The Mental Life of Monkeys and Apes: A Study of Ideational Behavior. Robert Mearns Yerkes

The Mental Life of Monkeys and Apes: A Study of Ideational Behavior - Robert Mearns Yerkes


Скачать книгу
… … … … … 5 … … … … … … 1

       6 … … … … … … 1.2.3.4.5 … … … … … … 5 … … … … … … 5

       7 … … … … … … 2.3.4.5.6.7 … … … … . … 6 … … … … … … 2

       8 … … … … … … 2.3.4.5.6.7 … … … … . … 6 … … … … … … 7

       9 … … … … … … 3.4.5.6.7.8 … … … … . … 6 … … … … … … 3

       10 … … … … … … 3.4.5.6.7.8 … … … … . … 6 … … … … … … 8

      PROBLEM 4. Middle

      Doors No. of No. of

       Settings open doors open right door

       1 … … … … … … 4.5.6.7.8 … … … … … … 5 … … … … … … 6

       2 … … … … … … 1.2.3 … … … … … … . … 3 … … … … … … 2

       3 … … … … … … 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 … … . … 9 … … … … … … 5

       4 … … … … … … 2.3.4.5.6 … … … … … … 5 … … … … … … 4

       5 … … … … … … 6.7.8 … … … … … … . … 3 … … … … … … 7

       6 … … … … … … 3.4.5.6.7.8.9 … … … . … .7 … … … … … … 6

       7 … … … … … … 7.8.9 … … … … … … . … 3 … … … … … … 8

       8 … … … … … … 1.2.3.4.5.6.7 … … … . … .7 … … … … … … 4

       9 … … … … … … 2.3.4 … … … … … … . … 3 … … … … … … 3

       10 … … … … … … 3.4.5.6.7 … … … … … … 5 … … … … … … 5

      It was my aim so far as possible to present to a given subject each day the ten settings under a given problem in order, without interruption. If for any reason the series of observations had to be interrupted, it was resumed at the same point subsequently. Occasionally it was found desirable or necessary to present only five of the series of ten settings in succession and then to interrupt observations for an interval of a few minutes or even several hours. But as a rule it was possible to present the series of ten settings. All things being considered, it proved more satisfactory to give only ten trials a day to each subject. Frequently twenty and rarely thirty trials were given on the same day. In such cases the series of settings was simply repeated. The only pause between trials was that necessary for resetting the entrance doors and replenishing the food which served as a reward for success.

       Table of Contents

      RESULTS OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS

      1. Skirrl, Pithecus irus

       Problem 1. First at the Left End

      Systematic work with the multiple-choice apparatus and method described in the previous section was undertaken early in April with Skirrl, Sobke, and Julius. The results for each of them are now to be presented with such measure of detail as their importance seems to justify.

      Skirrl had previously been used by Doctor Hamilton in an experimental study of reactive tendencies. He proved so remarkably inefficient in the work that Doctor Hamilton was led to characterize him as feeble-minded, and to recommend him to me for further study because of his mental peculiarities. With me he was from the first frank, aggressive, and inclined to be savage. It was soon possible for me to go into the large cage, Z, with him and allow him to take food from my hand. He was without fear of the experimental apparatus and it proved relatively easy to accustom him to the routine of the experiment. Throughout the work he was rather slow, inattentive, and erratic.

      Beginning on April 7, I sought to acquaint him with the multiple-choice apparatus by allowing him to make trips through the several boxes, with the reward of food each time. Thus, for example, with the entrance and exit doors of box 7 raised, the monkey was allowed to pass into the reaction-compartment E and thence through box 7 to the food cup. As soon as he had finished eating, he was called back to D by the experimenter and, after a few seconds, allowed, similarly, to make a trip by way of one of the other boxes. By reason of this preliminary training he soon came to seek eagerly for the reward of food.

      On April 10 the apparatus was painted white in order to increase the lightness and thus render it easier for the experimenter to observe the animal's movements, and when on April 12 Skirrl was again introduced to it for further preliminary training, he utterly refused to enter the boxes, giving every indication of extreme fear of the white floors and even of the sides of the boxes. Finally, the attempts to induce him to enter the boxes had to be given up, and he was returned to his cage unfed. The following day I was equally unsuccessful in either driving or tempting him with food into the apparatus. But on April 14 he was so hungry that he was finally lured in by the use of food. He cautiously approached the boxes and attempted to climb through on the sides instead of walking on the floor. It was perfectly evident that he had an instinctive or an acquired fear of the white surfaces. As the matter was of prime importance for the success of my work, I inquired of Doctor Hamilton, and of the men in charge of the cages, for any incident which might account for this peculiar behavior, and I learned that some three months earlier, while the animal cages were being whitewashed, Skirrl had jumped at one of the laborers who was applying a brush to the framework of one of the cages and had shaken some lime into his eyes. He was greatly frightened and enraged. Evidently he experienced extreme discomfort, if not acute pain, and there resulted an association with whiteness which was quite sufficient to cause him to avoid the freshly painted apparatus.

      Having obtained an adequate explanation of this monkey's peculiar behavior, I proceeded with my efforts to induce him to work smoothly and rapidly, and on April 15, by covering the floor with sawdust, I so diminished the influence of the whiteness as to render the preliminary training fairly satisfactory. At the end of two more days everything was going so well that it seemed desirable to begin the regular experiment.

      On the morning of April 19, Skirrl was introduced to the apparatus and given his first series of ten trials on problem 1. This problem demanded the selection of the first door at the left in any group of open doors. The procedure was as previously described in that the experimenter raised the entrance doors of a certain group of boxes, admitted the animal to the reaction-chamber, punished incorrect choices by confining the animal for thirty seconds, and rewarded correct choices by raising the exit door and thus permitting escape and the obtaining of food. The trials were given in rapid succession, and the total time required for this first series of ten trials was thirty-five minutes. Skirrl worked faithfully throughout this interval and exhibited no marked discouragement. When confined in a box he showed uneasiness and dissatisfaction by moving about constantly, shaking the doors, and trying to raise them in order to escape.

      For the series of settings used in connection with problem 1, the reader is referred to page 18. In the first setting, the doors numbered 1, 2, and 3, were opened. As it happened, the animal when admitted to the reaction-chamber immediately chose box l. Having received the reward of food, he was called back to D, and doors 8 and 9 having been raised in preparation for the next trial, he was again admitted to the reaction-chamber. This time he quickly chose box 9 and was confined therein for thirty seconds. On being released, he chose after an interval of four minutes, box 8, thus completing the trial.

      As


Скачать книгу