Wind Energy Handbook. Michael Barton Graham

Wind Energy Handbook - Michael Barton Graham


Скачать книгу
where the variation of hourly mean wind speed about the annual mean is small, as is sometimes the case in the trade wind belts, for instance. A lower value of k, such as 1.5 or 1.2, indicates greater variability about the mean. A few examples are shown in Figure 2.2. The value of Γ(1 + 1/k) varies little, between about 1.0 and 0.885: see Figure 2.3.

Graph depicts an example Weibull distributions. Graph depicts the factor Γ(1 + 1/k).

      Although a Weibull distribution gives a good representation of the wind regime at many sites, this is not always the case. For example, some sites showing distinctly different wind climates in summer and winter can be represented quite well by a double‐peaked ‘bi‐Weibull’ distribution, with different scale factors and shape factors in the two seasons, i.e.

      (2.5)upper F left-parenthesis upper U right-parenthesis equals upper F 1 exp left-parenthesis minus left-parenthesis StartFraction upper U Over c 1 EndFraction right-parenthesis Superscript k 1 Baseline right-parenthesis plus left-parenthesis 1 minus upper F 1 right-parenthesis exp left-parenthesis minus left-parenthesis StartFraction upper U Over c 2 EndFraction right-parenthesis Superscript k 2 Baseline right-parenthesis

      Certain parts of California are good examples of this.

      On shorter timescales than the seasonal changes described in Section 2.4, wind speed variations are somewhat more random and less predictable. Nevertheless, these variations contain definite patterns. The frequency content of these variations typically peaks at around four days or so. These are the ‘synoptic’ variations, which are associated with large‐scale weather patterns, such as areas of high and low pressure and associated weather fronts as they move across the earth's surface. Coriolis forces induce a circular motion of the air as it tries to move from high‐ to low‐pressure regions. These coherent large‐scale atmospheric circulation patterns may typically take a few days to pass over a given point, although they may occasionally ‘stick’ in one place for longer before finally moving on or dissipating.

      Following the frequency spectrum to still higher frequencies, many locations will show a distinct diurnal peak, at a frequency of 24 hours. This is usually driven by local thermal effects. Intense heating in the daytime may cause large convection cells in the atmosphere, which die down at night. This process is described in more detail in Section 2.6 because it also contributes significantly to turbulence, on timescales representative of the size of the convection cells. Land and sea breezes, caused by differential heating and cooling between land and sea, also contribute significantly to the diurnal peak. The daily direction reversal of these winds would be seen as a 12‐hour peak in the spectrum of wind speed magnitude.

      2.6.1 The nature of turbulence

      Turbulence is generated mainly from two causes: ‘friction’ with the earth's surface, which can be thought of as extending as far as flow disturbances caused by such topographical features as hills and mountains, and thermal effects, which can cause air masses to move vertically as a result of variations of temperature and hence in the density of the air. Often these two effects are interconnected, such as when a mass of air flows over a mountain range and is forced up into cooler regions where it is no longer in thermal equilibrium with its surroundings.

      Turbulence is clearly a complex process and one that cannot be represented simply in terms of deterministic equations. Clearly it does obey certain physical laws, such as those describing the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy. However, to describe turbulence using these laws it is necessary to take account of temperature, pressure, density, and humidity as well as the motion of the air itself in three dimensions. It is then possible to formulate a set of differential equations describing the process, and in principle the progress of the turbulence can be predicted by integrating these equations forward in time starting from certain initial conditions and subject to certain boundary conditions. In practice of course, the process can be described as ‘chaotic’ in that small differences in initial conditions or boundary conditions may result in large differences in the predictions after a relatively short time. For this reason it is generally more useful to develop descriptions of turbulence in terms of its statistical properties.

      There are many statistical descriptors of turbulence that may be useful, depending on the application. These range from simple turbulence intensities and gust factors to detailed descriptions of the way in which the three components of turbulence vary in space and time as a function of frequency.

      The turbulence intensity is a measure of the overall level of turbulence. It is defined as

      (2.6)upper I equals StartFraction sigma Over upper U overbar EndFraction

      where σ is the standard deviation of wind speed variations about the mean wind speed upper U overbar, usually defined over 10 minutes or an hour. Turbulent wind speed variations can be considered to be roughly Gaussian, meaning that the speed variations are normally distributed, with standard deviation σ, about the mean wind speed upper U overbar. However, the tails of the distribution may be significantly non‐Gaussian, so this approximation is not reliable for estimating, say, the probability of a large gust within a certain period.

      The turbulence intensity clearly depends on the roughness of the ground surface and the height above the surface. However, it also depends on topographical features, such as hills or mountains, especially when they lie upwind, as well as more


Скачать книгу