Innovations in Digital Research Methods. Группа авторов

Innovations in Digital Research Methods - Группа авторов


Скачать книгу
Procter, R. and Halfpenny, P. (2009a) ‘Supporting frame analysis using text mining’, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on e-Social Science, Cologne, June. Available from http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/52916 (accessed 12 Dec 2014).

       Ananiadou, S., Okazaki, N., Procter, R., Rea, B. and Thomas, J. (2009b) ‘Supporting systematic reviews using text mining’, in P. Halfpenny and R. Procter (eds) Special Issue on e-Social Science, Social Science Computing Review Journal, 27(4): 509–23.

       Arms, W.Y. and Larsen, R.L. (2007) The Future of Scholarly Communication: Building the Infrastructure for Cyberscholarship. Report of a workshop held in Phoenix, Arizona April 17–19. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.102.

       Benkler, Y. and Nissenbaum, H. (2006) ‘Commons-based peer production and virtue’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4): 394–419.

      Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) Conference on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. Berlin, October. Available from http://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration (accessed 12 Dec 2014).

       Birkin, M., Procter, R., Allan, R., Bechhofer, S., Buchan, I., Goble, C., Hudson-Smith, A., Lambert, P., DeRoure, D. and Sinnott, R. (2010) ‘Elements of a computational infrastructure for social simulation’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1925): 3797–3812.

       boyd, D. and Crawford, K. (2012) ‘Critical questions for big data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon’, Information, Communication & Society, 15(5): 662–79.

       Burawoy, M. (2005) ‘For public sociology’, American Sociological Review, 70: 4–28.

       Crabtree, A., French, A., Greenhalgh, C., Benford, S., Cheverst, K., Fitton, D., Rouncefield, M. and Graham, C. (2006) ‘Developing digital records: early experiences of record and replay’, Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15(4): 281–319.

       Das, S., Sismanis, Y., Beyer, K.S., Gemulla, R., Haas, P.J. and McPherson, J. (2010) ‘Ricardo: integrating R and Hadoop’, in Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, New York: ACM. pp. 987–98.

      Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2010) Delivering the UK’s e-Infrastructure for Research. Available from www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/research/esci/e-Infrastructurereviewreport.pdf (accessed 6 Dec 2014).

       De Roure, D., Goble, C., Aleksejevs, S., Bechhofer, S., Bhagat, J., Cruickshank, D., Procter, R. and Poschen, M. (2010) ‘Towards open science: the myExperiment approach’, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 22(17): 2335–53.

       Duncan, G, Elliot, M J. and Salazar, J.J. (2011) Statistical Confidentiality: Principles and Practice. New York: Springer.

       Edwards, P. Jackson, S., Bowker, G. and Knobel, C. (2007) Understanding Infrastructures: Dynamics, Tensions, and Design, final report of the workshop History and Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures, National Science Foundation. Available from http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/49353 (accessed 15 Dec 2014).

       Edwards, P., Mayernik, M.S., Batcheller, A., Bowker, G. and Borgman, C. (2011) ‘Science friction: data, metadata, and collaboration’, Social Studies of Science, 41(5): 667–90.

       Elliott, M. and Scacchi, W. (2008) ‘Mobilization of software developers: the free software movement’, Technology and People, 21(1): 4–33. Available from www.ics.uci.edu/~wscacchi/Papers/New/Elliott-Scacchi-Free-Software-Movement.pdf (assessed 09 April 2015).

       Fraser, M., Hindmarsh, J., Best, K., Heath, C., Biegel, G., Greenhalgh, C. and Reeves, S. (2006) ‘Remote collaboration over video data: towards real-time e-social science’, Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15(4): 257–79.

       Halfpenny, P., Procter, R., Lin, Y. and Voss, A. (2009). ‘Developing the UK e-Social Science Research Programme’. In Jankowski, N. (ed.) e-Research, Transformation in Scholarly Practice, Abingdon: Routledge.

       Halfpenny, P. and Procter, R. (2010) ‘The e-Social Science research agenda’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, special issue on e-Science, 368: 3761–3778, August.

       Hannay, T. (2009) ‘From Web 2.0 to the global database’. In Hey, T., Tansley, S. and Tolle, K. (eds) The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Research. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research. pp. 215–20.

       Hey, T. and Trefethen, A. (2004) ‘UK e-Science programme: next generation grid applications’. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 18(3): 285–91.

       Hey, T., Tansley, S. and Tolle, K. (eds) (2009) The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research.

       Housley, W., Procter, R., Edwards, A., Burnap, P., Williams, M., Sloan, L., Rana, O., Morgan, J., Voss, A. and Greenhill, A. (2014) ‘Big and broad social data and the sociological imagination: a collaborative response’, Big Data & Society, 1(2): pp. 1–15.

       Hudson-Smith, A., Batty, M., Crooks, A. and Milton, R. (2009) ‘Mapping for the masses: accessing Web 2.0 through crowdsourcing’, in P. Halfpenny and R. Procter (eds) Special Issue on e-Social Science, Social Science Computing Review, 27(4): 524–38.

       IDC (2014) The Digital Universe of Opportunities. Executive Summary available at www.emc.com/leadership/digital-universe/2014iview/executive-summary.htm

       Lessig, L. (2004) Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin Press.

       Lewis, P., Newburn, T., Taylor, M., Mcgillivray, C., Greenhill, A., Frayman, H. and Procter, R. (2011) Reading the Riots: Investigating England’s Summer of Disorder. Guardian Newspapers/LSE. Available from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46297/1/Reading%20the%20riots(published).pdf (accessed 09 April 2015).

       Murray-Rust, P. (2008) ‘Chemistry for everyone’, Nature, 451: 648–51.

       O’Reilly, T. (2005) ‘What is Web 2.0?’ September. Available from www.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html (accessed 01 April 2005).

       Olson, G.M., Zimmerman, A. and Bos, N. (2008) Scientific Collaboration on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

       Neylon, C. and Wu, S. (2009) ‘Open Science: tools, approaches, and implications’, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 14: 540–4. Available from http://psb.stanford.edu/psb-online/proceedings/psb09/abstracts/2009_p540.html (accessed 09 April 2015).

       Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A. and Asgari-Targhi, M. (2010a) ‘Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926): 4039–4056.

       Procter, R., Williams, R. and Stewart, J. (2010b) If You Build It, Will They Come?: How Researchers Perceive and Use Web 2.0. Research Information Network. Available at http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/56246/1/WRAP_Procter_If%20you%20build%20it%20will%20they%20come.pdf


Скачать книгу