John Lackland. Kate Norgate
pp. 161–5.
[29] Eyton, Itin. of Henry II. p. 210, from Pipe Roll 1177.
[30] Ib. p. 222, from Pipe Roll 1178.
[31] R. Torigni, a. 1178.
[32] Gesta Hen. vol. i. p. 221.
[33] Eyton, Itin. Hen. II. p. 226, from Pipe Roll 1179.
[34] Foedera, vol. i. pt. i. p. 40. For date see Eyton, p. 246.
[35] Gesta Hen. vol. i. pp. 304, 305.
[36] Ib. pp. 304, 305, 307, 308.
[37] Gesta Hen. vol. i. p. 308.
[38] R. Diceto, vol. ii. p. 21.
[39] Gesta Hen. vol. i. p. 311.
[40] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 200.
[41] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. pp. 199, 200.
[42] Gesta Hen. vol. i. p. 319.
[43] R. Howden, vol. ii. p. 288.
[44] Gesta Hen. vol. i. pp. 320, 321.
[46] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. pp. 362, 363.
[47] Gesta Hen. vol. i. p. 336; R. Diceto, vol. ii. p. 34.
[48] Treaty in Gesta Hen. vol. i. pp. 102, 103.
[49] Charter in Lyttelton, Henry II. (ed. 1767), vol. iv. p. 295; Song of Dermot (ed. Orpen), vv. 2725–32; cf. Rot. Chart. p. 178. The statement in Gesta Hen. vol. i. p. 163 (copied by R. Howden, vol. ii. p. 134) that the service was that of a hundred knights is clearly a mistake.
[50] Song of Dermot, vv. 2617–22.
[51] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 298.
[52] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 277.
[54] Ib. pp. 321–3. Cf. Song of Dermot, vv. 3370 to end.
[55] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. pp. 332, 333.
[58] Song of Dermot, vv. 2733–5.
[59] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 339; Gesta Hen. vol. i. pp. 137, 138. Cf. Four Masters and Ann. Loch Cé, a. 1177.
[60] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 346. Cf. Four Masters and Ann. Loch Cé, a. 1177.
[61] Cf. Gesta Hen. vol. i. p. 161 with Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 347.
[62] Defined as extending “towards the Cape of S. Brendan [Knock Brandon] on the sea-coast, and towards Limerick and other parts, and as far as the water near Lismore.” Ware’s Antiquities of Ireland, ed. Harris, p. 194.
[63] Gesta Hen. vol. i. pp. 162–5.
[64] Cf. Gesta Hen. vol. i. pp. 172, 173; Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 347, with Mr. Dimock’s note 6; and Rot. Chart. p. 84 b.
[65] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 348. The removal of William Fitz-Audeline from the office of viceroy seems to have involved the displacement of the subordinate officers appointed by him, of whom Richard of London was one.
[66] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 348. Cf. Ware, Antiq. pp. 194, 195.
[67] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 349.
[68] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 350. Cf. note (e) to Four Masters, a. 1182, and Ann. Loch Cé, a. 1182.
[69] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. pp. 350, 351.
[70] Dic. Nat. Biog. s.v. “Fitz-Stephen, Robert.”
[71] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. p. 350.
[72] Ware, Antiq. pp. 196, 197.
[73] Cf. Gir. Cambr. vol. v. pp. 353–6, and Gesta Hen. vol. i. p. 270.
[74] Gir. Cambr. vol. v. pp. 357, 358. Cf. Gesta Hen. l.c., where the date is wrong.