Restoring with Flowables. Douglas A. Terry
Kirk RE, Othmer DF, Kroschwitz J, Howe-Grant M. Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, ed 4. New York: Wiley, 1991:397.
25. Myshko D. Nanotechnology: It’s a small world. Pharma Voice 2004;34–39.
26. Muselmann M. Composites make large difference in “small” medical, dental applications. Comp Tech 2003:24–27.
27. Estafan AM, Estafari D. Microleakage study of flowable composite resin systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000;21:705–708.
28. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:516–521.
29. Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, et al. Clinical evaluation of 2 flowable composites. Quintessence Int 2006;37:225–231.
30. Dukić W, Dukić OL, Milardović S, Vindakijević Z. Clinical comparison of flowable composite to other fissure sealing materials: A 12 months study. Coll Antropol 2007;31:1019–1024.
31. Baroudi K, Saleh AM, Silikas N, Watts DC. Shrinkage behavior of flowable resin-composites related to conversion and filler-fraction. J Dent 2007; 35:651–655.
32. Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Attar N. Clinical evaluation of flowable resins in non-carious cervical lesions: Two-year results. Oper Dent 2007;32:313–321.
33. Kubo S, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2010;38:191–200.
34. Turner EW, Shook LW, Ross JA, deRijk W, Eason BC. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite in non-carious class V lesions: Two-year results. J Tenn Dent Assoc 2008;88:20–24.
35. Xavier JC, Monteiro GQ, Montes MA. Polymerization shrinkage and flexural modulus of flowable dental composites. Mater Res 2010;13:381–384.
36. Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of two flowable composites. Quintessence Int 2010;41:497–503.
37. Yu B, Lee YK. Differences in color, translucency and fluorescence between flowable and universal resin composites. J Dent 2008;36:840–846.
38. Clelland NL, Pagnotto MP, Kerby RE, Seghi RR. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:153–157.
39. Karaman E, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Clinical evaluation of a nanohybrid and a flowable resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 24-month results. J Adhes Dent 2012; 14:485–492.
40. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater 2011;27:348–355.
41. G-aenial Universal Flo: Editor’s choice. Dent Advisor 2011:19.
42. Sumino N, Tsubota K, Toshiki T, Shiratsuchi K, Miyazaki M, Latta M. Comparison of the wear and flexural characteristics of flowable resin composite for posterior lesions. Act Odontol Scand 2013;71:820–827.
43. Torres CRG, Rêgo HM, Perote LC, et al. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations. J Dent 2014;42:793–799.
44. Zaruba M, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T. Comparison between different flow application techniques: SDR vs flowable composite. J Adhes Dent 2012;15:115–121.
45. Lokhande NA, Padmai AS, Rathore VP, Shingane S, Jayashanker DN, Sharma U. Effectiveness of flowable resin composite in reducing microleakage: An in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2014; 6:111–114.
46. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Heymann HO. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater 1992;8:305–309.
47. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2005;26:4932–4937.
48. Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Condon JR, Adey JD. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2002;18:1–11.
49. Venhoven BMA, de Gee Aj, Werner A, et al. Influence of filler parameters on the mechanical coherence of dental restorative resin composites. Biomaterials 1996;17:735–440.
50. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997;76:1405–1411.
51. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;38:303–313.
52. Beatty MW, Swartz ML, Moore BK, et al. Effect of microfiller fraction and silane treatment on resin composite properties. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:12–23.
53. Cadenaro M, Marchesi G, Antoniolli F, et al. Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction. Dent Mater 2009;25:649–654.
54. Yamase M, Maseki T, Nitta T, et al. Mechanical properties of various latest resin composite restoratives [abstract 464]. J Dent Res 89(special issue A):2010.
55. Yahagi C, Takagaki T, Sadr A, Ikeda M, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Effect of lining with a flowable composite on internal adaptation of direct composite restorations using all-in-one adhesive systems. Dent Mater J 2012;31:481–488.
56. Terry DA, Powers JM. A predictable resin composite injection technique, part I. Dent Today 2014;33(4):96,98–101.
57. Terry DA. Developing a functional composite resin provisional. Am J Esthet Dent 2012;2:56–65.
58. Terry DA. What other restorative material has so many uses: Flowables. Int Dent (African Ed) 2012; 3:42–58.
59. Terry DA, Powers JM. A predictable resin composite injection technique, part II. Dent Today 2014;33(6):80,82,84,85.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив