Art in Theory. Группа авторов
design by Wiley
The past is never dead. It’s not even past. William Faulkner
Acknowledgements
Our foremost thanks go to those numerous authors and copyright‐holders who have permitted us to reproduce the texts here included and to edit them as required for the present anthology. We are also indebted to the translators and editors of previous anthologies and other publications who have made material available to us. They have all helped us to realize our intention of providing as comprehensive a collection as possible of this most complex and diverse of subjects.
In the long task of tracing and compiling material we have benefitted from the advice and assistance of friends and colleagues in The Open University and elsewhere. In the present Open University Art History Department we would particularly like to thank Emma Barker, Warren Carter, Amy Charlesworth, Kathleen Christian, Leah Clark and Renate Dohmen. (A selection of relevant publications from the department has been added as a supplement to the bibliography.) The efforts of the Document Delivery Team at the Open University Library have also been crucial.
We would like to extend special thanks to the four readers who commented and made additional suggestions for inclusion in our proposed table of contents: Michael Corris, Alex Potts, Tilo Reifenstein and Ann Stephen. We would also like to thank Michael Baldwin, Peter Berry, Richard Brown, Tom Crow, Steve Edwards, Briony Fer, Suman Gupta, Therese Hadchity, David Johnson, Donna Loftus, Robin Mackie, Siobhan McDermott, Andrew McNamara, Josh Milani, Ann Miles, Giulia Paoletti, Gill Perry, Mel Ramsden and Kim Woods.
Translations from non‐English sources have been made by Emma Barker and Encarna Trinidad Barrantes, Kathleen Christian, Hugo Miguel Crespo, Richard Dixon, Richard Elliott and Giuliana Paganucci. Chris Miller has been exceptionally helpful in his responses to last‐minute calls for translations from the French.
Among others without whose efforts this book would have been impossible to make are the many members of the production team at Wiley Blackwell in the UK and SPi in India. Jayne Fargnoli never let the project die, even during the long hiatus in its making. Rebecca Harkin was instrumental in reviving the proposal after its hibernation. The book in its actual form could not have been realized without the prolonged and conscientious efforts of Tom Bates, Juliet Booker, Simon Eckley, Dhivya Kannan, Catriona King, Jake Opie, Sundar Parkkavan and Liz Wingett. Diana Newall undertook the online searching of historical sources in the early stages. Andrew McNamara’s assistance in Australia helped enormously. Alex Potts has been supportive throughout in a host of different ways, ranging from the sourcing of texts to critical reading of editorial materials. Felicity Marsh steered the book through the long and complex process of its production during the difficult, demanding circumstances of 2020. Roberta Wood prepared the manuscript and formed a crucial link between the editors and the publisher; Art in Theory: The West in the World would not have been possible without her work.
Paul Wood
Leon Wainwright
A Note on the Presentation and Editing of Texts
Art in Theory: The West in the World has a particular shape. The epigraph to the book says ‘the past is never dead’; nonetheless, the form the book takes respects the widespread contemporary preoccupation with the present. Half of the book is devoted to the twentieth and twenty‐first centuries. Thus the shape of the book involves a deliberate strategy: to insist on connections with the past, even the distant past, over the entire long period with which we are concerned, but also to emphasize the influence of the recent past on artistic and intellectual activity in the present.
When a published document, such as an essay, was originally given a title, this has generally been used for the present publication, in single quotation marks. Titles of books and exhibitions are given in italics. The term ‘from’ preceding a title – usually a book – signifies that we have taken a specific extract or extracts from a longer text without seeking to represent the argument as a whole. As a rule, shorter texts are either reproduced in their entirety or edited to indicate the argument of the whole. Where no suitable original title was available, we have given descriptive headings without quotation marks. The title of the whole work, its date of either composition or, if different, its publication, as well as its previously published source, are given in the introduction to each text. All published sources of anthologized texts are also given in alphabetical order in the bibliography.
It is the aim of this anthology that it be as wide‐ranging as possible. We have therefore preferred the course of including a greater number of texts of which several must appear in abbreviated form, to the course of presenting a small number in their entirety. Texts have been variously edited to shorten them, to eliminate references which cannot be explained in the space available and, where necessary, to preserve the flow of argument.
Anthologies can be dangerous. We are opposed to the practice of making historical authors into the puppets of those who come after them. We are aware of several examples of anthologies where elisions made by modern editors are either very lightly flagged, or even on occasion not acknowledged at all. We feel this damages the credibility of the edited text. While no editing process can ever be wholly disinterested, we have always tried, as far as possible, to let the original author speak in his or her own voice. It has been our practice throughout the Art in Theory series to indicate clearly where, and to what extent, texts have been edited. For this purpose we have used three conventions, consistent with the preceding volumes of Art in Theory. Suspended points ‘…’ are used for short omissions, a few words or a phrase within a sentence, or at most a few sentences. Suspended points within square brackets ‘[…]’ are used to denote longer omissions of several sentences or paragraphs. Asterisks ‘* * *’ denote more substantial omissions extending to several pages or a complete subdivision – such as a chapter or several chapters – of the original text. The only exceptions to this rule have been made for the sake of legibility. Thus, if there is a sequence of cuts and we have felt that a succession of ‘[…]’ would damage the readability of the extract, we have used ‘…’. But these occasions have been kept to a minimum ‘…’.
Authors’ notes have only been included where we judged them necessary to the text as printed. For the most part, they have been silently omitted. We have generally avoided the insertion of editorial notes but have supplied essential references in the introductions to individual texts. We have silently corrected obvious typographical errors and errors of transcription where we have discovered them. In the case of older texts, we have left idiosyncrasies of spelling and style unchanged at our discretion to retain a flavour of the original, but wherever we felt these became a distraction for the modern reader, we have modernized accordingly.
Finally, it should not need saying, but we wish to underline the point that the views expressed in the anthologized texts, present as well as past, should not be taken to represent the views of the editors or the publisher. We have endeavoured to let the authors speak for themselves, and only for themselves.
General Introduction
Art in Theory: The West in the World is an anthology of over 360 documents. Its aim is to represent changing ideas about the art of societies outside Europe (and latterly North America as well) held by Western artists and writers from the beginning of the modern period until the globalized situation of the early twenty‐first century. Many of the documents are anthologized here for the first time, and this is also the first time that some of them have been translated into English. Each text is accompanied by an introduction bringing out its main points and relating them to the overarching concerns of the anthology. We believe it is the first time that such a diverse collection of texts has been attempted. Accordingly, the book may be controversial; we certainly do not expect to please all of the people all of the time. But we believe it will above all be useful to the student and interested general reader trying to respond openly to the far‐reaching changes affecting