Industrial Carbon and Graphite Materials. Группа авторов

Industrial Carbon and Graphite Materials - Группа авторов


Скачать книгу
Jäger, H., Letizia, I., and Wilhelmi, G. (1988). Fuel 67: 792–797.

      29 29 Turner, N.R. (1988). International Conference on Carbon, Newcastle, 470.

      30 30 Steward, N.I. and Halley, P.H. (1994). Light Metals 1994 (ed. A.T. Tabereaux), 517–524. Warrendale, PA: TMS.

      31 31 Wallouch, R.W., Murty, H.N., and Heintz, E.A. (1972). Carbon 10: 729.

      32 32 Briggs, D.K.H. (1964). Fuel 43: 439–443.

      33 33 Lewis, R.T., Riffle, D.M., and Singer, L.S. (1986). International Conference on Carbon, Baden‐Baden, 28–30.

      34 34 Zander, M., Alscher, A., Boenigk, W., and Haenel, M.W. (1991). Light Metals 1991 (ed. E.L. Rooy), 597. Warrendale, PA: TMS.

      35 35 Newman, J.W. (1979). Light Metals 1980 (ed. C.J. McMinn), 503. New York, NY: AIME.

      36 36 Siemens‐Plania AG (1958). Verfahren zur Herstellung von Kohle‐ und Graphitformkörpern, DE 969619 (F. Jeitner, E. Nedopil).

      37 37 Hoechst (1953). Verfahren zur Herstellung von Kohleelektroden, DE 900569 (O. Peter).

      38 38 Annual Report 2014, Himadri Chemicals & Industries Linited, Ruby House 8., Kolkata 700 001, India.

      39 39 Dwivedi, H., Mathur, R.B., Dhami, T.L., Bahl, O.P., Monthioux, M., Sharma, S.P. (2006). Carbon 44: 699–709.

      40 40 Machnikowski, J., Rutkowski, P., Diez, M.A., Anal, J. (2006). Appl. Pyrolysis 76: 80–87.

      41 41 Trick, K.A., Saliba, T. E. (1995). Carbon 23: 1509–1515.

      42 42 Fitzer, E., Schäfer, W. (1970). Carbon 8: 353–364.

      43 43 Gardzielle, A., Pilato, E.A., Knop, A (2002). Phenolic Resins 2nd ed., Berlin: Springer.

      44 44 Lenghaus, K., Qiao, G.G., Solomon, D.H. (2001). Polymer 42: 3355–3362.

      45 45 Machnikowski, J., Rutkowski, P., Diez, M.A., Anal, J. (2006). Appl. Pyrolysis 76: 80–87.

      46 46 Horikawa, T., Ogawa, K., Mizuno, K., Hayashi, J., Muroyama, K. (2003). Carbon 41: 465–472.

      47 47 Sobera, M., Hetper, J. (2003). J. Chromatogr. A 993: 131–135.

      48 48 Liedtke, V., Hüttinger, K.J. (1996). Carbon 34: 1057–1086.

      49 49 Riesz, C.H., Susman, S. (1960). Proc. Conf. Carbon 4th 1959: 609.

      Further Reading

      1 Frohs, W. and Roessner, F. (2015, N0267). Expansion of carbon artifacts during graphitization – an industrial issue. Carbon: 1–7.

      Note

      1 † Deceased.

       Heinrich Predel1 and Srini Srivatsan2

       1 Engineering Consultant, Karlsruhe, Germany

       2 Heavy Oils & Coking Technology, Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Houston TX, USA

      6.1.2.1. Introduction

      Petroleum coke is a grayish‐black solid residue with high carbon content. It is obtained during the thermal conversion process in crude oil processing. Although petroleum coke has been known for more than 110 years, both production and its specific application and improvement have seen an increasing boom only during the last 50 years. Petroleum coke production rate has grown from 60 × 106 t/a in 2006 to 110 × 106 t/a in 2013. It is anticipated that by the year 2017, about 150 × 106 t/a petroleum coke will be produced in oil refineries. The majority of this quantity (92%) is obtained from delayed coking units. In other refineries processing heavy oil, some investments have been made in flexicoking units, whereas no new fluid coking units have been installed recently.

      6.1.2.2. Physical and Chemical Properties

      6.1.2.2.1 Physical Properties

      Another basic form of petroleum coke is calcined coke. Calcined coke is a product derived from green coke. Here, the hydrocarbons have been removed by heating green coke under reducing conditions in kilns or hearths to over 1300 °C.

      The classification of petroleum coke types derived from delayed cokers into the following categories based on its usage:

       Fuel grade (cement manufacturing, power generation).

       Anode grade (consumed as anodes in aluminum industry).

       Electrode grade (used in electric arc furnace [EAF] during steel manufacture).

      Petroleum coke can also be classified by appearance as:

       Shot coke (small spherical balls called “beebes”).

       Sponge coke (amorphous, may contain shot beebes).

       Sponge/honeycomb coke (regular or anode‐grade coke having amorphous structure).

       Needle coke (crystalline, clusters of aligned needles).

      The definition is not precise [1]. A differentiation with regard to isotropy and crystal structure is logical. There is a graded transition from shot coke (mainly isotropic; amorphous, no crystal structures formed; hardly any pores) to needle coke (high anisotropy; regular crystal structures, containing a great number of fine pores, crystallite size of the order of 4–7 nm).

      Sponge and needle cokes have to be calcined before they can be used for aluminum or steel production. Calcined coke is a product derived from green coke. Here, the residual hydrocarbons have been removed by heating green coke under reducing conditions in kilns or hearths to over 1300 °C.

      Typical properties for the various types of coke are shown:

       Fuel grade:VCM (wt%) 14 maximum; moisture (wt%) 8–12; HGI 30–70; sulfur (wt%) 3–7.5

       Anode grade:Green: HGI 60–100Calcined: sulfur (wt%) 3.5 maximum; ash (wt%) 0.4 maximum; Ni (ppm wt) 200 maximum; V (ppm wt) 350 maximum; VBD (g/cc) 0.87 minimum; real density (g/cc) 2.05 minimum

       Needle coke:Calcined: sulfur (wt%) < 0.5; N (wt%) < 0.5; ash (wt%) < 0.1; real density (g/cc) 2.10–2.14; CTE°× 10 − 7 (30 125 °C) 2.5


Скачать книгу