. Close to the edge of the leaf, the female then sticks a cluster of 100–180 eggs on its underside. These are moistened by the water. The small caterpillars develop quickly. Precisely how quickly depends on how warm the water is during the early summer period. As they hatch, the caterpillars bite through the eggshell and gnaw their way into the tissue of the leaf. If the leaf is thick, as with the water-lily, then they will simply carry on eating; they ‘mine’, to be precise. With thinner leaves, they soon cut out a little piece and cover themselves with it. The finest insoluble silk threads hold the leaf segment, initially only 2–3 millimetres long, in place.
In this state, and in the next stage following the first moult, the caterpillar is moistened by the water in its tiny leaf tube. It breathes through its skin. The breathing holes, the spiracles and the trachea already exist, but remain closed in the first two stages of the caterpillar’s life. Later on, air will be drawn through them into the body and the excreted carbon dioxide expelled. After the first moult, the caterpillar fashions for itself a proper leaf tube with base and lid. This also contains water and the caterpillar continues to breathe through its skin. However, this changes when it reaches the third larval stage. The caterpillar, having moulted the skin that