Heterogeneous Catalysts. Группа авторов

Heterogeneous Catalysts - Группа авторов


Скачать книгу
Soorholtz, M., Jones, L.C., Samuelis, D. et al. (2016). ACS Catal. 6: 2332–2340.

      31 31 Jens, A., Sabrina, M., and Regina, P. (2015). ChemSusChem 8: 672–679.

      32 32 Bavykina, A.V., Rozhko, E., Goesten, M.G. et al. (2016). ChemCatChem 8: 2217–2221.

      33 33 Kamiya, K., Kamai, R., Hashimoto, K., and Nakanishi, S. (2014). Nat. Commun. 5: 5040.

      34 34 Yamaguchi, S., Kamiya, K., Hashimoto, K., and Nakanishi, S. (2017). Chem. Commun. 53: 10437–10440.

      35 35 Ryo, K., Kazuhide, K., Kazuhito, H., and Shuji, N. (2016). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55: 13184–13188.

      36 36 Titirici, M.‐M. and Antonietti, M. (2010). Chem. Soc. Rev. 39: 103–116.

      37 37 Makowski, P., Demir Cakan, R., Antonietti, M. et al. (2008). Chem. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1039/B717928F.

      38 38 Titirici, M.‐M., Antonietti, M., and Thomas, A. (2006). Chem. Mater. 18: 3808–3812.

      39 39 Xiong, H., Pham, H.N., and Datye, A.K. (2013). J. Catal. 302: 93–100.

      40 40 Graham, U.M., Jacobs, G., Gnanamani, M.K. et al. (2014). ACS Catal. 4: 1662–1672.

      41 41 den Breejen, J.P., Sietsma, J.R.A., Friedrich, H. et al. (2010). J. Catal. 270: 146–152.

      42 42 Casavola, M., Hermannsdörfer, J., de Jonge, N. et al. (2015). Adv. Funct. Mater. 25: 5309–5319.

      43 43 Arrigo, R., Schuster, M.E., Xie, Z. et al. (2015). ACS Catal. 5: 2740–2753.

      44 44 Pylypenko, S., Borisevich, A., More, K.L. et al. (2013). Energy Environ. Sci. 6: 2957–2964.

      45 45 Vriamont, C., Haynes, T., McCague‐Murphy, E. et al. (2015). J. Catal. 329: 389–400.

      46 46 Sun, S., Zhang, G., Gauquelin, N. et al. (2013). Sci. Rep. 3: 1775.

      47 47 Xiao, M., Zhu, J., Ma, L. et al. (2018). ACS Catal. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b00138.

      48 48 Lin, Y., Watson, K.A., Ghose, S. et al. (2009). J. Phys. Chem. C 113: 14858–14862.

      49 49 Deng, D., Chen, X., Yu, L. et al. (2015). Sci. Adv. 1 (11): e1500462.

      50 50 Casaban, J., Hardacre, C., James, S.L., and Lagunas, M.C. (2012). Green Chem. 14: 1643–1648.

      51 51 Konda, S.K., Amiri, M., and Chen, A. (2016). J. Phys. Chem. C 120: 14467–14473.

      52 52 Almkhelfe, H., Li, X., Thapa, P. et al. (2018). J. Catal. 361: 278–289.

       Vladimir B. Golovko

       School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

      A vast majority (∼85–90%) of synthesis processes used by chemical industry involve catalysts, with solid or heterogeneous catalysts utilized in up to ∼80–85% of catalytic processes [1]. One of the major advantages of heterogeneous catalysts is the ease of catalyst recovery, recycling, and, ultimately, the possibility of continuous flow through operation of reactors. Metal‐based catalysts employed by industry typically contain metal nanoparticles (NPs) dispersed on various supports. The prefix “nano‐” (from Greek “dwarf”) stands for 10−9; thus, NPs have sizes measured in nanometers or 10−9 m. As Professor Ertl aptly pointed in his 2007 Nobel Prize in Chemistry talk, “In fact catalysis has been a nanotechnology long before this term was introduced”. The atomic efficiency of metal utilization is vastly improved by dividing metal into NPs, which have extremely high surface‐to‐volume ratios (minimizing amount of metal buried inside particles), resulting in the high proportion of atoms at, or very close to, the surface (where catalytic action takes place). However, industrially used large‐scale and cost‐efficient catalyst fabrication methods typically do not allow solid catalysts to be made with precisely defined active sites. A range of particle sizes is typically present in materials made using industrial approaches such as coprecipitation. This makes it hard to reliably establish structure–property relationships with respect to the activity and selectivity of the catalysts. Classical surface science research studies using ideally flat surfaces of macroscopic metal crystals were important for developing methodologies for studying solid catalysts, as well as for understanding mechanisms of reactions on such surfaces. However, such studies are intrinsically limited when it comes to grasping effects arising due to the nanosize of a catalytically active particle and effects of its interaction with support. This chapter will introduce the advanced fabrication of model heterogeneous catalysts using atomically precise metal clusters as precursors for well‐defined active sites.

      Clusters – what are these species? The term cluster is used over a huge range of sizes – from a cluster of stars, “a group of stars that are gravitationally bound for some length of time,” to a metal cluster, a particle containing specific number of metal atoms chemically bound to each other. In principle, metal‐containing chemical clusters can have wider range of compositions and can include other elements, such as sulfur (metal‐sulfide clusters) or oxygen (metal oxide clusters), within the core; yet, this chapter will focus on pure metal clusters.

Illustration of building up of the band in the bulk metal starting from an individual atom highlighting size sensitivity of electron energy levels in clusters and showing the upper limit of cluster sizes corresponding to size at which transition from semiconducting to metallic behavior occurs. Blue color highlights occupied by electron(s) orbitals. (See online version for color figure).
Скачать книгу