Comenius and the Beginnings of Educational Reform. W. S. Monroe
tion>
W. S. Monroe
Comenius and the Beginnings of Educational Reform
Published by Good Press, 2019
EAN 4064066123000
Table of Contents
CHAPTER I EUROPEAN EDUCATION IN THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY
CHAPTER II FORERUNNERS OF COMENIUS
Campanella, Andreæ, and Bateus
CHAPTER III BOYHOOD AND EARLY LIFE OF COMENIUS: 1592–1628
CHAPTER IV CAREER AS AN EDUCATIONAL REFORMER: 1628–1656
CHAPTER V CLOSING YEARS: 1656–1670
CHAPTER VI PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
Types of Educational Institutions
CHAPTER VII EARLIEST EDUCATION OF THE CHILD
CHAPTER VIII STUDY OF LANGUAGE
CHAPTER IX INFLUENCE OF COMENIUS ON MODERN EDUCATORS
CHAPTER X PERMANENT INFLUENCE OF COMENIUS
COMENIUS
CHAPTER I
EUROPEAN EDUCATION IN THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY
Humanism, realism, and naturalism characterized—Devotion of the sixteenth century to the humanistic ideal—Study of Latin eloquence—Style the chief aim—Neglect of the mother-tongue—Views of John Sturm and the Jesuits—Devotion to Cicero—Decadence of the later humanists—Erasmus and Melanchthon on the enrichment of the course of study—Satires of Rabelais directed against the humanists—Protests of Montaigne—Attitude of Ascham and Mulcaster—Transition from humanism to realism.
“Education in Europe,” says Oscar Browning,1 “has passed through three phases, which may conveniently be called humanism, realism, and naturalism. The first is grounded upon the study of language, and especially of the two dead languages, Greek and Latin. The second is based upon the study of things instead of words, the education of the mind through the eye and the hand. Closely connected with this is the study of those things which may be of direct influence upon and direct importance to life. The third is not in the first instance study at all. It is an attempt to build up the whole nature of man—to educate first his body, then his character, and lastly his mind.”
The sixteenth century was wedded to the humanistic ideal of education. Without regard for the diversity of avocations, classical culture was held to be the safest and best training for the manifold duties of life. Aristotle’s Politics was considered the wisest utterance on the direction of affairs of state; Cæsar’s Commentaries the safest guides to military eminence; the practical Stoicism of the Latin authors the most infallible basis for ethics and the regulation of conduct; and as for agriculture, had not Virgil written a treatise on that subject? It was clear in the minds of the sixteenth-century humanists that classical culture furnished the best preparation, alike for theologians and artisans.
To