The Lancashire Witches (Historical Novel). William Harrison Ainsworth
were regarded by the people with abhorrence, and disposed them to aid the sufferers in resistance. As yet the wealthier monasteries in the north had been spared, and it was to preserve them from the greedy hands of the visiters, Doctors Lee and Layton, that the insurrection had been undertaken. A simultaneous rising took place in Lincolnshire, headed by Makarel, Abbot of Barlings, but it was speedily quelled by the vigour and skill of the Duke of Suffolk, and its leader executed. But the northern outbreak was better organized, and of greater force, for it now numbered thirty thousand men, under the command of a skilful and resolute leader named Robert Aske.
As may be supposed, the priesthood were main movers in a revolt having their especial benefit for its aim; and many of them, following the example of the Abbot of Barlings, clothed themselves in steel instead of woollen garments, and girded on the sword and the breastplate for the redress of their grievances and the maintenance of their rights. Amongst these were the Abbots of Jervaux, Furness, Fountains, Rivaulx, and Salley, and, lastly, the Abbot of Whalley, before mentioned; a fiery and energetic prelate, who had ever been constant and determined in his opposition to the aggressive measures of the king. Such was the Pilgrimage of Grace, such its design, and such its supporters.
Several large towns had already fallen into the hands of the insurgents. York, Hull, and Pontefract had yielded; Skipton Castle was besieged, and defended by the Earl of Cumberland; and battle was offered to the Duke of Norfolk and the Earl of Shrewsbury, who headed the king’s forces at Doncaster. But the object of the Royalist leaders was to temporise, and an armistice was offered to the rebels and accepted. Terms were next proposed and debated.
During the continuance of this armistice all hostilities ceased; but beacons were reared upon the mountains, and their fires were to be taken as a new summons to arms. This signal the eight watchers expected.
Though late in November, the day had been unusually fine, and, in consequence, the whole hilly ranges around were clearly discernible, but now the shades of evening were fast drawing on.
“Night is approaching,” cried the tall man in the velvet mantle, impatiently; “and still the signal comes not. Wherefore this delay? Can Norfolk have accepted our conditions? Impossible. The last messenger from our camp at Scawsby Lees brought word that the duke’s sole terms would be the king’s pardon to the whole insurgent army, provided they at once dispersed—except ten persons, six named and four unnamed.”
“And were you amongst those named, lord abbot?” demanded one of the monks.
“John Paslew, Abbot of Whalley, it was said, headed the list,” replied the other, with a bitter smile. “Next came William Trafford, Abbot of Salley. Next Adam Sudbury, Abbot of Jervaux. Then our leader, Robert Aske. Then John Eastgate, Monk of Whalley—”
“How, lord abbot!” exclaimed the monk. “Was my name mentioned?”
“It was,” rejoined the abbot. “And that of William Haydocke, also Monk of Whalley, closed the list.”
“The unrelenting tyrant!” muttered the other monk. “But these terms could not be accepted?”
“Assuredly not,” replied Paslew; “they were rejected with scorn. But the negotiations were continued by Sir Ralph Ellerker and Sir Robert Bowas, who were to claim on our part a free pardon for all; the establishment of a Parliament and courts of justice at York; the restoration of the Princess Mary to the succession; the Pope to his jurisdiction; and our brethren to their houses. But such conditions will never be granted. With my consent no armistice should have been agreed to. We are sure to lose by the delay. But I was overruled by the Archbishop of York and the Lord Darcy. Their voices prevailed against the Abbot of Whalley—or, if it please you, the Earl of Poverty.”
“It is the assumption of that derisive title which has drawn upon you the full force of the king’s resentment, lord abbot,” observed Father Eastgate.
“It may be,” replied the abbot. “I took it in mockery of Cromwell and the ecclesiastical commissioners, and I rejoice that they have felt the sting. The Abbot of Barlings called himself Captain Cobbler, because, as he affirmed, the state wanted mending like old shoon. And is not my title equally well chosen? Is not the Church smitten with poverty? Have not ten thousand of our brethren been driven from their homes to beg or to starve? Have not the houseless poor, whom we fed at our gates, and lodged within our wards, gone away hungry and without rest? Have not the sick, whom we would have relieved, died untended by the hedge-side? I am the head of the poor in Lancashire, the redresser of their grievances, and therefore I style myself Earl of Poverty. Have I not done well?”
“You have, lord abbot,” replied Father Eastgate.
“Poverty will not alone be the fate of the Church, but of the whole realm, if the rapacious designs of the monarch and his heretical counsellors are carried forth,” pursued the abbot. “Cromwell, Audeley, and Rich, have wisely ordained that no infant shall be baptised without tribute to the king; that no man who owns not above twenty pounds a year shall consume wheaten bread, or eat the flesh of fowl or swine without tribute; and that all ploughed land shall pay tribute likewise. Thus the Church is to be beggared, the poor plundered, and all men burthened, to fatten the king, and fill his exchequer.”
“This must be a jest,” observed Father Haydocke.
“It is a jest no man laughs at,” rejoined the abbot, sternly; “any more than the king’s counsellors will laugh at the Earl of Poverty, whose title they themselves have created. But wherefore comes not the signal? Can aught have gone wrong? I will not think it. The whole country, from the Tweed to the Humber, and from the Lune to the Mersey, is ours; and, if we but hold together, our cause must prevail.”
“Yet we have many and powerful enemies,” observed Father Eastgate; “and the king, it is said, hath sworn never to make terms with us. Tidings were brought to the abbey this morning, that the Earl of Derby is assembling forces at Preston, to march upon us.”
“We will give him a warm reception if he comes,” replied Paslew, fiercely. “He will find that our walls have not been kernelled and embattled by licence of good King Edward the Third for nothing; and that our brethren can fight as well as their predecessors fought in the time of Abbot Holden, when they took tithe by force from Sir Christopher Parsons of Slaydburn. The abbey is strong, and right well defended, and we need not fear a surprise. But it grows dark fast, and yet no signal comes.”
“Perchance the waters of the Don have again risen, so as to prevent the army from fording the stream,” observed Father Haydocke; “or it may be that some disaster hath befallen our leader.”
“Nay, I will not believe the latter,” said the abbot; “Robert Aske is chosen by Heaven to be our deliverer. It has been prophesied that a ‘worm with one eye’ shall work the redemption of the fallen faith, and you know that Robert Aske hath been deprived of his left orb by an arrow.”
“Therefore it is,” observed Father Eastgate, “that the Pilgrims of Grace chant the following ditty:—
“‘Forth shall come an Aske with one eye,
He shall be chief of the company—
Chief of the northern chivalry.’”
“What more?” demanded the abbot, seeing that the monk appeared to hesitate.
“Nay, I know not whether the rest of the rhymes may please you, lord abbot,” replied Father Eastgate.
“Let me hear them, and I will judge,” said Paslew. Thus urged, the monk went on:—
“‘One shall sit at a solemn feast,
Half warrior, half priest,
The greatest there shall be the least.’”
“The last verse,” observed the monk, “has been added to the ditty by Nicholas Demdike. I heard him sing it the other day at the abbey gate.”
“What, Nicholas Demdike of Worston?” cried the abbot; “he whose wife is a witch?”
“The same,” replied Eastgate.
“Hoo