The Production of Lateness. Rahel Rivera Godoy-Benesch
of their authors as artists, of old age) happens within two overwhelmingly powerful normative discourses against which the late works posit themselves: on the one hand, the late-style debate in art historyart history, musicologymusic and literary criticism, which functions as an imposition and a value judgment of late art, and consequently of the elderly artist’s abilities; on the other, the socialsocial discourse and politicalpolitical discourse discourses of ageing, which arise from the fear of the expected demographicdemography changes, shape the cultural landscape, and press ever more demands to which the elderly should respond. Chapter 2 will lay the theoretical groundwork, outlining the tenets of late-style theory and providing an overview of existing approaches to old-age art. It will be argued that late style in contemporary literature is neither a natural, biographical effect of old age nor solely a construct that has been imposed on the works of art by critics. Rather, ageing authors living and writing in the second half of the twentieth century and the early twenty-first century feel compelled to address late style in their works and to develop a lateness of their own because their works are threatened to be devalueddevaluation within the existing late-style discourse. Special attention will be devoted to Theodor W. Adorno’sAdorno, Theodor W. work on Beethoven’sBeethoven, Ludwig van late phaselate phase: although Adorno’s professed aim was a strictly formal, non-biographical assessment of late style, it will be shown that his writing actually gave rise to a distinct image of the elderly artist. Finally, a method of reading late style as a code of production will be proposed, which shall allow the integration of authorial self-presentation, textual self-referentiality, and generic form into the analysis of late literary works.
Chapter 3 will examine the way in which John BarthBarth, John’s The Development (2008) highlights issues of late-life creativity through a network of interrelated short stories. The strongly metafictionalmetafiction narratives not only blur and undermine the borderline between art and life but also countercounter-discourse seemingly fixed generic notions of the artist novel. On the basis of the claim that late works make reference to earlier texts by the same author (Zanetti 321; Taberner 195), Lost in the Funhouse, a postmodern KünstlerromanKünstlerroman John Barth published forty years earlier, is used as a counter-narrative to compare the young and the old artist types. Barth, by modifying some of the statements about the role of the author and the processes of creative production and by providing the elderly artist-protagonist with autobiographical features, stages himself as a late stylist. What will thus be at the center of Chapter 3 is the complex interplay between the two works and the way in which the rigid generic structure of the Künstlerroman affects the production of a late-style narrative. A further topic covered in this chapter is the structural irony that arises from the distance between the semi-autobiographical artist-protagonist and his author. The text thus becomes a stage for a power game in which the author affirms his agencyagency by manipulating his protagonists and arguably also controllingcontrol his readers.
The observations made in regard to John Barth’s The Development, especially those related to genregenre, can to a certain extent be considered valid for similar late-style narratives, but only for the male type. In Chapter 4, its femalegender counterpart will therefore be at the center of attention, with Karen Blixen’sBlixen, Karen short stories “Echoes” (1957) and “The Dreamers” (1934) featuring as female late-style narrative and KünstlerromanKünstlerroman, respectively.1 Blixen wrote “Echoes” a few years before her death and for this purpose resurrected the autobiographical character Pellegrina Leoni (an opera singer who had died in “The Dreamers”), turning the formerly young and radiant diva into an elderly woman. Blixen thus revises her former decision to provide closureclosure through the protagonist’s death and, by taking a clearly feminist stance, raises questions about gender in late artistic production. In addition, due to the two narratives’ incompatible sets of information and their distorted chronology, an intricate web of meanings opens up between the two texts. As will be proposed, “Echoes” thereby projects the interpretation of the late work onto a historicalhistory plane outside the fictional text; it affirms the importance of art as part of life.
Chapter 5 attempts a crossover, as it examines Joan Didion’sDidion, Joan old-age autobiography. Paying close attention to the differences between fiction and autobiographyautobiography, the chapter argues that autobiographical narratives may be used to make even more visible what is at stake for elderly authors when they seek stylistic innovation. By comparing and contrasting Didion’s last two works, Blue Nights (2011) and The Year of Magical Thinking (2005), and further taking into account one much earlier text written by this icon of New Journalism, the analysis reveals how the elderly Didion attempts to unmaskmask herself and create a more realistic view of old-age creativity than ever before. In Blue Nights, it will be argued, Didion also questions those branches of Western philosophyphilosophy that view human life as an accumulation of experiencehuman experience, knowledge and wisdomwisdom. Furthermore, by foregrounding her own erratic writing process, Didion undermines traditional views of art and the masterful artist, suggesting that the finalized work may not be so important after all. She thereby shifts the focus from the audience and the critics, who enjoy art, to the artist, who uses it as a life-saving routineroutine. Being an important public figure, Didion thereby risks losing the support of her audience, who has become accustomed to her former signature style, and indeed, not all of the reactionsreception to her swan song have been positive (cf. Cusk). This further underscores the precarious status of the ageing artist. Above all (and this may also be a reason for some of the negative reviews), Didion’s Blue Nights conveys an image of radical honesty with regard to old age and late-life creativity, one which includes declinedecline, frailtyfrailty, and fear as a substantial part of the human conditionhuman condition.
Chapter 6, in examining the socialsocial discourse and politicalpolitical discourse conditions in which ageing artists and their texts are embedded, functions as a conclusion. As Linda and Michael HutcheonHutcheon, MichaelHutcheon, Linda assert, “[t]he internalization of societal attitudes toward aging presents challenges to artists, as it does to everyone who ages” (“Late Style(s)” 7). These challenges are outlined, and the results of the three previous chapters are related to both late-life creativity discourses and philosophicalphilosophy approaches to old age. Over the last decade, and as a result of the baby boomerbaby boomers generation growing old, issues relating to old age have shown an increasing presence in the public discourses, creating an atmosphere of ageismageism and pressure. Late-style theory and literary analysis have, to a certain extent, been complicit in this development. Thus, the chapter will conclude by suggesting a direction literary analysis could take in order to pursue an ethicalethics, non-ageist practice in its investigation of old age and late-life creativity.
2 Late Style through the Ages: From Criticism to Creative Practice
How, then, can we generalize about late style or elderly artists in a meaningful way? And more importantly, why bother?
(Hutcheon and Hutcheon, “Historicizing Late Style” 58)
2.1 Late Stylelate style or Old-Age Styleold-age style?
Indeed, why should we ‘bother’ to write about late style? Why should we discuss it and argue about it? Why define what it entails; why even use it as a simple label for ageing artists’ works? With these questions, the probably most famous literary quote about labelling comes to mind, a passage from Shakespeare’sShakespeare, William Romeo and Juliet: “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose / By any other name would smell as sweet” (2.2.1–2). This is what Juliet argues when she justifies her fondness for Romeo, who belongs to the wrong aristocratic family. Yet, Juliet’s attempt to diminish the importance of names is driven by passion. The critic’s work, however, should be stripped of emotion. Hence, any discussion of old age art must begin with a sober examination of its “names,” the terms that denote the phenomenon. Is it ‘late style,’ ‘old-age style,’ or just ‘latenesslateness’ that we believe to spot in works that were written, painted, or composed at a late stage in an artist’s career? Juliet would not mind the name as long as the ‘product’ satisfied her taste, and, likewise, critics could be tempted to laud late art without careful examination. But can there really be a ‘product’