Healing Death. Christopher Levan

Healing Death - Christopher Levan


Скачать книгу

      Then there is pain—perhaps the most important factor in the current debate. We all fear the end, because of the agony it might entail. No one should have to suffer unduly, and public sympathy is clearly opposed to prolonging a person’s anguish. How often have we told ourselves that our society condones putting dogs, cats, horses, our loved animals, to sleep rather than have them suffer? Our compassion says it’s “the right thing to do.” Indeed, it was because of the unrelenting suffering of several people, notably Sue Rodriguez and Lee Carter, that we have the legislation on medical assistance in dying. It was their pain that propelled their cases all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.

      While many people approach their end with relatively little discomfort, those who suffer will tell you of how it distorts everything. This we fear more than anything else: the lingering torture of a vicious cancer, as it eases its way through vital organs, the bone-on-bone grinding of degenerative arthritis, the mental anguish of seeing your body become more and more immobilized, while your mind is still vital and awake, the desperate grasping for every breath as one slowly suffocates, the loss of bodily functions. Everyone can imagine the horrors of a painful ending. And we fear it.

      Death Is Not the Enemy

      It was from Ethel and many others that I began to understand that dying, an essential part of living, might also be a healing moment. And that fact raised many pastoral questions that became the guiding ideas of my research and writing. They are: If dying is neither an exceptional event nor the enemy of living but a part of life, how can we shape our encounter with death so that it becomes a welcome, meaningful end? Since death is clearly part of what it means to be human, shall we not apply as much calm intentionality to dying as we do to living? Is it not possible to walk through our dying in such a way that we have been healed?

      In the end, the guiding thesis of this text became a simple affirmation. We can place the words “healing” and “death” together in the same sentence, for it is possible that, in our ending, we can experience a wholeness and completion which is quite restorative.

      A simple example at this point will suffice to illustrate how we will explore death as a form of healing. How often have I stood at the graveside, saying good-bye to a beloved father or mother, and there in the circle of mourners is a space where the youngest son or the oldest daughter should be standing. They weren’t welcome. No one wants to talk about it, for fear of “upsetting” the ceremony, but there’s an open wound that needs addressing. And while it is not within my ability to heal it during the funeral itself, it is a pity that, in the time leading up to a parent’s death, we lacked the rituals or traditions which might have allowed for the reconciliation of this broken relationship. We don’t have the tradition or the means of acknowledging and forgiving our missteps and mistakes! Surely, at our end, this is one of our chief desires and tasks. Death wins, when we allow it to rob us of the chance to be reunited with the very precious, but broken, bits and pieces of our life.

      In the past, the possibility of finding healing in our dying was confounded by the uncertainty surrounding the event. No one knows when it will happen, at least not with anything like precision. So, we let it slide. The young son will come home eventually. No need to push it or presume. That older daughter will come when “it’s time.” And planning a healthy, wholesome ending to our life feels either like capitulation to fatalism or a macabre self-absorption. Those who are dying don’t want to call attention to themselves, and those who are in the dying person’s circle don’t want to plan anything, lest they look like they are prematurely pushing the dying person into their grave.


Скачать книгу