3D Printing for Energy Applications. Группа авторов

3D Printing for Energy Applications - Группа авторов


Скачать книгу
of technical solution of these methodologies have been multiplied, covering a very large range of technical solutions, including multi‐materials printing by FMD, desktop 3D printers, open source inexpensive solutions, hybridization of deposition methods and development of novel starting materials for the fabrication of ceramics, metals, and composite materials.

Schematic illustration of the classification of commercially available additive manufacturing methods according to dimensional order, process, and material.

      Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) uses thermal energy to melt the filament material that is feed through a heating element with the aid of a roller system and is extruded directly onto the build platform or a substrate. The extruded line of material will adhere to the adjacent and underlying material upon cooling and will form the layered structure. For the deposition of the proceeding layers the build platform will move down as specified by the layer thickness settings which vary between 50 and 200 μm [4], while for the X and Y plane parameters the extruder diameter and the molten material pitch can be adjusted by the process parameters. It is important to mention that parameter settings will affect the resulting quality and performance of the final part. The extrusion nature of the process gives rise to several print defects and makes small features challenging to print. Cooling related issues can be solved with a control temperature build platform, while the extrusion parameters are responsible for structural and geometrical issues [6]. The filament materials used are thermoplastics with solid particle loading above 40% and grain sizes ranging around 1–5 μm [1]. Post processing to remove organic components and sintering is required for densification to occur, however it is a cost effective solution with fairly simple equipment.

      Indirect Inkjet Printing (IIP) as the name suggests is similar to DIP, with the difference that liquid binder the jetting material deposited on ceramic powder to form the material layer. It is a powder bed process that can offer several advantages such as structural support during printing, reuse of powder material, increasing shape complexity, and reducing printing time compared to DIP, however print resolution is in the order of 100 μm [1], similar to SLS. In this case the mechanical performance of the printed parts is a significant disadvantage and post‐process hardening is a way to counteract it.

      All types of industry will benefit from the introduction of complex geometries generated by additive manufacturing but it will be even more interesting to take advantage of other unique capabilities


Скачать книгу