Honey Bee Medicine for the Veterinary Practitioner. Группа авторов

Honey Bee Medicine for the Veterinary Practitioner - Группа авторов


Скачать книгу
of the most remarkable features in our domesticated races is that we see in them adaptation, not indeed to the animal's or plant's own good, but to man's use or fancy. Some variations have probably arisen suddenly, or by one step. However, we cannot suppose that all the breeds were suddenly produced as perfect and useful as we now see them… . The key is man's power of accumulative selection: Nature gives successive variations: man adds then up in certain directions useful to him.

      (Darwin 1868)

      Among the honey bee traits that are known to have a genetic basis, resistance to disease has shown to be a strong component of colony fitness (Tarpy and Seeley 2006). With this in mind, we believe that both the beekeeper and the bee doctor will be wise to consider the following items when it comes to managing the genetics of honey bees.

      Goal 1: Select Locally Adapted, Survivor Stock

      A wonderful example of the adaptation of honey bees to their locale is the ecotype of A. mellifera that lives in the Landes heathlands of southwestern France (Louveaux 1973). The Landes bees have evolved to have a brood cycle with an unusual, second peak of brood production in August, just in time for the bloom of ling heather (Calluna vulgaris) in the Landes landscape. It is interesting to note that when Louveaux moved Paris honey bees to Landes, the Paris bees kept ahead (in colony weight gain, pollen collection, and brood production) of the Landes bees until the middle of July. Up to that point, the Landes bees had trailed behind the Paris bees because the Paris bees had reared more brood in May and June. In August, however, all the colonies of the Landes bees had a second burst of young bees emerging shortly before the heather bloom and by the end of summer these colonies had collected an astonishing 14 kg more honey than the colonies of Paris bees (Louveaux 1973).

Photo depicts bait hives that are small nest boxes that are filled with empty comb and sometimes lures or attractants.

      Goal 2: Promote Drone Comb Building and Drone Mating in Congregation Areas

      Modern apiarists work to limit the amount of drone comb produced by honey bees because beekeepers have learned that by preventing their colonies from producing drones, they can increase honey production (Seeley 2002). Furthermore, drone comb is the preferred site for Varroa reproduction. Limiting it, however, partially “castrates” a colony by reducing the ability of a colony to contribute to the population of drones in a region, an important driver of honey bee diversity and fitness (Seeley 2017b). It is now known that a colony's health and productivity is enhanced by its having high genetic diversity among its worker bees, which arises from the multiple mating (polyandry) strategy of queen honey bees (Tarpy and Seeley 2006; Seeley and Tarpy 2007; Mattila and Seeley 2007). On average, a queen honey bee mates with, and acquires sperm from 10 to 20 drones. Inhibiting drone production in colonies hinders the maintenance of genetic diversity within a region, including the genes that may hold resistance to mites (Rosenkranz et al. 2010).

      Goal 3: Cull Failing Colonies Before Collapse

      Some veterinarians with experience in honey bee disease and/or epidemiology have campaigned against the emergence of Treatment‐Free Beekeeping or Natural Beekeeping because of the risk of spreading disease through the collapse of colonies. Perhaps most alarming is the phenomenon of “mite bomb” colonies (ones collapsing from high mite loads) that spread mites and virulent strains of the Deformed Wing Virus to neighboring colonies (Martin et al. 2012). When Varroa mites reached Hawaii, Martin and colleagues observed a drastic increase in the prevalence of DWV from 10% to 100% (the percentage of honey bee colonies infected with DWV virus), a millionfold increase in DWV viral copies in infected bees, and a reduction in DWV diversity to a single highly contagious strain. A collapse of 274 of 419 managed colonies on Oahu Island followed. The beekeeper should either treat Varroa‐infested colonies once a critical mite infestation level is reached (typically c. three mites per hundred bees sampled) or cull (euthanize) highly infested colonies before they can spread their mites to neighboring colonies or surrounding apiaries.

      Goal 4: Select Quality Queens and Let the Bees Requeen!

      A vigorously laying queen is the most efficient promoter of good genes, so it is of utmost importance to keep colonies headed by highly fertile queens. If a hive must be requeened, it is better to allow the bees to choose their new queen (if age‐appropriate larvae are present) than to replace her artificially since it has been shown that when bees are confronted with an emergency need for queen rearing, they do not select larvae at random for their queen cells (as a beekeeper might), but instead select larvae of certain patrilines (Moritz et al. 2005). In the future, beekeepers and bee doctors may be able to better assess queen quality through quantitative means; queen quality, judged in terms of body weight, is a good predictor of a queen's mating flight number, ovarian size, and overall mating success (Amiri et al. 2017).

      Promoting Good Lifestyle

      The ways in which honey bee colonies live in the wild differ substantially from those experienced by colonies living in apiaries, where they are managed by beekeepers for honey production or crop pollination. Although there is debate about whether honey bees are truly domesticated (modified genetically to be more useful to humans), it is certain that humans have changed their living conditions through a variety of means. Just as domestic animals are manipulated by farmers in their housing, feed, and even medical care, so too are the colonies of honey bees that are managed by beekeepers. We suggest the following goals to help improve colony fitness through alterations of honey bee lifestyle.

      Goal 1: Boost Rather than Disrupt Social Immunity of the Superorganism

      In the next chapter we will learn that a honey bee colony is a superorganism. In other words, it is a highly integrated unit of function that has been shaped by natural selection to function as an integrated whole. One result of this high level of organization is that the immune system of a worker honey bee is relatively simple compared to those of non‐social bees. With this in mind, we should note that there the beekeeper and bee doctor can inadvertantly weaken the social immunity of the colony. Perhaps the most damaging is breaking and reducing the propolis envelope, which will impair the colony's social immunity and compromise honey bee health. Therefore, the number of times a hive is opened for inspections


Скачать книгу