Innovations in Digital Research Methods. Группа авторов
in Britain, Values, Participation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Preis, T., Moat, H.S., Stanley, H.E., and Bishop, S.R. (2012) ‘Quantifying the advantage of looking forward’, Scientific Reports, 2. Article number: 350. DOI: 10.1038/srep00350
Procter, R., Vis, F. and Voss, A. (2013a) ‘Reading the riots on Twitter: methodological innovation for the analysis of big data’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3): 197–214.
Procter, R., Crump, J., Karstedt, S., Voss, A., and Cantijoch, M. (2013b) ‘Reading the riots: what were the police doing on Twitter?’ Policing and Society, 23(4): 413–36.
Purdam, K., Mackey, E. and Elliot, M. (2004) ‘The regulation of the personal’, Policy Studies, 25(4): 267–82.
RCUK (2009) Policy and Code of Conduct on the Governance of Good Research Conduct. Available from www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/reviews/grc/RCUKPolicyandGuidelinesonGovernanceofGoodResearchPracticeFebruary2013.pdf (accessed 08 Dec 2014).
Rowntree, S. (1902) Poverty: A Study of Town Life. London: Macmillan.
Savage, M. (2009) ‘Contemporary sociology and the challenge of descriptive assemblage’, European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1): 155–174.
Savage, M. and Burrows, R. (2007) ‘The coming crisis of empirical sociology’, Sociology, 41(5): 885–99.
Seal, A. (2006) Correspondence: UK statistical indifference to military casualties in Iraq. The Lancet 367 (9520), 29 April 2006–5 May 2006. pp. 1393–4.
Shakespeare, S. (2013) Shakespeare Review. An Independent Review of Public Sector Information. London: HM Government. Available from www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/198752/13-744-shakespeare-review-of-public-sector-information.pdf (accessed 08 Dec 2014).
Stanley, L. (2008) ‘It has always known and we have always been “other”: knowing capitalism and the “coming crisis” of sociology confront the concentration system and Mass Observation’, Sociological Review, 56(4): 535–51.
Sturgis, P., Read, S., Hatemi, P.K., Zhu, G., Wright, M.J., Martin, N.G. and Trull, T. (2010) ‘A genetic basis for social trust?’ Political Behaviour, 32: 205–30.
Swan, M. (2012) ‘crowdsourced health research studies: an important emerging complement to clinical trials in the public health research ecosystem’, Journal of Medical Internet Research 14(2): e46. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1988 (accessed 08 Dec 2014).
Sweeney, L. (2001) ‘Information explosion’, in P. Doyle, J.I. Lane, J.M. Theeuwes, and L.V. Zayatz (eds), Confidentiality, Disclosure and Data Access: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies. New York: Elsevier Science. pp.43–74.
Twitter (2013) Terms of Service: https://twitter.com/tos. Accessed 2013.
Van Zoonen, L., Vis, F. and Mihelj, S. (2011) ‘YouTube interactions between agonism, antagonism and dialogue: video responses to the anti-Islam film Fitna’, New Media and Society, 13(8): 1284–1300.
Wang, T. (2013) https://twitter.com/TonyW/status/375889809153462272 (accessed 08 Dec 2014).
Whitmarsh, L. (2009) ‘Behavioural responses to climate change: asymmetry of intentions and impacts’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29: 13–23.
Wind-Cowie, M. and Lekhi, R. (2012) The Data Dividend. Demos: London.
2.7 Online Resources80
Big Data Debate British Academy – www.britac.ac.uk/events/2012/The_Big_Data_Debate.cfm
Google Trends – www.google.com/trends
Methods@Manchester – www.methods.manchester.ac.uk
Nesstar – http://nesstar.esds.ac.uk
Oxford e Research Centre – www.oerc.ox.ac.uk
Oxford Internet Institute – www.oii.ox.ac.uk
Radical Statistics – www.radstats.org.uk
Research Methods Centre – www.ncrm.ac.uk
Researching Social Media – http://researchingsocialmedia.org
Social Research Methods – www.socialresearchmethods.net
Survey Network – www.surveynet.ac.uk
Text Mining Centre – www.nactem.ac.uk
UK Data Service – http://ukdataservice.ac.uk
1Booth’s original work was published in 17 volumes over the turn of the nineteenth century. It has been subsequently summarized, reproduced and interpreted on many occasions. See O’Day and Englander (1993).
2Within the UK, see www.adls.ac.uk for general information about new access opportunities.
3At the time of writing, the UK Administrative Data Taskforce had reported (www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/ADT-Improving-Access-for-Research-and-Policy_tcm8-24462.pdf). If its recommendations are taken up by the UK government, they are likely to lead to a step change in research access to administrative data.
4By orthodox social science data, we mean data collected with the specific intent of doing social science. Though, of course, even these data and methods are continually being developed and renewed; we have travelled some distance from the purposive cross-sectional surveys of the early twentieth century in the UK to the online surveys, cohort studies and experimental controlled trials increasingly used today.
5The definition in the SRSA is very similar to the one contained in the Data Protection Act (1998).
6See http://ukanon.net
7The Integrated Household Survey combines data collected from the following surveys: General Lifestyle Survey, Living Costs and Food Survey, Opinions Survey, English Housing Survey, Labour Force Survey/Annual Population Survey, Life Opportunities Survey.
8See www.mappiness.org.uk
9See http://quantifiedself.com/about
10See, for example, Open Street Map: www.openstreetmap.org
11See, for example, https://scraperwiki.com/professional
12See