Elements of Debating. Leverett S. Lyon

      Published by Good Press, 2019

       [email protected]

      EAN 4057664586315

Table of Contents

       PREFACE

       LESSON I

       WHAT ARGUMENTATION IS

       LESSON II

       WHAT DEBATE IS

       LESSON III

       THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUCCESSFUL DEBATING

       LESSON IV

       DETERMINING THE ISSUES

       LESSON V

       HOW TO PROVE THE ISSUES

       LESSON VI

       LESSON VII

       THE FORENSIC

       LESSON VIII

       REFUTATION

       LESSON IX

       MANAGEMENT OF THE DEBATE

       LESSON X

       A SUMMARY AND A DIAGRAM

       APPENDICES

       APPENDIX I

       HOW AND WHERE TO READ FOR MORE INFORMATION

       APPENDIX II

       ILLUSTRATIONS OF ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE THE ISSUES OF THE QUESTION

       APPENDIX III

       A TYPICAL COLLEGE FORENSIC

       APPENDIX IV

       MATERIAL FOR BRIEFING

       REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT

       APPENDIX V

       QUESTIONS WITH SUGGESTED ISSUES AND BRIEF BIBLIOGRAPHY

       APPENDIX VI

       A LIST OF DEBATABLE PROPOSITIONS

       APPENDIX VII

       FORMS FOR JUDGES' DECISION

PREFACE

       Table of Contents

      This book pretends but little to originality in material. Its aim is to offer the old in a form that shall meet the needs of young students who are beginning work in debate. The effort has been made only to present the elements of forensic work so freed from technicality that they may be apparent to the student with the greatest possible economy of time and the least possible interpretation by the teacher.

      It is hoped that the book may serve not only those schools where debating is a part of the regular course, but also those institutions where it is a supplement to the work in English or is encouraged as a "super-curriculum" activity.

      Although the general obligation to other writers is obvious, there is no specific indebtedness not elsewhere acknowledged, except to Mr. Arthur Edward Phillips, whose vital principle of "Reference to Experience" has, in a modified form, been made the test for evidence. It is my belief that the use of this principle, rather than the logical and technical forms of proof and evidence, will make the training of debate far more applicable in other forms of public speaking. My special thanks are due to Miss Charlotte Van Der Veen and Miss Elizabeth Barns, whose aid has added technical exactness to almost every page. I wish to thank also Miss Bella Hopper for suggestions in preparing the reference list of Appendix I. Most of all, I am indebted to the students whose interest has been a constant stimulus, and whose needs have been to me, as they are to all who teach, the one sure and constant guide.

      L.S.L.

LESSON I

       Table of Contents

WHAT ARGUMENTATION IS

       Table of Contents

      When we pause to look about us and